• All Share : 53921
    UP 0.37%
    Top40 - (Tradeable) : 47835.75
    UP 0.23%
    Financial 15 : 15404.5
    UP 0.29%
    Industrial 25 : 73003.78
    UP 0.19%
    Resource 10 : 31952.76
    UP 0.74%

  • ZAR/USD : 15.7283
    UP 1.37%
    ZAR/GBP : 22.853
    UP 0.58%
    ZAR/EUR : 17.4003
    UP 0.21%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.1415
    UP 0.43%
    ZAR/AUD : 11.2486
    UP 0.45%

  • Gold US$/oz : 1212.8
    DOWN -0.55%
    Platinum US$/oz : 976
    DOWN -1.51%
    Silver US$/oz : 16.2
    DOWN -0.55%
    Palladium US$/oz : 536
    DOWN -1.11%
    Brent Crude : 49.48
    UP 0.04%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by Profile Data
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Sat May 28 02:07:34 SAST 2016

'Happy Birthday' copyright challenged

Sapa-dpa | 17 June, 2013 09:15

Image by: Wikimedia Commons

A documentary filmmaker is suing a publishing arm of Warner Music Group after the company charged her $1 500 to use the song Happy Birthday in her movie about the song’s history.

According to Courthouse News Service on Friday, the class action lawsuit was filed Thursday in New York by Good Morning to You Productions, which claims that Warner/Chappel Music was “wrongfully and unlawfully” claiming the copyright to the song.

If the claim is upheld in court, the music publishing giant could be forced to pay back tens of millions of dollars to companies who were forced to pay to use the song.

The lawsuit claims that the song was actually composed in 1893 as the kindergarten song Good Morning to You and that the original copyright expired no later than 1921.

Warner’s claims are based on a piano arrangement to the song that it copyrighted in 1935, and should be limited to that specific piano arrangement, the lawsuit claimed.

“More than 120 years after the melody — to which the simple lyrics of Happy Birthday to You is set — was first published, defendant Warner/Chappell boldly, but wrongfully and unlawfully, insists that it owns the copyright,” the plaintiffs wrote.

Warner reportedly acquired rights to the song when it paid 25 million dollars in 1988 to acquire Birchtree Lts, a small company that claimed ownership of the song. The company had not responded to the lawsuit as of late Friday.


If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.