Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 41079.55
    DOWN -0.81%
    Top 40 : 3341.05
    DOWN -0.37%
    Financial 15 : 11832.90
    DOWN -2.18%
    Industrial 25 : 46966.65
    DOWN -0.43%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.4373
    UP 0.39%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.3805
    UP 1.11%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.1477
    UP 0.71%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0921
    UP 0.78%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.2581
    UP 1.06%

  • Gold : 1385.3150
    UP 3.11%
    Platinum : 1486.0000
    UP 3.99%
    Silver : 22.7553
    UP 8.08%
    Palladium : 750.5000
    UP 2.25%
    Brent Crude Oil : 105.150
    UP 0.51%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Mon May 20 19:10:28 SAST 2013

Alternative power sources not that cheap: iLIVE

Ken Irwin, Cape Town | 31 October, 2012 00:22
Energy Minister Dipuo Peters

If energy Minister Dipuo Peters were to announce an eco-friendly drive to increase the cost of fuel five to eight times, there would be howls of outrage.

Yet the minister freely admits that Eskom will be "investing" in wind power, which costs 5.5 times, and solar power, 8.86 times, than what Eskom currently generates power for ("Government poised to sign energy deals," yesterday).

All this for renewable energy and reduced carbon output. Both these sources of energy are unreliable. As they make up a bigger percentage of the input to the grid, an even larger proportion of conventional power stations has to remain on hot running standby to take up the slack at a moment's notice. This is dreadfully inefficient.

At most, wind and solar power can make up 3% of the grid before standby power starts to exceed what is normally available.

If wind and solar made up 100% of the supply to the grid, you would need to have 90% conventional power running in hot spinning standby mode to back it up, which is hopelessly inefficient.

A Dutch study showed that carbon savings from windmills became negative over 3% of the grid supply.

Solar and wind are laudable alternatives and I would support government funding of pilot plants and further research. However, wholesale investment in patently uneconomic processes is wasteful .

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.