• All Share : 53506.62
    UP 0.04%
    Top40 - (Tradeable) : 46806.74
    UP 0.10%
    Financial 15 : 14966.44
    UP 0.21%
    Industrial 25 : 71453.73
    DOWN -0.22%
    Resource 10 : 32665.75
    UP 0.99%

  • ZAR/USD : 14.3694
    UP 1.11%
    ZAR/GBP : 18.8311
    UP 1.20%
    ZAR/EUR : 16.0812
    UP 1.19%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.1406
    UP 1.22%
    ZAR/AUD : 10.8578
    UP 0.43%

  • Gold US$/oz : 1320.5
    DOWN -0.08%
    Platinum US$/oz : 1072
    UP 0.09%
    Silver US$/oz : 18.65
    UP 0.81%
    Palladium US$/oz : 686
    DOWN -0.15%
    Brent Crude : 49.64
    DOWN -0.08%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by Profile Data
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Sat Aug 27 10:21:13 SAST 2016

Give education crisis 100%: iLIVE

Fred Calitz, by e-mail | 19 February, 2013 00:14
File photo
Image by: The Time/ Daniel Born / Gallo Images

It is almost inconceivable that the chairman of Umalusi can be so misguided as to think just a small number of matrics passed with only the minimum 30% ("'30% for matric not norm'", February 13).

Anyone familiar with the bell shape of the frequency distributions of examination marks should be able to realise that the bulk of the marks are around 30% and 40%. In fact, it should not be too difficult to determine what the pass percentage would have been if the requirements were a sub-minimum of 35% in three subjects and 45% in three more.

I am sure it would have been no more than 50% of the candidates.

Let us then heed people like Jonathan Jansen and Mamphela Ramphele, admit that our education system is in crisis and seriously address the problems, rather than doing something only if it advances one's position and does not require undue exertion.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.