Latest
 
  • All Share : 48660.44
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Top 40 : 3779.88
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Financial 15 : 14749.68
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Industrial 25 : 59026.41
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • ZAR/USD : 10.8995
    DOWN -0.47%
    ZAR/GBP : 17.4153
    DOWN -0.61%
    ZAR/EUR : 13.7081
    DOWN -0.85%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0985
    DOWN -0.98%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.5871
    DOWN -0.04%

  • Gold : 1190.1500
    DOWN -0.83%
    Platinum : 1245.5000
    UP 0.28%
    Silver : 16.2750
    DOWN -1.45%
    Palladium : 779.5000
    UP 0.58%
    Brent Crude Oil : 85.880
    DOWN -0.42%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Fri Oct 31 07:38:14 SAST 2014

Give education crisis 100%: iLIVE

Fred Calitz, by e-mail | 19 February, 2013 00:14
File photo
Image by: The Time/ Daniel Born / Gallo Images

It is almost inconceivable that the chairman of Umalusi can be so misguided as to think just a small number of matrics passed with only the minimum 30% ("'30% for matric not norm'", February 13).

Anyone familiar with the bell shape of the frequency distributions of examination marks should be able to realise that the bulk of the marks are around 30% and 40%. In fact, it should not be too difficult to determine what the pass percentage would have been if the requirements were a sub-minimum of 35% in three subjects and 45% in three more.

I am sure it would have been no more than 50% of the candidates.

Let us then heed people like Jonathan Jansen and Mamphela Ramphele, admit that our education system is in crisis and seriously address the problems, rather than doing something only if it advances one's position and does not require undue exertion.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.