Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 41815.36
    UP 1.79%
    Top 40 : 3443.42
    UP 3.06%
    Financial 15 : 12000.90
    UP 1.42%
    Industrial 25 : 47656.81
    UP 1.47%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.5226
    UP 0.97%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.4430
    UP 0.31%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.2969
    UP 1.08%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0930
    UP 0.69%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.3540
    UP 1.00%

  • Gold : 1381.0200
    DOWN -0.86%
    Platinum : 1461.5000
    DOWN -1.58%
    Silver : 22.6015
    DOWN -1.07%
    Palladium : 748.5000
    UP 0.74%
    Brent Crude Oil : 104.400
    DOWN -0.38%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Tue May 21 18:48:44 SAST 2013

New York appeals court rules against US marriage law

Sapa-AP | 19 October, 2012 09:27
Edith Windsor, an 83-year-old woman who says the Defense of Marriage Act discriminates against gay couples in violation of the US Constitution, speaks to the media during a news conference in New York October 18, 2012. A US appeals court in New York on Thursday ruled that a U.S. law defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman unconstitutionally denies federal benefits to lawfully married same-sex couples.
Image by: EDUARDO MUNOZ / REUTERS

The US law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman took another judicial hit when an appeals court in New York declared it unconstitutional.

Supporters of same-sex marriage hailed the Second US Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling on the controversial Defence of Marriage Act, or DOMA, which mirrored an earlier judgement from another federal appeals court in Boston.

“Section Three of DOMA violates equal protection and is therefore unconstitutional,” said the court, citing the part that says “’marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.” Enacted in 1996, DOMA effectively prohibits married same-sex couples from enjoying the same federal benefits and programs as their heterosexual counterparts.

The Supreme Court is expected to consider next month whether to hear a challenge to its legality.

The New York case was initiated by Edith Windsor, who sued the US government in 2010 after it told her to pay more than $350 000 in estate taxes following the death of her long-time partner Thea Spyer, whom she married in Canada in 2007.

A married straight couple would have faced no estate tax.

“Yet again, a federal court has found that it is completely unfair to treat married same-sex couples as though they’re legal strangers,” said James Esseks of the American Civil Liberties Union’s LGBT program in a statement.

“This ruling is an important step in ensuring the rights of men and women are not dependent upon who they love and who they chose to spend their lives with,” added New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

“Today, we’re one step closer to striking down the Defence of Marriage Act,” added New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, who wedded her lesbian partner in May, a year after New York state recognised same-sex marriages.

Eight of the 50 states, as well as the District of Columbia, have recognised same-sex marriage, which is vigorously opposed by evangelicals and the Roman Catholic Church. New York is the most populous of those states.

In a report Thursday, the Human Rights Campaign, an LGBT civil rights group, said Catholic organisations have spent at least $1.1 million dollars in four states — Maine, Maryland, Minnesota and Washington — where marriage equality is being put to voters on November 6 in tandem with the presidential election.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.