Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE &
Business LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
Thu Feb 23 07:56:19 SAST 2012

Extra VAT threat to fund health scheme

HARRIET MCLEA | 12 September, 2011 00:33

The government might raise value-added tax to fund its national health insurance scheme.

The Treasury's chief director of economic tax analysis and tax policy, Cecil Morden, said at the annual meeting of the Government Employees' Medical Scheme last week that "a higher VAT rate could be justified on efficiency grounds".

An all-round increase in VAT would inflate the prices of food and other products, which would have dire consequences for the poor.

Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan has been tight-lipped about how a national health insurance scheme would be funded.

Morden said that "a higher VAT rate could be justified on efficiency grounds".

He said that South Africa's 14% VAT rate is "relatively low when compared to the worldwide average of 16.4%".

Though Morden warned that it was important to keep "an appropriate balance" between taxes, he said that "a consumption tax [such as VAT] is less distortionary" and has a "relatively broad [taxpayer] base".

"[VAT] ensures that those who manage to escape the income tax net pay some tax," he said. "[VAT] does not impact on savings negatively or on the cost of employment."

The Treasury has suggested four national health insurance "funding avenues", including tax, mandatory employer contributions, user charges and public-private partnerships.

Morden cited Ghana, which uses VAT to pay for its national health insurance scheme. Ghana's Revenue Authority has projected that a 2.5% consumption tax, known as the "NHIS levy" will fund 60% of that country's universal healthcare scheme.

But international aid organisation Oxfam has warned that the Ghanaian model, promoted by the World Bank, is "severely flawed".

Oxfam's health policy adviser, Anna Marriott, said: "It's time for the World Bank to ... stop promoting an inequitable health insurance system to other developing countries."

The Treasury's chief director of communications, Bulelwa Boqwana, said: "No decision has been made on which [health insurance funding] option or combination of options will be implemented".

Boqwana said that "no rate increase for any of these options can be announced at this stage."

Unions have warned against increasing VAT. Cosatu spokesman Patrick Craven said that VAT was "a very unprogressive tax" and that the rich should be taxed more than the poor. Cosatu will "consistently oppose" an increase in VAT, Craven said.

Rhodes University tax professor Matthew Lester said that Morden "seems to be favouring VAT" but any suggestion of raising VAT would cause an uproar by the unions.

He suggested that a carbon emissions tax and company tax, though unpopular, would be preferable to increasing VAT, which he described as a "holy cow" of the unions.

Company tax, personal income tax and VAT contribute 20%, 34% and 27% of South Africa's tax revenue respectively.

The projected costs of a national health insurance scheme are likely to change. Morden's presentation showed that the Treasury expects an R18.5-billion shortfall in health funding next year.

Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi has set out standards healthcare facilities must attain to qualify as national health insurance scheme providers.

The Department of Health is auditing all 4200 public health facilities in the country. About 800 had been audited by July.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

the_original_MommaCyndi

Posted 163 days ago
Avatar
VAT is the most democratic of taxes. You only pay into the kitty proportional to what you spend on yourself. I would be in favour of a sliding scale VAT where 'luxury' items get a higher VAT than essentials but I'm not sure that SARS could control it.

Unless old No-Vat-Vavi is still confused about what is vattable and what isn't, I can't see why the unions would be upset about this.
Avatar

the_original_MommaCyndi

Posted 163 days ago
Until they are forced, at the ballot box, there is no way that they will stop skimming the cream off the top and there is no way that they will stop appointing their moron cousins (who can't get a job anywhere else). The best we can hope for is that a little more will be available for what is needed. If the 'poor' taxi drivers have to pay more for goods from their un-declared profits - well ag, shame - I prefer that to having it all dumped on the middle class

IF Doc Aaron gets the hospitals and clinics on track and IF they continue with the audits at regular times, we may even get back to the medical care we had 5 or 10 years ago - its going to take a while longer to get back to what it originally was.
Avatar

ClintonClark

Posted 163 days ago
VAT is the most democratic of taxes. You only pay into the kitty proportional to what you spend on yourself. I would be in favour of , replaceing incometax with VAT even at 25% on all goods, lower income may then get state coupons for discount (20%) on esential items. This would be a insentive to.
Avatar

the_original_MommaCyndi

Posted 163 days ago
Andrew,
The problem is that the middle class are being squeezed. Not the rich or (comparatively) the poor. Its the middle class that is baring the brunt of EVERYTHING. Worse still, it is the law abiding middle class that bleeds.

The guy down the road bought his house cash (literally in a suitcase). He owns a fleet of taxis. Now what is the bet that the taxman doesn't even know he exists? At least a VAT increase (instead of the proposed tax increase) will be more fair to all.

I believe that food essentials should stay VAT exempt,
Other essentials, things like rent, transport, electricity, etc, should be at (for example) 10%
From there, any luxury item should be taxed according to how unessential it is and how pricey it is (e.g. a Taz at 14% and a Merc at 16% or a bottle of J+B at 18% and a bottle of Johhny Blue at 20%) ..... you get the drift.

IanManning

Posted 163 days ago
Avatar
Mythoughts entirely!
The Unions should be promoting a sliding scale VAT where luxury items such as expensive cars are taxed at a higher VAT scale and basic food should be VAT free. Revenue could set out schedules to prescribe the tax rates.

buddi

Posted 163 days ago
Avatar
You'd be surprised how little extra money would be needed if the health department managed their money more efficiently, and managed the current health department efficiently.
Till this is done, NHI will not work!

BobbyBob

Posted 163 days ago
Avatar
Well Budi, even then it wont meet all the expenditures. It is important that we understand that the NHI is unafordable, countries far richer than us, with smaller populations cant even pay for this.

We must also understand that if we are forced to finance this scheme we will have less money to spend on other goods and services, in other words, unemployment will rise.

Spitfire

Posted 163 days ago
Avatar
The greedy ANC government specialise in opportunistic robbery through their perverted financial policies. The "user pays" policy is cunningly being applied selectively so as not to alienate those who vote for the ANC. Highways are subject to the "user pays" but not health care, whilst taxis drive free and the rest must pay; there are also many other contradictory instances. The SABS is another case in point - why should those who never watch the garbage the SABC broadcast be forced to pay them a fee?? The ANC will discover sooner rather than later, that intelligent wage-earners and businessmen are well aware of the many underhand and dishonest methods being introduced to rob them of their hard-earned wages and will find greener pastures elsewhere. It becomes increasingly evident that the ANC's dysfunctional financial policies, which sees government employees and MPs amongst the highest paid in the world, with income tax and other taxes to match, are causing economic stagnation and increasing unemployment. With economic advisers like Patel, the situation is set to worsen.

Beelzebub

Posted 163 days ago
Avatar
NHI will fail, regardless of how the current government goes about funding it. These mampara's will dip into it to fund their lavish lifestyles, and the state of our national health system, and the state of all the parastals, proves that these mampara's are worse than useless.
Avatar

BobbyBob

Posted 163 days ago
We must also understand that if we are forced to finance this scheme we will have less money to spend on other goods and services, in other words, unemployment will rise.

thato.mogane

Posted 163 days ago
Avatar
I'm all Good with the NHI, i just think we need to make sure we have a plan of action thats well documented before we go ahead with implementation. We must address all the relevant issues that could bring this idea down, eg Skills shortage, proper management, internal Hospital processes, etc. And we need to also crack down on Fruitless expenditure like Loaning Swaziland 2.4 Billion. I think for that kind of money we shud have bought the whole country and given the King his marching orders or let him starve in that country alone and invite all the SWAZI people here to become citizens then he can clean the streets himself and make his own breakfasts..LOL

Loggenberg

Posted 163 days ago
Avatar
Does that mean that the state will go ahead with the private Pretoria hospital for the elite in government? They expect the health system will fall apart