Cops 'bungled' booze test in joggers tragedy
Police bungling could hamper the prosecution of the man who allegedly drove while drunk and killed five joggers in a horror accident in Midrand 10 days ago.
The Times has reliably established that police officers at the scene of the accident - in which four women and a man were killed - failed to draw blood from driver Sibusiso Langa within the prescribed two hours.
At least two sources close to the investigation have confirmed that Langa's blood was drawn about four hours after the accident, which was at the intersection of Olifantsfontein and Lever roads, in Midrand, on October 22.
The delay, they say, was partly due to confusion about in whose jurisdiction the crash took place. It occurred halfway between Johannesburg and Pretoria.
There was also confusion about where the motorist should be taken for his blood to be drawn.
Though statements by witnesses at the scene are yet to be finalised, officials said the "mess" by the officers would not only affect the prosecution but would also further traumatise the dead runners' families.
One official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said: "This is not good. With so many deceased, one would have expected the police to be extra cautious and follow the law to the letter. Tests conducted as prescribed by law are a gem for the prosecuting team."
Earlier, reports alleged that Langa had tried to walk away from the carnage and that he was so drunk he had to be reminded that he had driven into the joggers.
Langa, 43, a mechanical engineer, faces five charges of murder, one of attempted murder and another of drunk-driving.
He allegedly ploughed into the runners after losing control of his Mercedes-Benz ML500.
Moroese Mokoatsi, 34, Reneilwe Lesenyeho, 31, Given Mills, 30, Isaac Tlale, 37, and Nomvula Dumako, 35, were killed in the crash. They were all buried at the weekend.
The only survivor, Khanyiswa Stengile, was admitted to Fourways Life Hospital and underwent extensive surgery.
Another official alleged that, though it was certain that Langa's blood test would show an alcohol level above the legal limit - he was allegedly "very dronk " - investigators were engaged in extensive "damage control" to firm up the prosecution's case.
"There is no doubt that he was very dronk; it's just a case of how much over the limit he was. He will not escape this," the official said.
A Justice Department insider said that, though there could be repercussions about the delayed tests, all was not lost because there was other evidence, including statements by witnesses and paramedics at the scene of the accident.
"We have prosecuted many drunk-driving cases, some very similar. The court has in the past accepted witnesses' statements as evidence," said the Justice official.
A relative of one of the slain runners, who wanted to be identified only as Pinkie, said it would be a travesty if Langa's blood had not been drawn until four hours after the crash.
"That would be negligent, especially if it will have a negative impact on the case," she said.
Pinkie said the families were still battling to come to terms with their loss and the purported bungling was a further setback.
Private forensic consultant David Klatzow said such a bungle would put the state in a "very difficult" position.
"It's beyond belief that they would stuff-up like that. The blood test has to be administered at [most] two hours from the last time of driving in order to create a presumption."
But Klatzow agreed that all was not lost because, from reports on the incident, Langa appeared to have been "substantially drunk".
He said that though the two-hour timeframe was crucial to blood-alcohol testing, the body metabolised alcohol at a rate of 10% every hour.
Langa was on Friday granted R80000 bail. He will reappear in court on November 25.
As part of his bail conditions, Langa, who also holds US citizenship, had to surrender his passports and his driver's licence.
The National Prosecuting Authority was unable to respond to questions at the time of going to press.

SHARE YOUR OPINION
If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.BornintheRSA
Posted 206 days agoDaffy
Posted 206 days agoooooooooo
Posted 206 days agobis_k'hallawaya
Posted 206 days agothe_original_MommaCyndi
Posted 206 days agoWhy can't the paramedics be given authority to draw blood at an accident scene? Surely that would be a lot more practical.
grant99
MisterWendal
Posted 206 days agoooooooooo
MrJikelele
AMS-Dammer
pik_it_up
Posted 206 days agoMnbvcxz0
grant99
buddi
Posted 206 days agoRightway
Posted 206 days ago...
Very confused. We are not talking rocket science here of which you have every right to be confused of. We are talking about.. where you work. Do you know where you work and what is your jurisdiction.. if not ..why not. Did you not go to the Police training Academy.
Do your job first irrespective and then hand over to the rightful Police Station. Do not look for a reason not to do your job. What is wrong with you? Did your mother not teach you a work ethic. Stop talking rubbish and start working. I the tax payer demand that you work effectively and efficiently or else send you wife to work and you stay at home and look after the babies. Oh they are also not your jurisdiction. I give up.
the_original_MommaCyndi
Sometimes it comes down to something as petty as which side of the road the accident took place. If the cops then do the paper work in the wrong station or get the wrong hospital to do the tests, there is all sorts of problems. Its bureaucratic BS on steroids.
VUKUZENZELE
Posted 206 days agoALL Police Members?aspirant members should go for a psychometric evaluation before the are passed to serve as Public servants,as a matter of fact ,ALL Nurses,and other emergency personal should do these tests to see if they are mentally and psychologically capable of doing the Work.
This is actually where self respect and the sense of IRRESPONSIBILITY comes in to the picture and last mentioned is not part of the psyche of the MAJORITY of the Majority population of this country. "All i care is ,I`ve got a JOB and get my pay weather i work or not"
This goes for NURSES as well. and they are SH!T scared to give evidence in any court,hence the bungling of all cases resulted by the low intelligence levels exhibited by these officials,RATHER take BRIBES.This goes for NURSES as well.
ooooooooo
dwnwitjuju
Posted 206 days agoMnbvcxz0
CarelSteenekamp
zwelinapster
Posted 206 days agoSuch development reminds me of Mandoza case. Could it be the same explanation as well?
I refuse to believe that at a such horrific crash and crime scene cops can act so incompetently.
ooooooooo
Posted 206 days agoMnbvcxz0
Posted 206 days agomuk1
You are a wise person. Alcohol kills more people than cars and also destroys lots of homes. Although Manto, our past health minister, is remembered for her mad AIDS policies; she must be credited for the strict smoking policies.
muk1
There is a fine line between personal infrigments and state responsibility. This debate will continue like nature and nurture debate. You cannot have a 12 yr old smoking a packet a day; so it curtail this madness laws are passed. The smoking laws that prevents smokers smoking on planes, movies and other confined areas was long overdue. Drinking alcohol makes lots of people act and do stupid things.
Rightway
.....
@Mnbvcxo good points. However all superstitious beliefs are copt outs. Including the Rastafarians. To get closer to god they smoke weed. The only answer is education.
RedCoat
I would of given her credit for the outright banning,............
And yes some of the restrictions were overdue, only some.
@Ed ????????? come on! really?
Mnbvcxz0
Posted 206 days agoShLace
Posted 206 days agoHumanity has come up with enough math & stats formalae to work this one out without making such a big deal of. If it is possible to predict how drunk you will be based on your body weight and gender, then the reverse process of prediction (regression), are totally reliable and in order.
But I see the point. He killed 5 people and any bit of exposure about this creepy drunk is welcome.
zwelinapster
The question is - would that be admissible and acceptable as a hard evidence in court of law since it is not done as the law stipulates? My guess would be: No.
ShLace
Remember how our President was acquited on the rape charges through a similar process. The Pscyhologist who gave her 'expert opinion', did not think it was possible for the complainant to remember 'that much info' if she was 'frozen' as she claimed to be. And yet there is overwhelming empirical evidence to the contrary.
THANDY
Posted 206 days agoTHANDY
Posted 206 days agogrant99
Posted 206 days agoI'm no expert, just asking.