Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE &
Business LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
Sat May 26 09:39:36 SAST 2012

Impoverished South Africans want more from mines

Sapa-AP | 18 February, 2012 08:459 Comments
File picture
Image by: File picture

Impoverished and angry South Africans have held a marathon march across a platinum-rich corner of the country to demand that a multinational mining company share more wealth.

"They are making millions here, but the community around is getting nothing," said 21-year-old Olebogeng Tseleng, who rose at 5 a.m. Friday for a march that later started in her village of tin shacks and modest brick or cement homes, none with indoor plumbing.

From Matlou, about 45 miles (75 kilometres) northwest of Johannesburg, the march picked up more protesters in a series of villages strung between a line of low, rocky hills to the west and a giant platinum mine to the east owned by the multinational company Xstrata.

At each stop, there were speeches. The protest also was delayed by occasional outbursts of tire-burning and rock-throwing. But it was generally peaceful, unlike protests a day earlier in the nearby town of Rustenburg prompted by a mass layoff at another mine after a strike for higher wages was declared illegal.

Rustenburg was relatively calm Friday, a day after out-of-work miners looted stores and attacked miners lucky enough to have work. Police said one miner was killed and another seriously injured in Rustenburg.

A restive labour force and the demands of communities like Matlou are among the many challenges facing the mining industry in South Africa. The industry has been weakened by decades of under-investment, and a debate over nationalisation and other policy questions have created uncertainty that has spooked potential investors.

On Friday, the villagers of Matlou and its neighbours took five hours to march about 12 miles (20 kilometres) to the gates of an Xstrata platinum mine that is being transformed from a strip to an underground operation. There, they presented demands that included putting more locals to work at the mine. But they don't just want jobs. They say Xstrata should be building schools and roads, and offering scholarships to promising young students.

"They fail us," said John Modiselle, a community leader who said he had been bringing concerns to Xstrata for years.

Xstrata spokesman Songezo Zibi said he understood the impatience and frustration of villagers in a country with high rates of unemployment and poverty. But he said addressing South Africa's inequalities would take time, and that mining companies could do only so much.

Specialized workers were needed to complete the shafts at the mine near Matlou, Zibi said. He said Xstrata could either train locals to do the work, slowing construction, or bring in outsiders with the right skills to get the job done quickly so the mine can start operating. Once mining starts, expected in 2016, many of the 3,000 people it will employ will come from the area, he said.

Xstrata had built a clinic and other community projects in the region, and will do more once it starts making a profit at the mine, Zibi said.

In a speech earlier this month, Mining Minister Susan Shabangu said mining companies would not be the target of so much anger if they had done more since apartheid ended in 1994 to ensure black South Africans benefited from mining. The black majority was long nothing more than the low-paid labor for the country's mining industry.

Jonathan Snyman, a researcher at the South African Institute of Race Relations, said Shabangu has a point. But he said the debate over how to change the legacy of apartheid featured too much militant rhetoric from unions. He said a less fractious relationship between management and labour - and fewer strikes - would reassure potential foreign investors who have the money to help modernise South Africa's troubled mining industry.

Shabangu, the mining minister, says nationalisation is not on her government's agenda.

But Tseleng, among Friday's marchers, said turning mines over to the government might be a way to ensure the wealth was fairly shared.

"If they implement it and it fails, then they can find another solution," she said.

Tseleng said she and most of her neighbours are unemployed. She went to a well-regarded high school that Catholic nuns established in her village, then couldn't afford to go on to university. But mining executives prosper, she said.

"They don't want to uplift lives," she said. "They just want to take money."

To submit comments you must first

Join the discussion & Debate

Impoverished South Africans want more from mines

For Commenters Consideration | Please stick to the subject matter

COMMENTS [9]

Jonos

Posted 97 days ago
Avatar
And it's not only the mining co's. Too many multinationals are sucking profit out of SA and giving little back. But any change must be carefully managed and agreed together - it's pointless destroying the mining industry in anger, or driving away investment. That benefits no one.

CrackerCraker

Posted 97 days ago
Avatar
Locals should start participating in the economy like the rich do. The latter would never have reached their privileged positions in life if they had just waited for handouts and continued increasing their number of offspring. They became owners by into the businesses and enterprises. Had they not done so we would not have had mining houses or massive markets for our minerals.

The poor must decide what they are going to do about their situation. Either play with the rules or mindlessly destroy and get more poor. The days of pity for self-inflicted misery are over.

Nobody is so poor that they cannot buy into the economy. If you can form associations for political reasons then surely you must be able to do the same to improve your economic situation.

EJW

Posted 97 days ago
Avatar
This is how Communism started ... and eventually, sadly failed!

Africans are still way behind the rest of the world.

MoBlaq

Posted 97 days ago
Avatar
Anyone in their right mind wldnt expect Africa to be at par with the rest of the world after it has been raped for centuries by Settlers and able bodied individuals shipped to the USA and to a lesser extent the rest of the globe, to work as non-paid slaves.
Avatar

Hi--Jack

Posted 97 days ago
I do not know from where you get your facts. SA is very much on par with the rest of the developing world.

We have +-50% of Africa's GDP. The rest of Africa is growing at a rapid pace, albeit from a low base.

SA is on par with rest of the world. The fact that poverty is escalating under the ANC led gov in SA can only be laid in front of their own door.

I have just one question for your bold statement re SA anyway.


Where is SA inc's taxes going ????
Avatar

CrackerCraker

Posted 97 days ago
Nobody "raped" Africa and what's more, it is a myth that so-called "settlers" had a hand in it. There is in any event no such a thing as a "settler". If "settler" implies someone who had moved form one location at another then one has to admit that all the inhabitants of Southern Africa are actually "settlers". Some from certain parts of Africa further north and others from even further up north but mainly by ship instead of foot. Some of course from even the easterly direction.

Avatar

Anticrooks

Posted 97 days ago
Why was Africa allowed to be raped for centuries? What was wrong with the inhabitants of Africa? How did able-bodied men get shipped as slaves? Dont't you think there is something wrong with your logic? Are you admittig that inhabitants of Africa are lesser beins? Everyone are slaves under this government as well! Those that work have to pay through their noses and those that don't, live on handouts.

CrackerCraker

Posted 97 days ago
Avatar
How one's skin color can qualify you to permanent ownership of ANY part of this planet is a mystery. It doesn't. And no international law or jurisprudence allows such a conclusion that you may claim your little part of the planet because of the fact that your forefathers once upon a time used to be present on that little space.

Anticrooks

Posted 97 days ago
Avatar
What were the previous inhabitants (pre-settlers/colonialists) using the land for and how did they come to own it; by chasing the people on the land out or by paying for it some kind of way? Did they know of the valuable minerals/metals underground and if so, why did they not exploit it? I would like an unemotional answer to that qestion.