How to beat graft
The government's corruption-busting targets are over-ambitious and are being thwarted by internal disarray, according to former Special Investigating Unit boss Willie Hofmeyr.
Despite the establishment of a progressive anti-corruption task team to achieve the targets, South Africa faced challenges in fighting corruption. These obstacles needed to be overcome to improve investors' trust and willingness to invest in South Africa, he said.
Hofmeyr - whom President Jacob Zuma removed from the SIU in December apparently to focus on the Asset Forfeiture Unit - gave a glimpse of how the control of power within government structures affected one of the country's most crippling social ills.
"If we are to deal with corruption effectively it is very important that the different parts and streams of government work more closely than we do at the moment," he said.
"The difficulty . is that there is not a great coherence to what we do. There is not a single place where the accountability rests."
Addressing delegates at the Institute of Internal Auditors SA's public-sector forum in Kempton Park, east of Johannesburg, Hofmeyr said the anti-corruption task team established by the cabinet and Justice Minister Jeff Radebe was central to bringing "greater coherence and coordination" to corruption-busting. But the unit, which investigates politicians, heads of departments and state institutions, was plagued by authoritarian individuals. Control versus the need to work as a team at times hampered investigations.
"The government is putting building blocks in place, but it still needs a coherent overall strategy that should be broader than just the government," Hofmeyr said.
The task team's target of convicting 100 people who possess illicit assets worth more than R5-million by 2014 was "very ambitious as only about five have [been convicted] in the previous 10 years".
The anti-corruption task team - which consists of the Hawks, the SIU and the National Prosecuting Authority and which is supported by SARS and the treasury's accountant-general - has so far initiated 56 investigations, which have led to 26 people appearing in court.
Assets of 21 of the 26 - worth more than R500-million - have been frozen. This might increase to R1-billion in the "foreseeable future".
In total, 392 suspects have been nabbed by the unit, with 183 having appeared in court and nine successfully convicted.
Hofmeyr said the public perception that corruption had increased over the past five years was not true.
"The number of people investigating full-time has increased dramatically. This is why we see a lot more [stories about] corruption in the newspapers . the government is serious about it."

SHARE YOUR OPINION
If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.Mike123
Posted 94 days agodisillusionedstill
It is far easier than Mr H makes out or believes it to be (in all fairness, Mr H has never been at the tender documentation and management coalface).
Prevention is the only cure and age-old checks and balances have been thrown out.
BUT impartiality and inclusivity is non-negotiable.
For example, the DA's Bredell in the Western Cape hived of a suburb to a property developer. Its Bredell then became policemen, judge and jury.
The Eskom Chancellor House deal, by public admission of Valli Moosa, was 'stage-managed' by Deloittes. Anyone hear a peep against the professional practitioners?
The DA in Cape Town has done lease deals sans tender possibly individually bigger than some of SAPS - its deal at Media House with an old supportive family trust is at rental apparently well over R 100 a square metre.
After exposing the DA's Odendaal, the Public Protector is no longer the DA's flavour of the month.
Etcetera.
Expect this post to be removed.
* the main thrust of this is not to act against an alleged criminal, but primarily to score cheap political points.
Bruster
Posted 94 days agobuddi
Posted 94 days agoA good example follows:
EWN reported that apparently our premier (Gauteng) reckons that the MEC for Health cannot be held responsible, as he is a "political appointee" and is responsible for policy making, and not responsible to see that policies are followed through. Which means that any political appointee, ie. Ministers, MECs, etc. can never be fired for not doing their job!
Encouraging ain't it?
Johnfpro
MsLee
Posted 93 days agodisillusionedstill
The 'old' wheel evolved into effective preventions and it is the persistent 'new' re-inventions which do not work.
Maybe go look for old aged pensioners who worked at the old PWD and similar departments?