Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 41708.73
    UP 1.53%
    Top 40 : 3431.07
    UP 2.69%
    Financial 15 : 11956.82
    UP 1.05%
    Industrial 25 : 47564.07
    UP 1.27%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.5937
    UP 1.72%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.5060
    UP 0.75%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.3333
    UP 1.38%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0934
    UP 1.08%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.3661
    UP 1.13%

  • Gold : 1362.2160
    DOWN -2.21%
    Platinum : 1450.5000
    DOWN -2.32%
    Silver : 22.1625
    DOWN -3.00%
    Palladium : 741.5000
    DOWN -0.20%
    Brent Crude Oil : 104.190
    DOWN -0.58%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Tue May 21 16:37:32 SAST 2013

Billions to be spent on arms

GRAEME HOSKEN | 18 April, 2012 00:2327 Comments

As questions surrounding the multibillion-rand arms deal linger, South Africa will be forced to spend billions more in arms acquisitions over the next couple of decades.

The required acquisitions - at a time when the country's defence force capabilities continue to collapse - comes as the DA yesterday revealed that in the past decade R70-billion had flowed through a special defence force slush fund.

Only yesterday, the SA National Defence Force tested the Airbus Military's C295, a light-lift transport and surveillance aircraft, at Air Force Base Waterkloof in Pretoria. The aircraft is being punted as a possible solution to the defence force's collapsed maritime surveillance capabilities.

The defence force has in the next financial year budgeted for plans to begin acquiring maritime surveillance aircraft to protect the country's 3924km coastline.

The defence force at present uses almost obsolete WW2 Dakotas to patrol the country's coastline.

President Jacob Zuma recently called for the reopening of the arms deal inquiry - appointing the Seriti Commission of Inquiry to probe allegations of wrongdoing in the strategic defence procurement packages. The inquiry is expected to spend two years conducting its investigations.

The Defence Review Committee, in releasing its draft report, said the planned acquisitions, which include armoured vehicles, were urgent, especially with piracy threats increasing.

The planned acquisitions have been slammed, with DA defence spokesman David Maynier, revealing that in the past decade R70-billion had passed through a special defence account.

"Much of this would have been spent on capital acquisitions, yet parliament has never been briefed about how the money is spent," he said.

Maynier said that, during apartheid, the account was used as a sanction-busting slush fund.

Rob Thomson, of the anti-armaments lobby group the Ceasefire Campaign, said: "The review is vague and a thumb-suck approach to what we need and why we need what we are told we need. There need to be proper evaluations of what the defence force must do and what threats South Africa faces .

"The acquisitions smack of empire building with the defence industries trying to protect themselves from losses. This is history repeating itself. The last arms deal claimed to be in line with the previous one when it was not. The lack of quantification in the review on what is required is worrying."

Thomson said the review stated that the SANDF was 24% underfunded.

"Yet there is no indication of where these figures come from."

Institute of Security Studies' senior researcher Johan Potgieter said though requirements for new equipment were vital, it was debatable whether the acquisition could be afforded.

"[The] government needs to say what it wants the defence force to do. Once this is done, we can see what we need and if we can afford it," he said.

"We need good governance to avoid gross mismanagement."

Maynier said the joint standing committee on defence had not been briefed on the defence force's acquisition programme contained in the strategic capital acquisition plan.

Defence analyst Helmoed Heitman said the problem was that South Africa had dragged its feet in acquisitions.

"If there was proper planning this massive amount wouldn't occur and we wouldn't sit where we are now. We are fooling ourselves about our defence capabilities.

"Replacements should have been done years ago to spread out costs," Heitman said.

DEFENCE FORCE'S EXPANSION PLANS:

THE SANDF is planning massive expansion projects, says defence analyst Helmoed Heitman. They include:

  • Navy: Estimated total cost R10-billion;
  • Project Saucepan: Maritime surveillance aircraft, estimated at about R320-million each for six aircraft;
  • Project Biro: inshore/offshore patrol vessels. Offshore: eight vessels required at an estimated cost of R470-million each. Inshore: Six vessels at R100 million each;
  • Army: Replace armoured personnel carriers including the Ratel, Mamba, Casspir and Samil trucks;
  • Project Hoefyster: replacement of Ratels with the new Badger - 264 vehicles at cost of R8.8-billion. The actual requirement is 1000 vehicles. The cost includes the development of interior and weapon and turret systems;
  • Project Sepula: replacement project for Mamba and Casspir vehicles. Long-term project to acquire 3000 vehicles. Cost unknown; and
  • Project Vistula: replacement of the army's Samil truck. Long-term project to acquire 3000 vehicles. Cost unknown.
To submit comments you must first

Join the discussion & Debate

Billions to be spent on arms

For Commenters Consideration | Please stick to the subject matter

COMMENTS [27]

Timbuck9

Posted 398 days ago
Avatar
Seems like H.R.H. Sisulu is going on a shoppig spree.... again!

I bet you all the "I's" have been dotted... and the "T's" have been crossed.... and never a word of corruption will leak out..... THIS TIME!!!!!
Avatar

Francis

Posted 398 days ago
Please Timbuck9 a little more respect for our anc trained force. To protect our shores they know very well the difference between a privateering canoe and a captured container ship. Can't understand why you are always so negative about our rulers and protectors.
Avatar

Timbuck9

Posted 398 days ago
Francis..... ROFLMAO!!!!!

Plase don't insult educated people's intelligence....

One thing you forgot... Everything the ANC touches.... BREAKS!!!!!

Fact of Life!!!!!!!!

Avatar

ian16th

Posted 398 days ago
Timbuk9,

You are a fool if you equate education with intelligence.

Many not very intelligent people are well educated, conversely many intelligent people do not receive an education.

BornintheRSA

Posted 398 days ago
Avatar
Why did the current capabilities "collapse”? Without knowing this, how can a new aircraft be punted as the "solution"?

And just by the way - there is no money in the budget to compensate a young man who was permanently brain damaged though the negligence of a Gauteng public official. Priorities are all misplaced.
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 398 days ago
So you suggest the government must use its funds to compensate civilians than securing our borders and coasts?

the_original_MommaCyndi

Posted 398 days ago
Avatar
You left out Project Pocket (possibly the most important and certainly the most expensive) in which a goodly chunk of cash is given out as 'commissions'
Avatar

Ash29

Posted 398 days ago
@ the_original_MommaCyndi

Great 1 :) How much of the R70bln that was used in the past decade was spent on lining officials pockets? I think we also need to ask ourselves, how much of the billions needed will be spent on extravagant holidays abroad, luxury vehicles, homes and clothes? Oh and not forgetting private schooling and university fees for the kids abroad.

a_stub_born

Posted 398 days ago
Avatar
....other projects not mentioned yet are:

Project Marzipan: very malleable and tender....
Project Polyester: made in China....
Project Mbalula:......mmmmph....

and at the moment the most important one from he top:
Project Lobola: replace all the Cobra fittings.......

...there are no estimates as yet, but they will come....don't you worry !!!!!!!.....

Mike123

Posted 398 days ago
Avatar
Why? Are the cadres running out of money?

Francis

Posted 398 days ago
Avatar
MC, also your remark does not sound too friendly.
In project Hoefyster for example is the replacement of Ratels with the new Badger - 264 vehicles for R8.8-billion or R 33.333.333,33 per Badger are all costs included and Ms Sushi has even planned, due to the extremely law cost for such a service, to extend this purchase with another 736 Badgers. Provision is already made that all anc leaders will have their own private attention.
Avatar

the_original_MommaCyndi

Posted 398 days ago
We can rename Ratels to being Badgers until they are coming out of our ears - that is not going to make any difference to the moral, discipline or state of our armed forces. All it will do is create a brand new arms deal in which a political intervention will be required in order to put a newly implicated beneficiary in as President so they can avoid prosecution

Gormogon1

Posted 398 days ago
Avatar
I just do not understand. Awhile back I read that they have no money to fuel the Gripens so our fighter pilots can get the required flight hours to keep their accreditation. Now they want to buy new planes? Who is going to fly them and how are they going to keep them in the sky, when they are short of pilots and money for fuel? Geez man, this is a dumb lot of people.
Avatar

a_stub_born

Posted 398 days ago
""Now they want to buy new planes?""

.....so they can rust in good company.........
Avatar

Gormogon1

Posted 398 days ago
I just continually throw my hands in the air in angry frustration. Unfortunately, demanding answers from people with thick skulls and greedy minds achieves nothing, except raising my blood pressure to dangerous levels.

nghunghunyane

Posted 398 days ago
Avatar
I think the Airforce needs Academically Qualified people to run it, not Teachers...hi Lindiwe S.

So much has gone wrong in the SANDF but there seems not to be a solution. We have solutions to problems which arent clearly documented and presented to the nation, yet we send quotations and motivations for new fleet all the time

Avatar

ian16th

Posted 398 days ago
I believe that Lt. Gen. Carlo Gagiano has all of the necessary qualification to carry out his duties as Chief of the SAAF.

If you believe otherwise, please give your reasons.

chrish

Posted 398 days ago
Avatar
The Secrecy Bill is just in time then - now if anybody dares to blow the whistle on inappropriate dealings (and hence "threaten" "national security") 15 years in prison awaits!

donorfatigued

Posted 398 days ago
Avatar
Call me cynical but I just have to ask 'Whose turn is it to eat now?"
Avatar

m1si2zi3nzo4

Posted 398 days ago
Remember this boss lady requested a disproportionally inflated budget first, but failed. The reason? to "train" our youth in discipline. C'mon, can we try to do better than that?
Avatar

TheUnknownTruth

Posted 398 days ago
Quite obviously it is "Lootfreely" House that needs the money!

m1si2zi3nzo4

Posted 398 days ago
Avatar
Is anyone able to make sense as to whether the nation states are stupid institutions, or whether their citizens are? The urge to spend hard-earned taxes on fruitless sprees seems to be every dictator's dream. What seems to escape everyone of them is that the more one refurbishes his weapons of mass destruction, the more the rest is encouraged to do so. Some are prepared to forsake lives of their citizens, just to feel powerful temporarily. All is in the name of protecting the nation, which is trapped within its borders by restrictive laws. Some claim 'job creation' as the aim, but fail to mention that these are unproductive jobs, and a drop in the ocean.

Since arms purchase cannot protect citizens, nor the dictators - because this role is temporary (except in Mugabe's case, then what pressures are dictators under, other than the urge to feel good. Since these are dead jobs like the SANRAL's, then we are only left with corruption, or massive profiteering by the elite.

Is there any point in protecting a person who is dying of hunger, using his hard earned taxes? Or creating 12000 jobs using jobs by robbing 8million tax payers?
Avatar

nghunghunyane

Posted 398 days ago
@m1si2zi3nzo4


Is there any point in protecting a person who is dying of hunger, using his hard earned taxes? Or creating 12000 jobs using jobs by robbing 8million tax payers?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

This is so true. well unfortunately thats how our Gov thinks, they believe the car should come before the horse

sigh
Avatar

nghunghunyane

Posted 398 days ago
car = cart
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 398 days ago
Maybe the best solution is to put more people in the list of those receiving grants. The government must donate this money to poor people who are going hungry. What do you think m1si2zi3nzo4 ?

VictorMosehla

Posted 398 days ago
Avatar
please give some of that to SANRAL... even if it's just 5%

BobbyBob

Posted 396 days ago
Avatar
Water, electricity, rates, Sanrail, fuel, corruption, theft, mismanagement..... Where will it end? Can we as consumers afford to live here ? Already food and clothing are amongst the most expensive in the world. It is cheaper to buy groceries in the UK than it is here.....

The net result of all this, fewer jobs and more poverty!