Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 41003.25
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Top 40 : 3403.86
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Financial 15 : 11242.53
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Industrial 25 : 47016.52
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • ZAR/USD : 10.0047
    UP 0.05%
    ZAR/GBP : 15.6540
    UP 0.14%
    ZAR/EUR : 13.4025
    UP 0.11%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.1052
    UP 0.45%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.5005
    UP 0.13%

  • Gold : 1366.4950
    DOWN -0.12%
    Platinum : 1433.5000
    DOWN -0.38%
    Silver : 21.6505
    DOWN -0.07%
    Palladium : 707.5000
    UP 0.07%
    Brent Crude Oil : 106.160
    UP 0.13%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Wed Jun 19 08:41:54 SAST 2013

Police blocked from disarming officers

CHANDRÉ PRINCE | 23 April, 2012 00:09
SAPS member. File Picture.
Image by: .

The SA Police Service is locked in a battle with a union over the removal of firearms from more than 27000 officers found unfit to carry them and the placing of seasoned policemen as security guards.

The SA Policing Union made a successful urgent application late last week for an interdict prohibiting Police Minister Nathi Mthethwa and acting national police chief Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi from disarming policemen in all nine provinces who have been declared unfit to handle guns.

Though the union acceded to plans to remove weapons from officers who have been found by the courts to be a danger to their colleagues and the public, its general secretary, Oscar Skommere, said it was unhappy at the way in which provincial police management interpreted a memo from Mkhwanazi's office last month.

Skommere warned that the blanket removal of firearms from these officers would create a perception that none of them were competent to carry firearms. The only way, he said, to resolve the issue was to re-assess the officers' competency.

The confiscation of guns could, he said, endanger the lives of officers who come face-to-face with hardened criminals daily.

"It is a well-documented fact that South Africa is more of a war zone in terms of the rate that police officers are killed. They are violently attacked whether they are on or off duty. To say leaving police officers without firearms is like sending prey to a lion's den is an understatement," said Skommere.

The memo from deputy national commissioner for human resources Magda Stander on March 30 gives an update on national firearms competency.

It states that Mkhwanazi wanted an explanation from provincial and divisional commissioners by April 5 for the authorisation of their police officers to carry firearms after failing competency tests.

The memo is in response to an earlier draft performance audit report, dated December 14, that assessed the quality of police training.

In it, Stander cites the number of officers who failed the competency tests but still carry a firearm.

In Gauteng, 1923 "unfit" officers are still carrying guns, followed by Northern Cape at 1080, Free State 1050, Western Cape 1040, Eastern Cape 520, Limpopo 338, North West 253, Mpumalanga 203 and KwaZulu-Natal 145.

Mkhwanazi has demanded answers on how the provinces will ensure that all officers comply with firearms legislation.

This, however, has led to at least three provinces - North West, Northern Cape and Mpumalanga - implementing different strategies for dealing with officers judged to be unfit to be armed.

"This affects the morale of members and has led to some senseless redeployment," said Skommere.

A subsequent memo from North West states that 314 officers whose firearms have been confiscated, and whose doctors recommended that they be assigned light duties, would be posted as guards at police facilities.

North West employs 100 security guards for police garages, stock-theft units and police offices at R750000 a month and Mkhwanazi wants to put an end to this.

Earlier this month, Mkhwanazi instructed that contracts for security guards not be renewed and that police officers replace the guards.

Hi s instructions specified that officers were to be in uniform and that rotation must take place to ensure that "all members obtain a balance in terms of skills and to ensure that job satisfaction is achieved".

In Mpumalanga, it was ordered that the firearms and accessories of 274 officers from various units - including visible policing, public order policing, organised crime and crime intelligence - be withdrawn before March 30 with "no deviation or excuses".

In Northern Cape, officers were sent a strongly worded memo that stated that any member declared unfit to possesses a firearm but who still had one would be regarded as possessing the firearm illegally.

But this has been temporarily halted after the union won an interdict on Thursday.

"The SAPS is interdicted and restrained from deploying or transferring any SAPS members for the purpose of performing any operational duties without SAPS members being duly assessed and in possession of a competency certificate," the court said.

The matter has been postponed and will be heard on the opposed-motion roll but, said Skommere: "The SAPS management cannot be allowed to expose our members to violent attacks. The proposed disarmament of police officers because they are so-called 'not competent' to carry firearms is not enough."

Skommere said officers who had been declared incompetent were willing to undergo extra training.

He said the union had decided to go to court after failing to persuade the SA Police Service that its stance was "irrational" in the Safety and Sectoral Bargaining Chamber.

Mthethwa's spokesman, Zweli Mnisi, said the minister was merely cited as a respondent as he is the chief executive of the police, but that operational and functional matters were dealt with by the SA Police Service.

Mkhwanazi has admitted that not all police officers had undergone firearms training in compliance with legislation. He said he would charge commanders who allowed unfit policemen to carry guns.

MANY ARMED POLICE A MENACE TO ALL

STUDENT constable Sipho Mbatha killed Soweto teenager Thato Mokoka with an R5 rifle on full automatic mode in February.

It later came to light that Mbatha - now facing a charge of murder - had been declared unfit to carry a firearm and had attempted suicide in December.

Mbatha is one of thousands of South African police officers regarded as a danger to society and their colleagues after failing firearms competency tests.

Only a small percentage of those deemed unfit to carry arms were found to be so because of illnesses such as epilepsy, cerebral haemorrhage or "exhaustion". Most of the 27000 police officers found to be unfit to bear arms were found to be suffering from a serious psychological condition, to have been involved in domestic violence or to have a criminal prosecution pending.

Statistics from North West police paint a picture of a force battling with emotional and psychological disorders affecting members of all ranks - colonels and captains, constables and trainees.

Of the 314 policemen declared unfit to carry a gun in North West, most were diagnosed as suffering from stress, serious depression, bipolar disorder, chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, "psychological complaint", burn-out syndrome, "serious mental health problems" or "headache and stress".

A significant number have had their gun taken away because of criminal intent or suicidal tendencies.

Criminal intent covers firearms used in serious crimes, threats to shoot other officers, attempted murder, pointing firearms, robbery or intimidation.

Some officers have been declared unfit to carry a firearm because of alcohol abuse or because they are receiving anger-management counselling.

A recent internal police report on the quality of police training said that some officers are assigned to duties with firearms that they are not able to use properly.

"That members cannot utilise their firearms with confidence could lead to an increase in police killings," the report said.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

the_original_MommaCyndi

Posted 422 days ago
Avatar
Unions are going to be the death of this country.

As an ordinary citizen, I lose my firearm the minute that I fail a firearms competency test. That is as it should be. The very idea of our unions thinking that a law enforcement officer who can't shoot straight, doesn't know the law and is busy having a mental meltdown, should have a gun - well, that is just too scary for words.
Avatar

SecretVoice

Posted 422 days ago
Correction Momma.
The unions are the death of this country.
Avatar

UDFSupporter

Posted 421 days ago
Let's not throw the baby out with the bath water. There are many companies and small employers still exploiting their workers.I would guess that many citizens classified as casual workers especially those who thousands of "waitrons" that serve us in franchised restaurants are receiving raw deals.

I must, however, agree that SADTU and POPCRU have been and will be the death of democracy and progress in South Africa.
Avatar

the_original_MommaCyndi

Posted 421 days ago
UDFSupporter

Waiters now have to be registered with SARS as well as have letters of contract. The Department of Labour is mandated with ensuring that is done - not the unions.

When last did you hear the unions speak out about anything other than money? My great grandad was one of the people who started unions in SA. They fought against mining hazards such as preventable deaths and lung disease, they didn't fight for 2% more money.
Avatar

Ziyanda_Iintombi_ZaMayaloXaso

Posted 421 days ago
Could not agree with you more. The unions just seem to be fighting for the sake of fighting instead of considering all the angle and implications of an issue. They are even sacrificing the majority of their members with this interdict basically saying that the "rights" of the few are more important that the danger and threat posed to the rest of their members. How they can even think that additional training will remedy the situation is beyond me, when the disarming is mainly due to psychological issues.

BornintheRSA

Posted 422 days ago
Avatar
This does not inspire any confidence in our police officers. It opens the competent and good members to be labelled with the incompetent and bad ones. The union should be striving to get the incompetent ones re-skilled as a matter of urgency. Even a security guard at a police facility should be armed and competent.

Mike123

Posted 422 days ago
Avatar
I think it's also a good idea to arm all five year olds with a can of petrol and a box of matches.
Avatar

Timbuck9

Posted 421 days ago
Not to forget a WELL USED GOODYEAR TYRE!!!!!!!

AWA

Posted 421 days ago
Avatar
Unions rule the economy of this country and will still be the downfall of it. No wonder we are no longer the power house of Africa.

No wonder we are so crime riddled and our police force is in a shambles. We have nitwits armed with guns.

donorfatigued

Posted 421 days ago
Avatar
What a ludicrous situation!

It really is past time to revamp labour legislation and to remove this unwarranted power of the unions - they should have no say over anything to do with competency as judged by the SAPS standards. These SAPS members are unfit to handle firearms and therefore should have those firearms removed until such time as they can prove competence.

Strange is it not that, when citizens applied for a firearm licence on grounds of self-defence, so many were turned down by SAPS saying 'Not convinced of need" - yet now that some SAPS should have their firearms taken away because they are incompetent, there is a pressing need that they should defend themselves!

This is the same organisation which sees no need for citizens to defend themselves against violent armed criminals - who we as citizens, collectively encounter much more often that the cops ever do!

Francis

Posted 421 days ago
Avatar
Fortunately for South Africa that general Cele ordered "shoot to kill".
What if he has said: fire first into the sky?

Ziyanda_Iintombi_ZaMayaloXaso

Posted 421 days ago
Avatar
This is a serious issue. The police union's argument is really irrelevant because these cops are not being disarmed only because of lack of training. These guys have been proven to be mentally unstable to possess a firearm. The union is concerned about the few affected members without taking into account the multitude of police and public whose lives are at stake and being threatened by these cops continuing to carry firearms. The unions are really not being responsible in this instance and are sacrificing the majority to save a few. And really the solution that they are offering of additional training does not address the underlying psychological issues that are the root cause for these police's firearms being taken away.