• All Share : 48826.00
    UP 0.38%
    Top 40 : 4212.72
    UP 0.14%
    Financial 15 : 13797.24
    UP 0.25%
    Industrial 25 : 55546.01
    UP 0.58%

  • ZAR/USD : 10.5799
    UP 0.51%
    ZAR/GBP : 17.7812
    UP 0.42%
    ZAR/EUR : 14.6461
    UP 0.71%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.1033
    UP 0.58%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.8169
    DOWN -0.44%

  • Gold : 1283.9500
    UP 0.03%
    Platinum : 1404.5000
    UP 0.43%
    Silver : 19.4605
    UP 0.11%
    Palladium : 785.5000
    UP 0.45%
    Brent Crude Oil : 109.390
    UP 0.11%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Wed Apr 23 11:27:31 SAST 2014

SABC 3 programme reprimanded for likening Christian Eucharist to cannibalism

Sapa | 20 December, 2012 10:49
File photo.
Image by: Gallo Images/Thinkstock

An SABC3 programme likening the Christian Eucharist to cannibalism included a fundamental error, a tribunal of the Broadcasting Complaints Commission has found.

"The Eucharist is of particular importance to Christians and it is in the public interest that misinformation in this regard not be broadcast," said the tribunal.

A broadcast aired in October of the programme "Shoreline" discussed archaeological evidence for cannibalism.

Presenter Gavin Whitelaw said: "Eating people might be a way of gaining access to some special element, some special essence of the victims. Christians for example eat the blood and the body of Christ so they can absorb some of his purity and godliness."

Christian viewers complained that this statement misrepresented the truth.

In response, SABC3 compliance and regulatory manager Fakir Hassan said complainants were taking the statement "very literally".

"It is obvious that Christians do not and never have literally eaten the blood and body of Christ, although Catholics hold to the idea of transubstantiation, in which bread and wine symbolically become flesh and blood at the time of Communion," he said.

Instead, consuming the "body" and "blood" of Jesus was a symbolic act and a ritual moment of deep significance.

"It is in this context that the presenter made the statement."

SABC3 acknowledged the statement made no clear reference to symbolism and in this may have caused offence.

There was no intention to denigrate Christianity or incite any kind of violence against Christians.

However, the comments were edited to ensure that rebroadcasts did not contain the statement.

In its evaluation, the tribunal found that the programme had erred in its presentation of religion, and this was in the public interest.

However, the programme was typically informative in nature, and SABC3 had immediately re-edited the programme for future broadcasts to rectify the error.

As a result, it found that a reprimand would suffice and a broadcast rectifying the error would not be necessary.

The judgment was released on Tuesday and distributed to the media on Thursday.

The case was heard last month.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.
Wed Apr 23 11:27:31 SAST 2014 ::