FEEDS |

Airbus decision praised

But UK company says it got the news from the media

Nov 5, 2009 10:36 PM | By NKULULEKO NCANA and BRENDAN BOYLE

The manufacturers of the eight military heavy-lift aircraft that were to cost the taxpayer more than R40-billion are up in arms over the Cabinet's decision to scrap the deal.


Current Font Size:
Picture: Airbus
Picture: Airbus

But the government was showered with praise yesterday from across the political spectrum when it announced that it will not buy the A400M aircraft because the "cost escalation would have placed an unaffordable burden" on the taxpayer.

Announcing the Cabinet's decision yesterday, government spokesman Themba Maseko said the "interests of the taxpayer will be best served by not proceeding" with the deal.

He said the decision had been taken two weeks ago, but its implementation was deferred to allow Defence Minister Lindiwe Sisulu to consult others involved and to learn more about its implications.

"We also had to make sure that we communicate with the relevant parties, especially Airbus itself, because you can't enter into a contract with somebody and get them to hear about a decision to pull out through the media and that is why we delayed it," he said.

But Airbus spokesman Linden Birns said the company was "surprised" to learn of the decision from the media yesterday. He said Airbus was even more surprised that the government "moved immediately to cancel" the order instead of following the example of a number of European states that decided to negotiate new delivery dates with Airbus because of delays in the manufacture of the planes.

"We didn't have any reason to believe that the South African government was going to terminate the contract," Birns said.

The government has been under pressure to pull out of the deal, signed in 2005, since Armscor chief executive Sipho Thomo revealed that the initial R17-billion procurement cost had shot up to R47-billion.

There were fears that a decision to pull out of the deal would result in Airbus cancelling various multi-million rand ventures with South African companies - including the state-owned Denel.

Explaining the decision to Parliament's defence portfolio committee yesterday, Sisulu said the government would consider alternatives to the Airbus product.

The Times understands that, before the government announced the termination of the deal, a high-level dele-gation from the ministry of defence and Armscor met Airbus executives in France yesterday morning to tell them of the country's decision.

ANC spokesman Jackson Mthembu said the ruling party welcomed the government's decision. He said the money should be channelled to other government priority areas.

DA MP David Maynier said: "I think that the minister has made exactly the right decision. I and my party support the decision ... but I still feel that we need to investigate this matter."

 Loading...

 or  to comment

Comments

Nov 6 2009 01:22:15 AM
ChickenRunner
user name
The manufacturers should be happy that they pulled out of the deal - how the hell do they think they were going to get paid R40-Billion. There's no money left in the kitty - it has all been stolen already...
Nov 6 2009 05:44:42 AM
beezlebum
user name
...in the face of stinging public criticism. If this was not brought to the public's attention, govt would have gone ahead with the deal.
Now Julius Malema can get his R1 billion!
Nov 6 2009 06:19:26 AM
Garrio
user name
As a non ANC member I want to congratulate the government on this decision. Thank you.
Nov 6 2009 06:26:33 AM
AngelHeart
user name
Assuming a deposit was paid on signing of the deal, this could be a contender for best all time highest profit from any currency trader.

Makes me think that perhaps the politicans are actually quite clever after all (when it comes to money, NOT implementing policy, that is).

Assuming a deposit of EUR100 million was paid up at R7.93 / EUR (Average for 2005), means a payment of R793 million.

This weeks average R11.54/EUR (or R1.154 billion if using EUR 100 million).

Net profit over 4 years (just for the currency gain) is a 45.5%, which, over this assumed Eur 100 million is about R3.61 million. Less a few hundred thousand for bank charges (of which government is exempt), and the trouble of having to bank the cheque.

Alternatively, if Aurbus waits to pay up, then in a couple of months, when the currency hits R12 or R13 to the Euro, then the profit from cancelling this deal becomes higher.

Brilliant!

I wish I could do the same.
Nov 6 2009 07:33:45 AM
Ju-Ju-LICIOUS
user name
Eish now I can imagine it. We demanded the gvt to send back the expensive German cars. So in xchange they decide to substitute 4 airbuses. Imagine the traffic on air with all 34 ministers rushing off 2 their Pretoria offices. Wonder wat made em change their minds? Nt enough parking space @ the back of their yards
Nov 6 2009 08:02:50 AM
DavidD
user name
No doubt Africa_need_No_link_to_europe
will welcome this decision to snub the racist European capitalist military/industrial corporations and suggest we use a traditional form of transport and send our troops into Africa on Lesotho ponies.
Nov 6 2009 08:20:43 AM
Vlad
user name
You think Airbus wants their Bribe Money back?

Suppose the question is.... is that person still in that top position?
Nov 6 2009 09:03:25 AM
Suek
user name
The govt wants the UK 2.6 billion or so for the airbuses refunded, but the govt did not refund Amandla Forklifts for the money they robbed from my ex boss and he was black. SAPO did what these European companies did and ripped them off. Amandla (a BEE company) was liquidated because of crookery and was forced to close down.

Now the govt can feel. Its about time they were given their own medicine. I have no sympathy as I saw what they did to Enock Mthembu. Pity the taxpayer has to suffer for the ANC's bugger ups. The ANC could not organise a piss up in a brewery, and the European arms dealers know how brainless they are and are taking these nincompoops who call themselves politicians for a ride.

Lets have some real politicians for a change
Nov 6 2009 09:10:37 AM
Shoot2kill
user name
I foresee a day coming when we forge concessions with other African countries to drill oil, mine coal and diamonds, build resorts and pipelines. Companies will drink champagne in the board-rooms and the Government will be praised for building good diplomatic relations with such countries.

Equipment, people and machinery will be sent to start operations, infrastructural developments to build better roads, facilities, harbours and airport will be rolled out. We will be happy to invest our taxes on such developments and we will see growth of South Africa becoming an African superpower, with all companies talking about "offshore" investments as an alternative to our shrinking gold, platinum, coal and farming resources.

Then when all has been said and done, like mushrooms out of nowhere, rebels will rise up and hold us into ransom and claim everything. Our military will take days to get to areas of defence and by then millions will be lost, together with investor confidence and we will think back to these decisions and ask ourselves, "What if we had a heavy-lift aircraft that would have carried a dozen tankers and a thousand soldiers to deploy to the area? We would then have been a real superpower.

Then, with tails between our legs, we would retreat back to our country and France, Belgium and US would pay rebels their promised share for a job well done and they would take over from where we left off and say to themselves, "Once more South Africa has cleared the path for us at their own expense."

Decisions like these will come back to bite us. The prices were indeed inflated and it would have been ridiculous to purchase at this time but we should have been more diplomatic and renegotiated than burn the bridges the way we did.

Mark my words!
Nov 6 2009 09:14:41 AM
Pricklong
user name
Foolish and populist decision. An opportunity lost and a further slide towards deindustrialisation! Mark my words, soon we will hear about litigation and cancellation fees, etc, etc.



Today's Topics