FEEDS |

'Law is holding us back': Zille

Nov 10, 2009 10:19 PM | By LAUREN COHEN

Western Cape premier Helen Zille has given President Jacob Zuma a list of changes she wants made to laws that, she says, hamper service delivery in provincial government.


Current Font Size:
Helen Zille
Helen Zille

Related Articles

Zille raised the issue of red tape with Zuma at a meeting in August at which he agreed to follow up on her submissions.

More than 70 suggestions for amendments have been made by the provincial treasury and another nine departments.

"These include calls for national planning legislation to be simplified to avoid excessive delays to projects like housing and basic services," Zille said at a press conference.

"In some cases, up to four different laws require four different public participation processes for one project."

Zille cited the example of successive impact assessments, which took three years to complete.

"If the public participation processes could be dealt with at the same time, we could save two and a half years."

Zille said her submission for legislative change also raised the question of ports, which were "controlled by Transnet but not always run in a manner that benefits regional economics and communities".

Other suggestions by the DA leader include the amending of the SA Schools Act of 1996 to provide for random search and drug seizures at schools by professionals instead of by over-burdened principals.

It was suggested that relieving principals of this task would contribute to better performances at schools.

 Loading...

 or  to comment

Comments

Nov 11 2009 12:39:16 AM
TheVillageBoy_with a diploma
user name

Now that you want everything to go your way, you will just pretend as if we have forgotten that one of your tactics to lure votes from pale pinkies, you kept using and or scaring people that the ANC is threatning to change the constitution and people should vote for you so as to safeguard the constitution or avoid any future changes....now ypu are pushing the ANC to amend the constitution...and that nonsensical rhetoric has now been thrown out of the window.

What a hipocrite !....
Your sheeples are too blind to see your duplicity....poor things!
Nov 11 2009 02:10:21 AM
Merlot
user name
could you not see the sense in that message ? Have you got your dimmers on ?

We have got far too much red tape - things need to happen quicker - people are starving - don't you care ?
Nov 11 2009 02:24:56 AM
Gintsa-the-spinsta
user name
Nov 11 2009 02:10:21 AM
Merlot

I think what my "learnered" friend is trying to state is that during her campaign Botox-queen was toting the constitution as the all-encompassing Dogma, thus she should have studied the document first before assuming that all it states is incontrovertible to a stage where any proposed amendments to it would be disastrous as she was predicting. She is a hypocrite though.
Nov 11 2009 03:18:25 AM
Tackler
user name
The national constitution simply IS the all-encompassing "dogma" which every other lesser law has to obey in order for it to be legal.

If you don't grasp that easy, simple, very basic reality, you're way out of your depth in ANY discussion about law.

Altering the constitution is possible, but only with a two-thirds majority. The ruling regime does not have a 2/3 majority and so are unable to change the constitution without the active consent of the opposition parties.
Nov 11 2009 03:36:06 AM
Dukeboy
user name
Nov 11 2009 02:24:56 AM
Gintsa-the-spinsta
I think what my "learnered" friend is trying to state ...


Right .... one idjit second guessing another idjit.

Reference to amendments to the Constitution was made WHERE in this article?
Nov 11 2009 03:44:00 AM
Gintsa-the-spinsta
user name
Nov 11 2009 03:36:06 AM
Dukeboy

Now, pay careful attention as I am only going to say this once, RE-READ WHAT I SAID PERHAPS ALL THAT KLIPPIES-AND-COKE WILL DRY OUT YOUR OTHERWISE HOLLOW SKULL AND YOU'LL REALISE I DON'T REFER TO AMENDMENTS IN THIS ARTICLE, RATHER DURING HER CAMPAIGN TRAIL.

BIG, BOLD LETTERS JUST FOR YOU. Could even help if you use your finger to block out the next letter before reading seems your mind fails to comprehend a full word.
Nov 11 2009 04:03:04 AM
Gintsa-the-spinsta
user name
Nov 11 2009 03:51:28 AM
Dukeboy

No your not naive, just plain stooopid!
If you fail to connect the dots of my statement and post, then there is not much I can do for you. probably has something (a lot really) to do with your sub-30 IQ.

Now, Go put together a 10-piece puzzle, don't worry, I'll still be here by next week.
Nov 11 2009 04:31:03 AM
Billy Hill
user name
Be very careful of the agenda Zille has, which is not in the best interests of the country and it's people. She is a stooge for western interests and will sell the nations assets and enslave it's people if she's given half a chance.

She and her pathetically naive supporters must be stopped.
Nov 11 2009 04:33:53 AM
Billy Hill
user name
The constitution will be changed by the people for the people when the time comes, not because some rabid spitting snarling colonialist wants changes.
Nov 11 2009 04:36:32 AM
Billy Hill
user name
Ginsta, Dukebooi can't understand more than two sentences strung together and has less of a vocabulary than my dog.


Today's Topics