FEEDS |

Farmers protected from Zimbabwe deal

Nov 26, 2009 4:04 PM | By Sapa

South African farmers in Zimbabwe will not forfeit their land or investments as a result of a bilateral agreement still to be signed, a Pretoria judge ordered.


Current Font Size:

Photograph by: TSVANGIRAYI MUKWAZHI
Credit: AP
quote It's a victory for the rule of law and it has spared the South African government the embarrassment of being unable to sign the agreement quote

Related Articles

Related Blogs

Responding to an urgent application to halt the signing of the promotion and reciprocal protection of investments agreement (Bippa) Judge Roelof du Plessis congratulated both parties for reaching a settlement.

"This is a big step the government [of South Africa] has taken. I believe this order is going to go far in assisting our citizens who have investments in Zimbabwe," he said.

The order also upheld government's assurance that it honoured a Southern African Development Community (SADC) tribunal finding that Zimbabwe's land reform programme was discriminatory.

This means that while the order protects investments from the time of the signing of Friday's agreement, South Africans who have already lost their land to expropriation will have to cite the tribunal finding in claims for compensation.

Lobby group Afriforum who brought the application alongside Zimbabwean farmers said the Bippa was generally understood to have the effect to exclude the enforcement of the SADC tribunal's orders, and to exempt Zimbabwe from liability for past human rights violations.

They believed it contravened South Africa's Constitution and international law and had been unable to discuss it with the trade and industry minister.

Speaking outside the court, Afriforum's legal representative Willie Spies said it was a "huge victory".

"It's a victory for the rule of law and it has spared the South African government the embarrassment of being unable to sign the agreement. It's a good day for Zimbabweans."

Spies said, however, it had been unfortunate that the government had been forced to court to hear the plight of its citizens across the border.

"It is actually a pity, unfortunately we only got this settlement after filing papers," he said.

Farmer and applicant in the matter Louis Fick - who faces prosecution for failing to vacate his farm in Zimbabwe - said he was "very relieved".

"We have been trying to get the government involved," Fick said adding that farmers had been battling for nine years.

"I am relieved that our protection has been granted. As we speak, three farmers have been klapped [had their farms taken away]. It's never stopped in Zimbabwe."

When asked if he felt the ruling might aid in his defence against a prison term he said: "I hope so, but I'm not unrealistic about Zimbabwe."

The tribunal referred to took place in November 2008. It said Zimbabwe's land reform programme "constituted racial discrimination, an infringement of the right of access to courts, and an arbitrary taking without adequate compensation, each in breach of Zimbabwe's treaty obligations".

Business Unity SA said it would travel to Harare to observe the signing, but would not participate as it had not been consulted, nor seen the terms.

A legal representative for government would not comment on the record.

 Loading...

 or  to comment

Comments

Nov 26 2009 04:19:58 PM
Stirrer
user name
"...as a result of a bilateral agreement still to be signed..."

I wouldn't get too excited just yet - Mugabe can still tell them "you keep your South Africa, and Ill keep my Zimbabwe"!
Nov 26 2009 04:25:54 PM
TheVillageBoy_with a diploma
user name

Thanks to the ANC led government.

All our food producers--regardless of their racist tendencies, greed, egocentric, superficial mentality, and race--would be highly protected from abuse, torture, ceisure, rapes and all the rubbish that occurs in the Banana republic next door.

ANC my vision
Nov 26 2009 04:26:17 PM
august rain
user name
Zimbabwe's land reform programme was discriminatory NO! WAY!
Nov 26 2009 04:57:06 PM
samurai14
user name
And it took them a tribunal to figure that out...
Nov 26 2009 05:01:47 PM
Afrocentric Vibes2024
user name
there's no way it was discriminatory, what was discriminatory and sickening was the manner in which the UK , Westminster cronies to be precise deceived Zim for decades, Ian Smith aka account, kunzima
Nov 26 2009 05:46:58 PM
hoodoo
user name
Mugabe is a dead man walking. His junta are very worried. Soon there will be serious questions asked...
Nov 26 2009 06:01:43 PM
mcritic
user name
Afrocentriic. The only thing here was that Mugabe's Government was granted assistance to buy out land for the benefit of Black Zimbabweams/ However, the end result was that the ZANU-PF used to assistance to enrich themselves by allocation of virtually all the really profitable farms to the crooking zanu-PF's. They then asset-stippd the land and there is no farming on them at present.

Honest land reform is supported by everyone - crokking caused the disaster which is the Ziimbabwe economy at present.

The moral fo teh story is - Westminster gave the money = Mugabe and co stole it. They have massive amounts of money held in foreign bannk accounts and they want it released - so they shout about saqnctions..

Nov 26 2009 06:05:13 PM
Mommacyndi
user name
LOL
Did the tooth fairy rattify it?
Nov 26 2009 07:16:55 PM
Phaedioux
user name
Are there any SA farmers/investors left there?

If so, we must surely protect them - what a resilient bunch - priceless!
They are worth their weight tenfold in gold!
Nov 26 2009 08:31:43 PM
Tongogara
user name
WOW.....

Good for them. I like farmers.....primary economy must always be respected...its these derivative guys that messed us up so good one for the farmers......

As for Zim history.....like CODESA the LAncaster Agreement was fataly flawed!!\

RIght now the issue is food security our Fathers sold us ot signing these agreement but its too late now to undo that mess its better to focus on now!



Today's Topics