FEEDS |

SA Press takes issue over Fifa's bullying

Jan 28, 2010 11:17 PM | By SALLY EVANS

South Africa's three largest newspaper groups have joined forces to send a submission to Fifa to inform them that the terms and conditions they imposed on journalists during the 2010 World Cup are "unconstitutional".


Current Font Size:
Fifa president Sepp Blatter
Fifa president Sepp Blatter
Photograph by: Mark Baker
Credit: AP

In a written submission to Fifa and the local organising committee, Avusa Media Limited, Independent Newspapers and Media 24 have said restrictions outlined by Fifa "unjustifiably restrict the media's ability to report critically on the Fifa World Cup and any related or ancillary topics".

The submissions, handed to the soccer body on Wednesday by Johannesburg law firm Webber Wentzel on behalf of all three newspaper houses, state that Fifa "holds a monopoly over all matters pertaining to the 2010 Fifa World Cup".

It further argues that because of this monopoly, the media "effectively has no choice but to comply with Fifa's requirements concerning accreditation if they wish to attend and report on games, and if they wish to report on the event".

Legal counsel for the three groups submitted that "the unilateral imposition by Fifa of terms and conditions is subject to the Constitution".

Several of Fifa's provisions have been challenged on the basis that they "unjustifiably" restrict all types of reporting by directly interfering "with the right of the media to publish, without interference, commentary or opinion on matters related to the Fifa World Cup and that they are plainly unconstitutional".

Fifa's terms and conditions state that news organisations may not "harm the reputation of the Fifa World Cup" or "engage in conduct which expresses ... charity or ideological concern [sic] related views, which could impair the enjoyment of the Fifa World Cup by other spectators, or detract from the sporting focus of the Fifa World Cup".

The newspaper groups submitted that under South African law, "a prior restraint on publication" is in itself unlawful and that "publication is lawful or justifiable on the basis that it is true and in the public interest, protected by fair comment or is reasonable."

Furthermore, Fifa's accreditation terms are "procedurally unfair, unlawful and unconstitutional."

Organising committee spokesman Richard Mkhondo confirmed he received the submission, and that "we are still looking at it".


 or  to comment

Comments

Jan 29 2010 01:02:37 AM
Merlot
user name
I agree completely - FIFA too big for their boots !
Jan 29 2010 01:09:35 AM
PinkAndProud
user name
Well done to the media for standing up to the FIFA bullys. All the ANC does is lick their ....
Jan 29 2010 02:57:23 AM
grant9
user name
Is the WC 2010 going to be worse than I expect?
What has FIFA got to hide?
Has FIFA not heard the term 'press fredom'?
Has FIFA applied similar restrictions before to previous WC events?
Jan 29 2010 06:35:33 AM
Pleb
user name
Blatter is a jerk!
Jan 29 2010 07:06:49 AM
k'hallawaya
user name
very familiar eh?....You must not talk bad about the highest..........
Jan 29 2010 07:21:24 AM
pommie abroad
user name
Muzzling the press, what are they scared of ? If it all goes pair shaped surely the sponsors have a right to know????
Jan 29 2010 07:30:43 AM
ANCisCorrupt
user name
It is not the press freedom world cup, it is the FIFA nazi world cup.

Ven I blow ze vistle.......
Jan 29 2010 07:31:31 AM
ANCisCorrupt
user name
Blatter,

First you bribe them, then you lose control of them, welcome to Africa!
Jan 29 2010 09:09:25 AM
zonzo
user name

Blatter is NOT Zuma. He's not taking this SA press trash of cooking up filth and tabloit stories. You go boy - Sir Sepp Blatter!!! You GO boy!!!
Jan 29 2010 09:43:17 AM
blakat
user name
There are a few sides to this story:

1) Whose constitution is valid here? Does FIFA have to operate in terms of our constitution or did we, in our agreement with them, screw that one up?

2) Maybe FIFA simply prefers us NOT to politicize matters since we are well known for politicizing everything.

3) Maybe FIFA is simply full of $%#@