FEEDS |

'EU farms give off too much gas'

Study says their emissions should be included in protocol

Nov 22, 2009 10:36 PM | By Reuters

Greenhouse gas emissions from European livestock and fertilisers exceed the carbon absorption of all the region's trees and soils, underlining the need to cap farms' contribution to climate change, a study shows.


Current Font Size:

Photograph by: Sydney Seshibedi

Under the Kyoto Protocol, rich countries do not have to include agriculture in their national emission targets.

Plants, including trees and grasses, suck the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide out of the air as they grow, in a "carbon sink" effect which helps to balance man-made emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But European farms also add to climate change as a result of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock and fertilisers.

Farming emissions wiped out the region's entire carbon sink benefit from trees and plants, the study showed.

"We were surprised about the magnitude of the net effect," said Detlef Schulze, director of the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, and lead author of the study published in Nature Geoscience.

Under the Kyoto Protocol, countries can choose whether to include farming greenhouse gas emissions, and Germany, for example, has chosen to include forests - which absorb carbon - and ignore agriculture, he said.

Schulze recommended that farming was included in cap and trade schemes.

"We should do greenhouse gas trade. He who emits must pay, and he who sequesters [carbon] should earn something."

The study found that European Union forests, grasses and soil sucked 125-million tonnes of carbon out of the air annually from 2000 to 2005. That offset some 12% of just over one billion tonnes of carbon emissions from fossil fuels.

But when farming was added, the net effect was the emission of 34-million tonnes of carbon equivalent into the atmosphere.

 Loading...

 or  to comment

Comments

Nov 23 2009 06:22:13 AM
SkewView
user name
On a scale of 1-10 on gas emissions, where would Julius Malema fit in?
Nov 23 2009 06:23:18 AM
shrott
user name
Bring back the times, when palm trees were flourishing near the North Pole! The global warming idiots have it all wrong!
Nov 23 2009 06:24:39 AM
shrott
user name
Close down the Kruger National Park because the Elephants emit green house gases, and kill 2 billion human beings who are farting all day long!
Nov 23 2009 08:46:01 AM
Spitfire
user name
Top IPCC climate scientists have been BUSTED fraudulently changing data to suit their own agenda. Shows the earth has been COOLING not getting warmer!! Read about it at http://wattsupwiththat.com/
Nov 23 2009 09:30:28 AM
Eric
user name
Listen here: http://www.2gb.com/index2.php?option=com_newsmanager&task=view&id=5149


What a hoax!!!!!!!!!!
Nov 23 2009 09:33:27 AM
TheWisdom
user name
Ok, now where must the cows sh!t?
Nov 23 2009 10:27:45 AM
Mommacyndi
user name
'EU farms give off too much gas'

..... but not half as much as politicians
Nov 23 2009 12:52:34 PM
Modder
user name
Spitfire, I see you also enjoy good websites.

The whole global warming industry (and that is exactly what it is, a multi-billion dollar industry) is based on scare-mongering, manipulation of information and control.

In the long-distant past, the atmospheric CO2 concentrations were much higher than now, with cooler temperatures.

Here is an interesting article titled Climatologists baffled by global warming time-out. Very interesting reading. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,662092,00.html
Nov 23 2009 07:34:08 PM
Spitfire
user name
Thanks Modder - will check it out. You might be interested to know that one of the UEA/IPCC scientists , Phil Jones has collected a staggering 13.7 million British pounds ($22.6 million) in grants since 1990. The major amounts came from HEFCE (6.6 million pounds) and NERC (2.7 million pounds).
I hope this guy goes to jail for a long time!!
Nov 23 2009 08:23:00 PM
Phaedioux
user name
Nov 23 2009 12:52:34 PM
Modder
"The whole global warming industry (and that is exactly what it is, a multi-billion dollar industry) is based on scare-mongering, manipulation of information and control."
-------------------------------------
Sounds remarkably similar to current SA politics!

They must be using the same tacticians?


Today's Topics