Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE &
Business LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
Sat May 26 13:28:20 SAST 2012

Walmart-Massmart merger poses risk to SA: ministers

Sapa | 02 August, 2011 11:366 Comments
While Walmart and Massmart executives were being grilled at the Competition Tribunal about their intentions, workers gathered outside the Department of Trade and Industry in Pretoria to register their opposition to any deal between the US retail giant and the SA company. File picture.
Image by: KATHERINE MUICK-MERE

The R16.5-billion takeover of Massmart by US retail giant Walmart poses a risk to the SA economy if more stringent conditions are not applied to the merger agreement, says the government.

The merger, as it stood, threatened to cause a decline in local manufacturing and production, it said in a statement issued by Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies, Agriculture and Forestry Minister Tina Joemat Pettersson and Economic Development Minister Ebrahim Patel on Tuesday.

The three ministers filed papers with the Competition Appeal Court last month seeking to have the Competition Tribunal's decision to approve the merger set aside.

At a media briefing in Pretoria on Tuesday, video-linked to Cape Town, Patel said the government would be derelict in its duty if it did nothing "when there is clear and compelling evidence of probable job losses or deterioration in the working conditions of SA workers due to increased imports as a result of the proposed transaction".

For this reason, it was trying to get more appropriate conditions attached to the conditions of the merger.

Patel declined to reveal details of these new conditions but said there needed to be "better protection for jobs in the Massmart supply chain than what we currently have in place".

On the question of whether it would not be better to negotiate with Walmart -- which is taking a 51% stake in the local retailer -- rather than go to court, he said efforts had been made in this regard but had not proved successful.

"It is within the capacity of Walmart to agree to a fair and reasonable set of conditions, which will ensure that South Africa as a whole benefits from the entry of the company into the local market.

"The failure by Walmart to agree to such conditions, or offer reasonable or binding commitments, is regrettable.

"We have a simple request: Please ensure your entry into the local market results in a net increase in jobs and local production capacity.

"In the absence of reasonable commitments, government has no option but to pursue the matter through the courts," he said.

In their joint statement, the ministers spelled out the main risk they believe the merger poses.

"The main risk to South Africa that the merger poses is an increase in imports by Walmart-Massmart, causing a decline in local manufacturing and production."

This risk was across a wide range of consumer product sectors, including agro-processing, the furniture industry, electronics, plastics and household goods, as well as clothing and textiles.

"These effects, if realised, will lead to the closure of a number of local businesses and local job losses," they said.

The sheer scale of Walmart's international operations had made government intervention necessary.

"Walmart's revenue is estimated to be US$408-billion [about R2.7- trillion] -- larger than South Africa's GDP. In 2004, Walmart, if it was measured as a country, would have been China's eighth-largest trade partner and would have a GDP larger than 75% of countries worldwide.

"In 1995, no more than 5% of Walmart products were imported; by 2005, this figure had increased exponentially to 60%. Walmart's procurement division employs 1 400 employees, sourcing from 6 000 factories across the world, though largely from China.

"Government believes that given Walmart's global purchasing power, the merged entity will significantly increase imports and reduce purchases from local suppliers in South Africa.

"This will affect entire value chains -- from the suppliers of raw materials and components, to the producers of the finished product.

"Government believes a ripple effect in the sector is inevitable; competitors of the merged entity will also respond by importing more and procuring less from local suppliers," they said.

Davies told the briefing it would be a mistake to construe the government's intervention in the merger as signalling its attitude towards foreign investment

"We're dealing with a large merger between a foreign investor and an entity which is already dominated by foreign interests.

"So the fact is that, as a general proposition, this is a statement that says something about the approach of government towards foreign investment, that is just completely mistaken," he said.

Joemat-Pettersson warned the merger could pose a threat to South Africa's food security through its impact on the agro-processing and farming sectors.

The Walmart-Massmart merger was approved by the Competition Tribunal of SA on May 31, subject to certain conditions. The SA Commercial, Catering and Allied Workers' Union has appealed against this clearance.

The tribunal's decision has been welcomed by both Walmart and Massmart.

At public hearing on the merger in parliament last month, the government indicated it was not seeking to veto the deal but believed public interest concerns made a review essential.

To submit comments you must first

Join the discussion & Debate

Walmart-Massmart merger poses risk to SA: ministers

For Commenters Consideration | Please stick to the subject matter

COMMENTS [6]

dwnwitjuju

Posted 298 days ago
Avatar
Why would we want cheaper goods for all? Affordable quality goods that everyone can afford? Way to go ANC govt - you always manage to stuff things up!

Ntebaleng

Posted 298 days ago
Avatar
Good work cmrde Patel - we need value-add in this country not just cheap consumerable (products) - we have a lot of unemployement and we need development and cheap products certainly do not address that if they are going to destroy business for my beloved Pick 'n Pay and Shoprite Checkers(OK) - my beloved Spar and Woolies - let them come in only if they are not going to use our country for a spring board to other African country's market - we need more thatn they are offering - the current retail sector is providing more than what Wal-Mart intends to bring in - capital investment only will not cut it - we need development and employement - a lot of employment - these all foreign business it does not plough back to the country - Wal-Mart are like parasites - they run business like pests - the will not assist in anyway in this country - the consumer tribunal is thinking like business - no long term focus

nkosipeter

Posted 298 days ago
Avatar
A case of the left hand and the right hand? So confusing that the Govt is taking itself to Court!

This is Monty Python stuff.

Has Patel created a single job yet?

Promised 5 mill by 2020, already lost 170 000, so 5 170 000 to go.

Revise the promise Mr Patel, but first ban or seriously discourage foreign fixed investment. Continue to debate the nationalisation of mines and banks.

Your revised promise will be a negative number.



suek

Posted 297 days ago
Avatar
You in Sa want cheaper imported goods? NZ has free trade agreements with China,USA among other countries.We love it as things are cheaper that way.Wallmart will alo bring jobs as they could be successful and open more stores than Masmart has.Look on the even brighter side, you might be lucky enough to be transferred to their USA branch
Avatar

dwnwitjuju

Posted 297 days ago
Well said suek!

But no, alas, everything western is of the white capitalist making and no good here in deep dark Africa - hahahahaha. I am still waiting for the cANCers to swear off their BMWs, Mercs, Audis, etc. Those are western, but I guess that doesn't matter...

Rightway

Posted 297 days ago
Avatar