Parliament mum on info bill process

29 September 2011 - 18:55 By Sapa
subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now
Censored. File photo.
Censored. File photo.
Image: Gallo Images/Thinkstock

The Speaker's office has dismissed concern about the legitimacy of the ANC's new parliamentary consultation process on the Protection of State Information Bill.

"There is no confusion," spokeswoman Sukhthi Naidoo said on Thursday after opposition MPs and civil society challenged the ANC's decision to invite new submissions without setting up a multiparty committee to hear these.

Naidoo said the ANC, or any other party, could do "whatever it likes" in terms of inviting public input on the bill.

She pointed out the bill had not been withdrawn from parliament, saying the debate on it had merely been postponed.

"For us, it is a simple scheduling issue. There is no sense of what is going to happen next."

Naidoo said there were three options on how to proceed.

First, the bill could be referred anew to a parliamentary committee for deliberation.

Second, it could be tabled for debate by an MP, with amendments; or third, it could be put to the National Assembly as is and rejected.

Opposition MPs reacted with outrage on Tuesday after ANC chief whip Mathole Motshekga invited interest groups to make submissions on the state secrecy bill to a task team of ruling party MPs.

His office said it would "afford particularly individuals and formations, which are yet to have a say on the bill, an opportunity to do so".

Motshekga withdrew the bill last week from the National Assembly programme for debate a day before it was expected to be passed, amid reports of a split in senior party echelons about the legislation.

It encountered a wall of opposition when it was first introduced, with critics calling it a return to apartheid-era repression.

The opposition saw the ANC's call for submissions from previously silent quarters as an attempt to counteract continued resistance to the bill, including threats of a Constitutional Court challenge.

The Right 2 Know Campaign, at the forefront of protest against the legislation, said the ANC process seemed intended as a sweetheart exercise.

"I think we understand that quite clearly there is not really an appetite to change the bill, but we must not allow this process to be stage-managed," said the group's co-ordinator, Murray Hunter.

The campaign wrote to the Speaker's office on Thursday, demanding clarity on how the renewed consultation and any potential amendments would be handled.

"We are... of the view that while the ANC, as well as any other political party, has the right to solicit opinion, it should not do so to the exclusion or substitution of a proper parliamentary process," the group wrote.

"We would submit that the bill needs to be referred to a properly constituted parliamentary portfolio or ad hoc committee whose task it would then be to garner further public opinion on behalf of parliament as a democratic institution."

Asked whether the Speaker's office was responding to the letter, Naidoo pointed out that parliament was in recess.

subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now