No more free flights for former presidents
Image by: GUY TILLIM/AFP
Former presidents and deputy presidents will not be allowed domestic travel paid for by the state until next year.
Former presidents Nelson Mandela, Thabo Mbeki and FW de Klerk, and former deputy presidents Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka and Baleka Mbete, are among those affected by "serious budgetary constraints" being experienced by President Jacob Zuma's office.
The Times can reveal that the former top politicians were over the past two weeks notified that their travel and subsistence allowances for the rest of year have been cut but would resume in the new financial year, which starts in April.
The two-paragraph letter, headed "Benefits of Executive Office", reads: "The Presidency is currently experiencing serious budgetary constraints and unfortunately the budget that was allocated to you for travel and subsistence has been exhausted. We are therefore not in the position to fund any further flights until 31 March 2012. This benefit will resume with effect 1 April 2012."
The policy of executive benefits allows former presidents and deputy presidents an unlimited number of journeys on scheduled commercial domestic flights.
Yesterday, the offices of both Mbeki and De Klerk confirmed that the former heads of state had received letters notifying them of the temporary cancellation of their benefits, but they refused to elaborate on how this would affect them.
Mbeki's spokesman, Mukoni Ratshitanga, said the development would "obviously impact negatively on the former president's programme, as indeed on other similarly situated officers".
"He has received the letter from the Presidency and so he accepts what the Presidency has got to say. It is not as if he has a choice about it," said Ratshitanga.
De Klerk's personal assistant, Brenda Steyn, confirmed that he received the letter on Wednesday.
Mlambo-Ngcuka's letter, dated November 9, was signed by the secretary of the cabinet on November 14.
Mlambo-Ngcuka is in the UK and is not aware of the cuts.
Nelson Mandela Foundation spokesman Sello Hatang said he was not in a position to comment.
A senior government official yesterday questioned the cuts, describing them as "quite a bizarre situation".
"Was the money exhausted on Zuma and all his wives? The Presidency needs to explain what happened to the budget," said the official. He added that some ex-presidents still did state-related work supported by the allowance.
Presidential spokesman Zanele Mngadi said last night that the cuts had been necessitated by the economic climate and that staff have been told to reduce expenditure.
"The Presidency is also exploring economy class travel for senior managers up to chief director level as part of the cost-saving measures. All units within the Presidency have been informed about cost-cutting measures and they have all accepted what is now called inside the Union Buildings the 'financial diet'.''
She said it was "grossly misleading" to suggest that Zuma's spouses were considered a serious cost factor as the spousal unit was a "very tiny component" of the Presidency and was also participating in the cost-cutting campaign.
In September, Zuma was accompanied to New York by both his wife Thobeka Madiba and fiancee, Bongi Ngema-Zuma, to attend a session of the UN General Assembly.
In March last year it was revealed that taxpayers would spend more than R15-million on supporting Zuma's three wives and some of his 20 children for the 2010-2011 financial year.
The travel cut comes six months after Mbeki was forced to take four different flights to reach war-torn Sudan after charter flights, paid for by the Presidency, were withdrawn.
In February, the Sunday Times revealed that the Presidency was unhappy about Mbeki's travels to Sudan. An internal memo said they were costly, "unsustainable" and "will require some changes".
The government spent more than R20-million on 11 charter flights for Mbeki's Sudan missions between April 2009 and October last year.





Join the discussion & Debate
No more free flights for former presidents
For Commenters Consideration | Please stick to the subject matterCOMMENTS [41]
BornintheRSA
Posted 176 days agoNow parliament needs to address Zuma's ever growing household as well.
Truth-Speaker
theBrother
If the president wants to take another wife, it is fine. There is nothing wrong with an African man to have more than one wife. If he adheres to certain guidelines then it is fine.
VNdaba
2) How is this budget appropriated ? 2m for 11 flights is over R 180 000 per flight ! is that even possible , not forgetting that its still in 1 continent ?
3)Surely any cuts would be based on merit , eg : Mandela's medical visits and general health should outweigh flying a member of an ever expanding first family member from zululand to Joburg for a wedding/get a hug / whatever
4)How are these very different agendas under 1 budget ? Obviously if you are going to buy 2 new jets for the pres & vp you would knowingly exhaust it if its all in one pot !
5) Has it occurred to anybody else as it has to me , that whatever team of fools that is managing this budget is also somehow involved in how the country manages our other tax income !?
Nostradamus
Nostradamus
How can you be so ignorant???? I don't think that anybody has a problem with your polygamist culture or how many wives the President chooses to take, but how do you justify R15M/annum in tax money being allocated for his oversized family which keeps growing. Budgets are being exhausted and the President sets a wonderful example, obviously oblivious, or indifferent to the appropriation of tax payers money.
I984
Posted 176 days agoIsn't the travel allowances fund for FORMER presidents and deputy presidents separate from the fund for the CURRENT ones? And what happened to the budget indeed? Ah, let me guess - classified information...
PRADO
Posted 176 days agoamaKK
Nostradamus
PRADO
PieterVenter
Mzungu
Posted 176 days agofresh jokes every day!!
4 wives, +20 kids, umpteen concubines, what else?
amaKK
Posted 176 days ago- Temporary/fill-in office bearers (Mothantle, Mlambo-Ngcuka and Mbete) should never be permitted to retain full benefits of the office they hold as a stop-gap.
- Why on earth are two of Zuma's spouses taken on the same trip? Did they not say it was one wive per trip?
- It costs us R15m p.a. to maintain the randy one's family?
I work full time and take on occasional extra "piece" jobs to make ends meet and the blerry taxman says I owe him, over and above those hefty monthly deductions to maintain the lifestyle of these folk.
Irks me to no end.
Imbeciles.
Wort
Posted 176 days agoTruth-Speaker
Posted 176 days agosamsam
Posted 176 days agoSabz
Thuka-Thuka
Posted 176 days agoSeanRedmond
SuiGeneris
Posted 176 days agoSelftaught
Posted 176 days agoinkunzi
Posted 176 days agoBootC
I do not know how the Pres' office budget is being allocated, but I still think that the current President and his life style is costing us too much as tax payers. If the former presidents i.e. Mandela, De Klerk, Mbeki & their deputies were in one way or another squandering stste funds, it could have been done scretely. But this one he is a liability to me as a taxpayer.
Now proportionality comes to mind. One can suspect JZ has more budget being allocated for him to entertain his big and still increasing family. South Africa, this is not on!
Ozgood
Posted 176 days agoOTTOOTTO
Posted 176 days agoRealAfricanDemocrat
Posted 176 days agoI think to balance the budget, they must reduce the free flights for the president's spouses and children and also cut wasteful expenditure to upgrade the president's official residences.
Selftaught
Posted 176 days agoI totally agree with you. How can offer the Apartheid government anything at all? Stomach chaining! The man lost the presidential race....Darkies!
amaKK
---
Churning???
A little history lesson...guess who was one of the deputy presidents in 1994...until 1996? Yup, that very one. According to the rule book, all presidents and deputy presidents are covered. Hence, even FdK is entitled to the priviledges.
Saif
Posted 176 days agoooooooooo
"The Presidency is currently experiencing serious budgetary constraints and unfortunately the budget that was allocated to you for travel and subsistence has been exhausted. We are therefore not in the position to fund any further flights until 31 March 2012. This benefit will resume with effect 1 April 2012."
Very ambiguous statement indeed. It can literally mean anything. To me it looks like Thabo Mbeki might be the culprit. His continuous flights into Africa as peace broker ( I might add without any success) is costing the tax payers dearly. If the budget has been exhausted it means there is no money left so I agree with you they must wait for the next budget cycle.
King_Biko
King_Biko
Posted 176 days agoLoggenberg
Posted 176 days agodougodurban
Posted 176 days agoafrocentric
Posted 176 days agoI think u should just shut up,u don't know what u are talking about.
RealAfricanDemocrat
afrocentric
lamelooser
Posted 176 days agobis_k'hallawaya
Posted 176 days agoonlythetruthever
Posted 175 days ago