Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE &
Business LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
Sat May 26 13:54:42 SAST 2012

We've been vindicated: Helen Zille

THABO MOKONE | 02 December, 2011 00:4227 Comments
Helen Zille. File photo. Picture: SIMPHIWE NKWALI

Triumphant DA leader Helen Zille has renewed her party's campaign to have Menzi Simelane removed from his position as national director of public prosecutions following a Supreme Court of Appeal ruling that declared his appointment unlawful.

Zille, who had taken the matter up on appeal after an unsuccessful application in the Pretoria High Court, said that though the judgment had to go to the Constitutional Court for confirmation, keeping Simelane in office was untenable .

"We don't think it's tenable, after a judge has said those things about the national director of public prosecutions, that he can continue to be in that position and take crucial decisions that will then obviously be open to question and challenge," said Zille.

Though Simelane and President Jacob Zuma might appeal the ruling, law experts said their options were limited .

Constitutional law expert Pierre de Vos described the judgment as "very sound in law" and unlikely to be overruled.

"They [the Constitutional Court] might interpret the facts differently but I would be shocked if, on the legal points, they came to a different conclusion."

The ruling could have dramatic consequences, De Vos warned, because, by extension, all decisions taken by Simelane during his tenure were invalid.

Law expert Shadrack Gutto said the ruling created an unprecedented situation - a painful one for Zuma.

"Once the Constitutional Court has made its ruling, the president has to abide by it."

Zille said the Supreme Court of Appeal "has now affirmed our original position. The president, in our view, appointed Simelane because he needed [a national director of public prosecutions who] had proved to be pliant to the wishes of the executive. This was part of the 'Zumafication' of the state institutions designed to shield the president and his network from being held accountable in law".

Zille said the ruling was a blow to moves by Zuma and his inner circle to use state institutions to fight factional battles in the ANC.

The Zuma administration was criticised this week for replacing the head of the Special Investigating Unit, Willie Hofmeyr, with Willem Heath, who formed part of a brains trust that helped the president fight off corruption charges in 2008.

"Now they have removed Willie Hofmeyr . they thought they could rely on Menzi Simelane . "

- Additional reporting by Sapa

To submit comments you must first

Join the discussion & Debate

We've been vindicated: Helen Zille

For Commenters Consideration | Please stick to the subject matter

COMMENTS [27]

BornintheRSA

Posted 176 days ago
Avatar
Putting the persons of Zuma and Simelane aside, that we have people and processes that worked and allowed this matter to be taken to the supreme court should make us be proud and all the more determined to resist ANC attempts to muffle the press and influence the courts - even if the result had been otherwise. Well done to Zille and others who put this one to the test.

I984

Posted 176 days ago
Avatar

The Rebels just blew The Death Star.

ooooooooo

Posted 176 days ago
Avatar
At least our constitutional democracy works notwithstanding Jacob Zuma's attempts to circumvent the law. He avoided criminal law when charged with corruption but he failed when he tried to avoid constitutional law. I am not a DA supporter but hats off to them for stopping the President in his tracks. Let us hope he learn something from this and that he will stop his reckless behaviour.
Avatar

Mnbvcxz0

Posted 176 days ago
I often felt short chnaged by the DA as the official opposition party. They seemed awfully quiet when the ANC was apparently having a carnival undermining the judiciary and the constitution, despite not neccessarily having the exact 2 thirds needed to amend the constitution. I feel the DA is running God speed and will soon overtake the ANC in its own home soil. Tony Leon was ceratainly more vocal as a politician and this kept the Mandela government in check. We need a furious DA.
Avatar

shelatt

Posted 176 days ago
Why are you not a DA supporter? Show me a more intelligent party in SA.

Akihito

Posted 176 days ago
Avatar
Stop cheering. Nothing has changed. One idiot will be replaced by another. Ho hum.

Mnbvcxz0

Posted 176 days ago
Avatar
Will Helen ever be so jubilant over poor people's cause? Never! Even in a country that has 58% of its citizens living below the poverty line, politicians expend themselves on matters that only concern a very few majority. Trust me it does not concern Mrs Earn less than R1000 a month that we have a lawfully appointed national prosecution person. In a country where more than 22 million of 49 million struggle to get into grips with economic dynamics, its suprising that the number one opposition party does not drag the ruling party to the cleaners for the fact that it has failed it's constituency. Here is a wonderful niche market for Zille to capitalise on, the poor destitute millions who Q every five years to reinstate a government very little concerned about improving their lives. Zille get your act together and diffuse the ruling party's power, it's really easy.
Avatar

Rightway

Posted 176 days ago
You said "Will Helen ever be so jubilant over poor people's cause?" One step at a time. One step at a time. Helen and the DA are not government but opposition. The poor people of South Africa can help themselves by getting rid of the ANC curse for good by voting with their heads instead of hearts. The ANC are doing a good enough job of destroying themselves with out the DA. If only the poor would see this and react accordingly.
Avatar

datraveller

Posted 176 days ago
You may think that these wars are misguided or unnecessary but these types of appointments hide corruption the very corruption that denies service delivery and upliftment to the POOR! By using the law to remove these corrupt fools the poor can only win - next elect the DA into power so they can spend their time on fighting poverty and not corruption.
Avatar

TheLooseGoose

Posted 173 days ago
Start by asking yourself why we have 48% below the breadline . Could it possibly be that the masses breed at the price of a paw paw , instead of planning child birth like most thinking saffers - these children grow up , have to be educated and most of all dont ask to be born in the first place .

Start with curbing child grants , until hysterectomy scar is verified .

Rightway

Posted 176 days ago
Avatar
His CV was shoddily prepared and was full of spelling and other errors.

.....


This an obvious political appointment. Just like Mogoe Mogoe of the Constitutional Court. When
will Zuma 783 stop embarrassing himself and South Africa? He might be the result of a popular vote but the world now knows he is an idiot. Therefore his supporters must also be idiots. New York times and other overseas media carried this story. Which is good in a way for our opposition but bad for the image of South Africa,s majority voters who tolerate pathetic leaders.
Avatar

RedCoat

Posted 176 days ago
"He might be the result of a popular vote but the world now knows he is an idiot."

And yet the rest of the world does nothing but ignore this fact, idiocy and human rights issues the world over, are conveniently ignored by the worlds governments in the persuit of their own internal economic growth (ie money and greed).
Avatar

TheLooseGoose

Posted 173 days ago
result of a popular vote but the world now knows he is an idiot. Therefore his supporters must also be idiots.
***********************************
no greater evidence that the quality of any African democracy will be directly proportionate to the literacy of the electorate . I rest my case .

Mnbvcxz0

Posted 176 days ago
Avatar
56% of black people live below the World Bank's poverty line of R540. 2% of the whites are no better off. In a country of extremes despite having a black ruling party with all the power to do the right thing for its black people, things have not changed in 17 years! I would join the DA but they don't have a clear strategy of dealing with poverty and human development. Poor people don't care if you protect state information or not, all they care about are issues that affect them today before sunset.
Avatar

pan

Posted 176 days ago
You will find that many DA policies will not see the light of day because the ANC blocks them, and the press don't report on this.

Ian Ollis, DA MP for Labour, is currently fighting for Domestic workers rights.

The DA has put forward a motion to change land ownership rights from communal to direct ownership as this will rapidly advance black wealth creation.

In other instances, DA policies are adopted, but the ANC takes credit. The DA came up with the Employment Subsidy scheme that the ANC is currently implementing is a recent example of this.

So, in the end, you decry the fact that the DA are doing nothing, when in actual fact they are directly impacting on the improvement of the poors plight, but do not get credit for it.

The mainstream media create the impression they want to create, and quite often not rooted in reality.
Avatar

MisterWendal

Posted 176 days ago
There is not a hell of lot of difference between the ANC and the DA policies regarding poverty and human development. The difference hopefully will be in the implementation. The ANC relies on party-loyal cadre-deployment (irrespective of skills) to drive their policies - a ridiculously flawed policy which fails dismally in results. The DA will no doubt have learnt from this ANC shortcoming, and appoint skilled and experienced candidates in key positions to drive these vital policies.
Avatar

buddi

Posted 176 days ago
@Mnbvcxzo
I think you may be pleasantly surprised at the policies of the DA. Give them a chance to see what they do. You can't really tell me that you are 100% happy with what the anc has done for the poor?
And this fear of so many SAfricans that if the DA comes into power we go back to apartheid and 'white' rule is far fetched. That will never happen.
Avatar

Mnbvcxz0

Posted 176 days ago
Buddi, I have convinced my mind with stats, digging policies, doing international comparisons, reading recent history of SA since 1900s and have done some mathematical calculations and I came to the conclusion that the DA is not to be feared by a black person. Certainly my research points at a party bent on injecting much needed progress. But How do I convince other black people because most will not care read a sentence of my research? Even the educated guys rarely open a book to read on issues affecting their world. Just get into one facebook page of an average black and you'll see how distant our understanding is of what is wrong with the Land. Firstly I need to infuse the culture of learning among black youth and then point their own learning will point the right way. The ANC's power is based on legend and unchallenged myth. Their messiah role is passed carelessly from one generation to the next without unearthing reality. I don't say all of our black people don't read, guys like inkunzi are a testament of how educated a black person can be if his mind is made up.
Avatar

buddi

Posted 176 days ago
@Mnbvcxzo
Thank you - like the way you think.
My biggest disappointment over the last years of democracy is that the party that liberated SAfricans has turned out to be a party who doesn't care for their people. Even the nationalist party looked not only after themselves, but made sure that whites benefited from their governance. And this is what I expected our first so-called democratic government to do - look after the people of SA - particularly the black people. I would have no objection if our tax money went to the previously disadvantaged people of the country because they are the ones that were 'left behind', but I strongly object to the fact that it favours only a minority!
Avatar

shelatt

Posted 176 days ago
You must bear in mind that if the DA were in power they would have an extra 30 BILLION rand each year to help the POOR.....And don't ask me where the 30 BILLION has been going!!!

Mnbvcxz0

Posted 176 days ago
Avatar
The more I look at it, the clearer it become as to where we need to go as a nation. An average white person will read 4 books a month. An average black person will never finish 4 books in a year. An average Muslim will memorise the whole Quran and an average Christian will not remember where the book of Psalms is located in the Bible. An average Jew will read and recite all of the Torah at a very young age. The above also summarises wealth distribution.
Avatar

BokFan

Posted 176 days ago
I am impressed. Very impressed. Actually very very impressed. And not wanting to repeat myself let me say lastly that I AM IMPRESSED.

Thanks for making my day. Have a great weekend.
Avatar

Kapitalissimo

Posted 176 days ago
Mnbvcxz0

for someone who has arrogated to himself the tittle of being the most educated black person it is surprising that you come up with such statements - shame man. you are a serious disgraced to humanity. where did you get all the stats ? what was the size of your sample and where was is it located? what do you mean by 'book'? what are your qualifications Mr Judge of all Humanity?

BokFan,

i have lost words wrt your comment - all i can say have a great weekend
Avatar

buddi

Posted 176 days ago
@Kapitalissimo
The truth hurts doesn't it. If, and just because, Mnbvcxzo is black, doesn't mean that he doesn't recognise the shortcomings of his own people. Believe it or not, there are even white people who don't read!!!!
Avatar

Kapitalissimo

Posted 176 days ago
@Buddi - not sure where you see the truth in that post. anyway let him respond to my questions before we jump to calling 'truth' yada yada yada

if i were to ask you a simple question - what is an 'average white'? i hope to get an answer but will not be dissappointed if i get nothing

shelatt

Posted 176 days ago
Avatar
I am a little fearful....This ruling together with comments made by (corrupt) ANC government that "the courts must not hamper decisions made by government...." could be a precursor to a military controlled state (aka Lybia, Zimbabwe, Syria and the many others around the world). The (corrupt) ANC government has had a rough time lately on the judiciary and their patience is starting to wane. I would not be surprised if there is a call to have a "re-look" the whole Constitution. Watch this space!!!