Zuma says it's OK for parties to invest
President Jacob Zuma has again defended the right of the ANC and its alliance partners to have investment arms that do business with the state.
He was responding to a question from DA parliamentary leader Lindiwe Mazibuko.
She wanted to know if the president would give assurances that the ANC's investment arm, Chancellor House, and similar investment arms owned by labour federation Cosatu and the SACP, would not benefit from the R700- billion infrastructure investment programme.
Zuma said there was no law preventing politically connected individuals or companies from entering into business ventures.
"I still have to see a law that says a company of this nature and of that nature is not allowed to participate in economic activities. I'm not sure that if such companies do participate it can be called corruption.
"If you have a company established, following all the necessary procedures and rules and laws, and through its own presentation it wins the tender, is that corruption? That's a new definition of corruption," he said.
Chancellor House has come under criticism for having a stake in Hitachi, a company that supplies boilers for Eskom's Medupi power station.
Recently, Cosatu was embarrassed when it was revealed that its investment arm Kopano Ke Matla had a stake in a firm that is benefiting from the controversial e-tolling of Gauteng freeways. The labour federation has been a vocal critic of the user-pay principle of financing the investments made on Gauteng freeways.
Zuma said that when it came to participating in business, the constitution did not allow for discrimination on the basis of political affiliation.
"I don't think there are citizens in this country who, because they are members of the DA or whatever, they can't have businesses.
"I don't think there is anything that says such a thing in the constitution. If you aspire to be a businessperson, you create your company; you follow the rules . why should you be punished because you happen to think in a particular way politically? I think that is not constitutional," he said.
Zuma assured MPs that the private sector would be invited to bid for state contracts to help the government complete its infrastructure development programme.
This was after MPs inquired about mixed messages emerging from his administration about private-sector involvement in the infrastructure programme.
Public Enterprises Minister Malusi Gigaba had previously ruled out greater private-sector involvement in the upgrading of roads, ports, railways and other infrastructure.
In February, Brian Molefe, CEO of transport utility Transnet, said he did not envisage the granting of concessions that would allow the private sector to play a role in managing some of South Africa's ports.
This is despite a plea by Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan that private sector involvement in the infrastructure development programme be guaranteed.
Zuma said a conference would be arranged with key members of the private sector to plan how best to get them to help the government in its building programme.
"That question of us dealing with the private sector is uppermost because the government alone cannot deal with infrastructure. We need the investment," he said.







SHARE YOUR OPINION
If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.Gormogon1
Posted 364 days agoZuma and his cronies are certainly those elite, who have no interest in improving the lives of the people who put him and his merry bunch of thieves into power. It is time to vote them out forever.
Maxi
truthwins
They regard God as something that you can use and abuse and utter his name to your own advantage.
The ANC had it's rise ,what's left for it, is only it's fall, which is going to be high and hard.
Mr Zuma must try and take the skins from his eyes so that he can see that the loyalty of the SACP and Cosatu is not what it seems.
Mahen
Posted 364 days agoHow can the party that is running government, has inside info on what government does on a daily basis, invest in the government???? They have an advantage over everybody else
Realist1000
Posted 364 days agoThe problem is when the political parties are involved with STATE TENDERS and awarding themselves the right to do the work.
This is wrong and should not be allowed under the tender rules!
the_original_MommaCyndi
Posted 364 days agocANCerSurvivor
This NDR is a sham. Its about enriching the comrades. Stuff the poor who trusted them to better their lives and put them in power in the first place.
RogueTrooperv2
It's amazing how the ANC can actually stand up in front of learned and educated people in parliament and actually state that they connot see a problem with this. It just goes to show how they don't give a damn about wrong and right (sociopathic behaviour) and the blatant arrogance!!!
donorfatigued
Quite mind-boggling!
Gibraltar
Mangqeshane
Posted 364 days agoUzekamanzi
Posted 364 days agoIn S.A., such processes have been hijacked by political parties of all stripes, largely because of the ludicrously undemocratic way that the parties are alllowed to operate & benefit from the party list system, but also because that is the history with which we are encumbered. Political corruption is a long established, defendable principle in this country, and no politician will willingly give up the power that this bestowes. None of these methods have been made illegal, therefore they are legal!
russell.bennett
Posted 364 days agoThis then is our President's stance on blatant corruption - it's not only allowed, it's encouraged. Why then don't we just scrap all of our so-called "laws", why does the population have to abide by these rules when the ruling party is exempt from them?
Maxi
Even back home DA was found by public protecter in one of tender process. So this is not unique to the ANC.
muk1
Posted 363 days agobuddi
Posted 363 days agoThen maybe that should be changed!
truthwins
buddi
Posted 363 days ago