Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 41533.32
    DOWN -0.67%
    Top 40 : 3412.84
    DOWN -0.89%
    Financial 15 : 11943.21
    DOWN -0.48%
    Industrial 25 : 47183.19
    DOWN -0.99%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.5195
    DOWN -0.29%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.3725
    DOWN -0.66%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.3071
    DOWN -0.18%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0926
    DOWN -0.64%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.2931
    DOWN -0.76%

  • Gold : 1385.4750
    UP 0.84%
    Platinum : 1467.0000
    UP 0.69%
    Silver : 22.6444
    UP 0.87%
    Palladium : 749.5000
    UP 1.28%
    Brent Crude Oil : 102.950
    DOWN -0.92%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Wed May 22 11:42:31 SAST 2013

Zuma says it's OK for parties to invest

CAIPHUS KGOSANA | 23 May, 2012 00:41
President Jacob Zuma responds to opposition questions yesterday about political parties' investment arms Picture: SHELLEY CHRISTIANS

President Jacob Zuma has again defended the right of the ANC and its alliance partners to have investment arms that do business with the state.

He was responding to a question from DA parliamentary leader Lindiwe Mazibuko.

She wanted to know if the president would give assurances that the ANC's investment arm, Chancellor House, and similar investment arms owned by labour federation Cosatu and the SACP, would not benefit from the R700- billion infrastructure investment programme.

Zuma said there was no law preventing politically connected individuals or companies from entering into business ventures.

"I still have to see a law that says a company of this nature and of that nature is not allowed to participate in economic activities. I'm not sure that if such companies do participate it can be called corruption.

"If you have a company established, following all the necessary procedures and rules and laws, and through its own presentation it wins the tender, is that corruption? That's a new definition of corruption," he said.

Chancellor House has come under criticism for having a stake in Hitachi, a company that supplies boilers for Eskom's Medupi power station.

Recently, Cosatu was embarrassed when it was revealed that its investment arm Kopano Ke Matla had a stake in a firm that is benefiting from the controversial e-tolling of Gauteng freeways. The labour federation has been a vocal critic of the user-pay principle of financing the investments made on Gauteng freeways.

Zuma said that when it came to participating in business, the constitution did not allow for discrimination on the basis of political affiliation.

"I don't think there are citizens in this country who, because they are members of the DA or whatever, they can't have businesses.

"I don't think there is anything that says such a thing in the constitution. If you aspire to be a businessperson, you create your company; you follow the rules . why should you be punished because you happen to think in a particular way politically? I think that is not constitutional," he said.

Zuma assured MPs that the private sector would be invited to bid for state contracts to help the government complete its infrastructure development programme.

This was after MPs inquired about mixed messages emerging from his administration about private-sector involvement in the infrastructure programme.

Public Enterprises Minister Malusi Gigaba had previously ruled out greater private-sector involvement in the upgrading of roads, ports, railways and other infrastructure.

In February, Brian Molefe, CEO of transport utility Transnet, said he did not envisage the granting of concessions that would allow the private sector to play a role in managing some of South Africa's ports.

This is despite a plea by Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan that private sector involvement in the infrastructure development programme be guaranteed.

Zuma said a conference would be arranged with key members of the private sector to plan how best to get them to help the government in its building programme.

"That question of us dealing with the private sector is uppermost because the government alone cannot deal with infrastructure. We need the investment," he said.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

Gormogon1

Posted 364 days ago
Avatar
My goodness, the only thing this man and his party are interested in, is protecting their ill-gotten gain, by making policy that only suits them. I recently read an excellent article by MF Murobe entitled “Globalisation and African Renaissance: An ethical reflection”. In it he states, and I quote “…the majority of the poor people…are living under the dictatorship of the new African elite who have no interest in improving people’s lives”.

Zuma and his cronies are certainly those elite, who have no interest in improving the lives of the people who put him and his merry bunch of thieves into power. It is time to vote them out forever.
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 363 days ago
Don't you think by upgrading the infrastructure the lives of the poor will be improved? I think projects involved in these upgrades will create jobs for poor. What do you think?
Avatar

truthwins

Posted 363 days ago
The ANC alliance lives in a very small world indeed, and in that little world of theirs fraud, corruption and Greed is KING.
They regard God as something that you can use and abuse and utter his name to your own advantage.
The ANC had it's rise ,what's left for it, is only it's fall, which is going to be high and hard.
Mr Zuma must try and take the skins from his eyes so that he can see that the loyalty of the SACP and Cosatu is not what it seems.

Mahen

Posted 364 days ago
Avatar
This is corruption at its best Mr Zooooma, we all know that you didnt pass matric but come now, use some of that brains that god gave all of us.

How can the party that is running government, has inside info on what government does on a daily basis, invest in the government???? They have an advantage over everybody else

Realist1000

Posted 364 days ago
Avatar
There is no problem with political parties investing in private enterprises.
The problem is when the political parties are involved with STATE TENDERS and awarding themselves the right to do the work.
This is wrong and should not be allowed under the tender rules!


the_original_MommaCyndi

Posted 364 days ago
Avatar
Do they have any clue about the concept of 'conflict of interest' ?
Avatar

cANCerSurvivor

Posted 364 days ago
No! Our president giving the thumbs up to political parties doing business with the state would be hilarious if it was so obviously sad.

This NDR is a sham. Its about enriching the comrades. Stuff the poor who trusted them to better their lives and put them in power in the first place.
Avatar

RogueTrooperv2

Posted 364 days ago
Nah...that is a concept lost to the ANC...along with accountability and responsibility!!!
It's amazing how the ANC can actually stand up in front of learned and educated people in parliament and actually state that they connot see a problem with this. It just goes to show how they don't give a damn about wrong and right (sociopathic behaviour) and the blatant arrogance!!!
Avatar

donorfatigued

Posted 364 days ago
Zuma's response tells us everything we need to know about his - and the ANC's - total lack of understanding of ethical behaviour and policies.

Quite mind-boggling!
Avatar

Gibraltar

Posted 364 days ago
I think whoever says this is mind boggling is mad and is foaming at the mouth. At this point in time we all(including ANC members) should know that the ANC is corrupt and this can be proven beyond reasonable doubt in any court of law. This we have known for over 14 years. It should not be mind boggling. Saying ts mind boggling is like a Zimbabwean living in Zim who says Mugabe's action or utterances are mind boggling even though we all know that he has been like that all along. By the way, the DA also agrees with the ANC when it comes to this matter at least partly. They do not want all their donors to be named. Why?????????????????????

Mangqeshane

Posted 364 days ago
Avatar
Most debates here are skewed. Because the question that should be asked is How must political parties funding be guided. Right now, all parties agree that this information MUST NOT be made public. To me that is worrying, especially from parties that like to posture themselves as ABOVE BOARD

Uzekamanzi

Posted 364 days ago
Avatar
I don't think that this is different, in principle, from the type of thing that goes on endlessly in the U.S.A. To give a concrete example - in the US, the process whereby Hospitals acquire their inventory is enshrined in law on the pretext that it gives hospitals a way of purchasing pharamaceuticals, together with all the other paraphernalia they need, in the cheapest possible way. They supposedly achieve this by "group purchases" through 3rd party companies that they "control". These processes have been completely hijacked by the big pharmas, for instance with their practises of paying "commissions to these third party companies, and that has been entirely "legalised", despite the transparently obvious corruption inherent in the whole process.

In S.A., such processes have been hijacked by political parties of all stripes, largely because of the ludicrously undemocratic way that the parties are alllowed to operate & benefit from the party list system, but also because that is the history with which we are encumbered. Political corruption is a long established, defendable principle in this country, and no politician will willingly give up the power that this bestowes. None of these methods have been made illegal, therefore they are legal!

russell.bennett

Posted 364 days ago
Avatar
But of course it's illegal, just because it hasn't been specifically made illegal doesn't mean it doesn't stand in direct contravention of a little thing called Conflict of Interest. You can't have a political party sitting on the panel supposedly deciding fairly on the best tender bid for the job when one of the tenders in the pile is from their own company, or any company that they have direct involvement in! It just makes a mockery of the tender process itself, and makes it obvious that this entire process is really just a sham devised to fool the uneducated into thinking that there actually is equal opportunity for all, when in reality there's tons of easy money-making opportunities for the corrupt and inept politically-connected and pretty much none whatsoever for the average "guy on the street".

This then is our President's stance on blatant corruption - it's not only allowed, it's encouraged. Why then don't we just scrap all of our so-called "laws", why does the population have to abide by these rules when the ruling party is exempt from them?
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 363 days ago
I agree with you but the fact is we cannot stop it from happening. Politicians practice this globally. It is just in some countries you cannot tell as they are more experinced and carefull. Did you know that the Iraqi invation was to boost politically connected business people to Republicans? Most of them won business deals in security, oil and and arms deal.
Even back home DA was found by public protecter in one of tender process. So this is not unique to the ANC.

muk1

Posted 363 days ago
Avatar
There may be no law preventing "insider trading" for parties to invest in government projects but tell this showerhead that there are ethics. The guys deciding on the tenders are themselves ANC members or being paid by government, who indirectly is ANC. This is a common problem we have in the country that etical behaviour is being eroded. No wonder the lawyers are making maga bucks; for every ethical and moral issue we need to put it into law.

buddi

Posted 363 days ago
Avatar
Zuma said there was no law preventing politically connected individuals or companies from entering into business ventures.

Then maybe that should be changed!
Avatar

truthwins

Posted 363 days ago
Right!. Seeing that they are forever planning new legislation to suite themselves, they can pass a bill that will exactly prevent parties and government office bearers and cronies to meddle in tender allocations and other matters that directly favours their own kind and discriminate against people outside their corruption circle.

buddi

Posted 363 days ago
Avatar
Why are we surprised? This is the same party who said that they didn't know what the fuss was about with Mdluli!!