Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 41373.29
    DOWN -0.10%
    Top 40 : 3349.89
    DOWN -0.11%
    Financial 15 : 12030.23
    DOWN -0.54%
    Industrial 25 : 47411.51
    UP 0.51%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.4346
    UP 0.37%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.3351
    UP 0.79%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.1388
    UP 2.42%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0920
    UP 0.67%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.2277
    UP 0.73%

  • Gold : 1353.7200
    UP 0.78%
    Platinum : 1450.5000
    UP 1.50%
    Silver : 21.5545
    UP 2.37%
    Palladium : 733.0000
    DOWN -0.14%
    Brent Crude Oil : 104.160
    DOWN -0.44%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Mon May 20 11:35:02 SAST 2013

Blade: destroy 'Spear' painting

AMUKELANI CHAUKE, ANDILE NDLOVU and ROSHAN NEBHRAJANI | 30 May, 2012 00:24
ANC supporters marched yesterday from Zoo Lake to The Goodman Gallery, in Rosebank, Johannesburg, to protest against 'The Spear' portrait Picture: ALON SKUY

The final destination of President Jacob Zuma's controversial The Spear portrait is in question following a call by the SA Communist Party for it to remain in South Africa so that it can be destroyed.

Yesterday, Communist Party general secretary Blade Nzimande said the painting by Brett Murray should be destroyed.

But yesterday, lawyers representing the Goodman Gallery reportedly shunned his call and said the defaced painting, which portrays Zuma with his genitals exposed, will be shipped to the German who bought it for R136000.

Speaking to thousands of supporters in front of the gallery yesterday, Nzimande called on the gallery not to sell the painting.

"We are saying, this insulting drawing of the president, we are saying to the Goodman Gallery, 'Don't sell it, it must not leave this country, it must remain here, it must be destroyed once and for good'.

"If we allow this drawing to go to this German person who has bought it, we are actually making our president the second Sarah Baartman.

"So this thing must not be sold, it is not worth anything, it belongs to the museum of shame in this country," he said.

Nzimande was accompanied by ANC heavyweights, including national executive committee members Ngoako Ramatlhodi, Tony Yengeni and secretary-general Gwede Mantashe, ANC Gauteng secretary David Makhura, and Cosatu leaders Sdumo Dlamini and Zwelinzima Vavi.

Yesterday, thousands of ANC supporters marched to the gallery in protest at the displaying of the painting, which they said violated Zuma's dignity.

After two weeks of public exchanges and an emotional court hearing, City Press editor Ferial Haffajee issued a public apology to Zuma's family, and yesterday removed a picture of the portrait from the newspaper's website.

On Monday night, the gallery apologised for displaying the painting after a meeting with Arts and Culture Minister Paul Mashatile.

Shortly after submitting a memorandum of demands, Mantashe told ANC supporters that the gallery's representative had apologised, and had promised to remove the painting from the website "on the spot".

But the gallery's legal representatives said: "The statements made by the ANC spokesman during the march on the Goodman Gallery do not reflect the proposals made by the Goodman Gallery to the ANC in confidential negotiations which did not result in a settlement."

Mantashe later called off the boycott of City Press.

ANC supporters, many of whom were bused in from other provinces, gathered at Zoo Lake, Johannesburg, from the early hours of yesterday, with some displaying placards that read "Naked or not, Zuma for second term".

There was a heavy police presence prior to the march.

Zuma's son, Duduzane, 28, refused to speak to the media before he was whisked away in a black Mercedes Benz.

Emily Tollo, from Brits, in North West, was adamant that Brett Murray did not deserve forgiveness - even if he "repented".

"We're supporting Zuma because he's like our father, and the country's father. The portrait was inappropriate and [Murray] must get on a ship and go back to Europe, or wherever he's from," she said.

Before the march started, a small crowd of ANC supporters burned posters that had been pasted outside the gallery featuring a rhino painted in a style similar to that of The Spear but with the animal's horn replaced by a penis.

Mmapula Fisha, the Film and Publication Board's COO, said the board's classification committee would end its deliberations on the classification of The Spear. - Additional reporting by Sapa

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

truthwins

Posted 355 days ago
Avatar
It will take more than a blunt Blade to achieve that. The Blade is like Malema, the one day he is prepared to kill FOR his idol, and the next day he wants to kill that same idol. His worshipping of the president only revolves around securing his own future.
Should there be a change of presidents the Blade will in all probability have to vacate his nice cushy job.

ByronSmit

Posted 355 days ago
Avatar
Bra-Beige good point!

In terms of this whole painting debacle, I've come to realise something; no-one I have spoken to about this painting is "against" it. Some don't think its a good painting, some think its crude and disgusting. The general consensus, however, is that it is art (good or bad), makes a point, and not necessarily to everyone's taste. I personally like it.
I see the same vibe from the comments (save for those few individuals who are against it on some moral/ethical/philosophical level). However, it is those few who shout, scream, make a noise, throw threats, and march through the streets. The result? Haffajee makes a formal apology. Artist makes an apology. Gallery takes pictures down. And personally, I haven't spoken to a single person who wanted this outcome. I think we've just let a small group shout loud enough to convince our country they're the majority... Anyone want to march to have those pictures put back up?
Avatar

mzansi-wanda

Posted 355 days ago
@ByronSmit, are those people you spoke too mainly from townships and rural areas? Do they have access to PC's like many bloggers here?

On the converse, the people I have spoken to found the painting offensive. By the way, these are, in the main, educated professionals. I guess you are correct that they are a minority.
Avatar

ByronSmit

Posted 355 days ago
I understand what you're saying. And I agree, people do find it offensive and I believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But the question is whether or not taking all the pictures down, banning the painting, labeling it pornography, destroying the original, or making it illegal constitutes the correct way to deal with the situation, keeping in mind the larger implications?
Avatar

SelloMaripane

Posted 355 days ago
I urge you to visit the Goodman Gallery and sample Brett Murray's work. It is built on plagiarized material hidden under a guise of parody. He twisted not only the portrait but the deep message that goes with the original artists's work. He's been quiet and protected so far and had he offended the Islams with any of his work I doubt it would have made it to the pages of City Press. Find out what happened to the work of an artist deemed blasphemous by Ferial and her cohorts not a while ago from the same gallery.
Avatar

Romy

Posted 354 days ago
@ Sello Maripane. It is not plagiarism. It is acceptable to use another artist's artwork for the sake of parody because the meaning of the original artwork is completely changed. For example, both Salvador Dali and Marcel Duchamp (two great artists of the 20th C) took the painting of the Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci and changed some details on the painting: they added a mustache, beard and hairy hands. It was done in the spirit of "Dadaism", an anti-art art movement that reached its peak in the 1920's. Their intention was to create a parody of a work of art that was revered by the 'establishment', to create something ridiculous which would challenge what was regarded as 'real or acceptable' art by academics and the bourgeoisie. Brett Murray has done much the same thing but for a different reason: he has used original iconic anti-apartheid struggle posters and changed the words to make a completely new artistic statement - a commentary on how the ideals of the iconic struggle heroes who died for freedom and democracy have been trampled on by the ruling elite, and how the old ANC, symbol of the struggle, has become degraded into a political entity synonymous with greed and corruption in the new South Africa. His use of the iconic struggle posters adds tremendous power to what he is saying - we should be listening! It is unfortunate and tragic that Brett Murray's real message has been obfuscated for the sake of political expediency.
Avatar

newshound

Posted 354 days ago
Yes, I do! And at the same time I want to march to get test books delivered to matrics when they NEED IT, not as is currently the case, with the 2 education ministers Nzimande and Motshekgu leading protest marches to art galleries while back home kids only get text books after a URGENT COURT INTERDICT that forces the education dept and minister to deliver books by JUNE!

Disgusting!

BlackPride2

Posted 355 days ago
Avatar
Unfortunately ByronSmit most of us sane people don't really have time to waste on none issues, I mean why should one man's penis b so important that the whole country stand still and defends it when clearly the owner doesn't care about it since he put it inside an HIV+ woman without protection thus endangering 4 women he's married to plus the 1 he impregnated?" A President who potentially spreads AIDS in a country with millions dying of AIDS and now I hear we've ran out of ARV!!!
Avatar

ByronSmit

Posted 355 days ago
I agree it shouldn't be important (some good points your raise there too)! But unfortunately what's done is done and it sets a precedent and THATS what concerns me...
Avatar

Whyetchimp

Posted 354 days ago
BlackPride,

You have lost perspective completely. The point of contestation is not one or two men's penises, but rather it is the sub-text, the inarticulate that some of us find problematic. It is teh negative profilling of black men that we have a problem with. The sub-text speaks louder than you can imagine, and has a historical narrativity. Please read broadly and stop confining yourself to the apparent to the eye. Your anger in what you have raised makes sense, but it is misplaced. You will need another platform to raise that - instead of conflating issues here. Brett' story is completely diffrent from yours, his, is the negation of blackness which has for years shaped the european idea of a black person.
Avatar

Whyetchimp

Posted 354 days ago
It is the grotesque representation of the black body which is at issue here.

Stirrer

Posted 355 days ago
Avatar
Methinks Brett Murray should do a painting of Blade - maybe with a black bag with about R500 000 stuffed in it!
Avatar

SelloMaripane

Posted 355 days ago
If he was original he would do that but alas he plagiarizes artists's work and turn the message into something it was never originally intended for.
Avatar

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 355 days ago
SelloMaripane

Its called 'satire'.
Avatar

Whyetchimp

Posted 354 days ago
how do you define satire, RSA...?

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 355 days ago
Avatar
... and this is the minister of higher education ?!?!

Blunt needs to limber up his lips and read a couple of newspapers sometimes. The picture has already been sold and was sold long before all this nonsense started. It is also pretty difficult to destroy a painting that has already been destroyed.

It is, however, heartening that they have to ship their protesters in now. Apart from the government employees (who will support anything for a day off) they seem to need to trawl the whole country to get moegoes to march these days
Avatar

a_stub_born

Posted 355 days ago
my thoughts exactly........
Avatar

Romy

Posted 354 days ago
In his ignorance of the philosopy of art Blade Nzimande does not realize that the burning of this artwork will add to its progeny. The actual physical painting is not important - that is why the defaced painting still has artistic value - the idea or concept behind the artwork is what gives it meaning, and that cannot be destroyed. It is a pity that this painting came into the public domain anyway. The problem with modern art, especially conceptual artwork, is that much of it is inaccessible and generally misunderstood by the general public.

mzansi-wanda

Posted 355 days ago
Avatar
Mr Nzimande with respect sir, how many poor students are going to be financially excluded from rascist and sexist institutions like Wits and Pretoria University by the end of the year?

Have you started to renovate residents and infracstructure in general, in previously Black institutions of higher learning?

Have you managed to cap fees at previously White institutions in order to make sure that access to institutions is available to all who meet the necessay admission requirements?

How are the plans of building universities in Mpumalanga and Northern Cape going?

Where the monies given to SITAS well spent? If not have you recovered the wasted expenditure?

I too was affronted by the painting but there more burning issues that need addressing than a painting!
Avatar

Wiseguy

Posted 355 days ago
Well said sir, I concur 150%!! There are huge and way way more important things for our senior leaders to be dealing with in this country!!!

On the issue of the furore regarding this painting, I have one last comment to make:
Be very very cautious about allowing politicians (any politician) or political organisation to persuade/pressurize/manipulate the people into giving up our hard faught for freedoms !! In this case freedom of expression that is up for debate, next it may/will be another freedom, then another, then another ect ect ect!!

So be careful about being manipulated (by ANYONE) into sacrificing any of our hard faught for freedoms, that are enshrined in our constitution.....because it is not only us but our children and their children who will surely pay the price !

And to those who think/assume I am anti-ANC, you are wrong btw, I am pro-freedom and pro-people and pro-RSA and yes my above comment does include an individuals right to dignity as enshrined in our constitution !

I think it is high time it became compulsory to teach ALL our children about their rights as enshrined in our constitution in all the schools arcoss our wonderful land !
Avatar

Wiseguy

Posted 355 days ago
Eerr correction I don't concur with this part....."rascist and sexist institutions like Wits and Pretoria University"........you need to provide proof in my opinion before you label anyone, organisation or institution, racist or sexist!! And I have not heard of any such proof!!

But I do agree with the rest of your comment and your sentiment!
Avatar

Whyetchimp

Posted 354 days ago
@wiseman,

stop being silly, not everything lands itself to 'proof'. the discourse of prrof and eveidence as much as they are useful, have serious limitations.
How do you proof for instance, if someone give you a funny look, or a lustful eye? Sometimes we use teh word 'proof' to negate people's rela experiences.

AnotherTaxPayer

Posted 355 days ago
Avatar
Blade won't earn his Noddy badge today.
That painting belongs to it's rightful owner. The deal is done. If he feels so strongly about it he can buy it back from the German owner at probably an inflated price. (worth more with the angry paint on it)
The lesson learned here is that cANCer is more concerned about a painting or a picture than feeding the nation and keeping to their election promises.....

Whyetchimp

Posted 355 days ago
Avatar
The only loser in this whole thing is the media (city press in particular), the goodman gallery and tthose who vehemently supported them.
Good that the ANC did not succumb to the noise of the minority elites.

KarlMarx1

Posted 355 days ago
Avatar
One needs to be really drunk to do what the ANC and its alliance partners were doing yesterday. I know that Blade loves Red wine, Mthembu love his whisky but i am not so sure about Mantashe, mqombothi maybe?

a_stub_born

Posted 355 days ago
Avatar
"Zuma’s genitals a useful distraction from weak South African economy"

"South Africa's Jacob Zuma plays victim over 'genitalia' painting"

These are the headlines from the Globe and Mail from Canada, among others.

But you don't need to be or live overseas to realise the real intention behind this grotesque ANC theatre maneuver for ONE painting.
The whole exhibition "Hail to the Thief" (never more appropriate), uses Soviet era and URSS Communist Party and Russian Imperial symbols to depict the current status of corruption and mismanagement of the ANC and ally parties. The sculpture "Party and the People" says all.
Avatar

AnotherTaxPayer

Posted 355 days ago
I agree, this was one massive maneuver to cover up the real reason why the painting was made and displayed in the Goodman Gallery. Hence all the attention was put on this painting to blind everyone else to the other items on display. Like the cANCer for sale/sold paintings. (also highlighting corruption)
Nice try cANCer to have all your rent-A-crowed protesters break down and destroy the gallery while you divert attention to the one painting.

POST94

Posted 355 days ago
Avatar
With this VICTORY in the bag, now it's time to re-focus on the drive for ECONOMIC FREEDOM IN OUR LIFETIME.

Forward ever, backward never.
Avatar

a_stub_born

Posted 354 days ago
ha ha ha ha......The ANC circus ended claiming "Victory in retreat" and "look how fast is my enemy running behind me"........
They knew they could not win the battle in court, no matter how many Groot Krokodil tears-from-the-heart were shed.........
Avatar

Wiseguy

Posted 354 days ago
@stub born.....LOL!!

@POST94......I don't think any limitations imposed on the peoples right to freedom of expression(within the confines of our constitution) should/could ever be considered a VICTORY! It can only be a step backwards.....as in PRE94, where peoples freedoms were severely limited as we all know !

SeanKeys

Posted 354 days ago
Avatar
Perhaps these loyal supporters should rather ask; WHY IS IT THAT THE REST OF THE WORLD HAS SO LITTLE RESPECT FOR ZUMA??? instead of blindly supporting him. I mean there is a reason. In other countries you would willingly step down from politics if you are found guilty of suspicious relationships (Shaik), not here, he goes from that to all those 100's of related charges to getting rid of the Scorpions and now trying to get rid of freedom of speech. To say these supporters BLINDLY follow Zuma is an understatement!! Zuma should never have been voted president. While he increases the number of wives he has at tax payers expense, there are many in ANC regions that have never seen one election promise and never will

AnthonyHill

Posted 354 days ago
Avatar
In all honesty does anyone still take Blade Nzimade seriously??? With every public comment he makes he loses credibility in my eyes! I think he needs to direct his attention more on the pressing issues that are facing our higher education system, instead of shouting ridiculous and outlandish comments in a bid to gain favor in the eyes of the "ANC hopeful" .

newshound

Posted 354 days ago
Avatar
Interesting: Nzimande, minister of HIGHER education should organise another march which will intimidate the international owner sufficiently to write off his R136 000 and donate the painting to the ANC for Nzimande to destroy it persoally.

Damage to property according to ANC: by all means, Murray's painting and you are a national HERO. Municipal buildings and windows? Hmmm - NO! We send the police to kill you (Andries Tetane.)

HIGHER education minister.....

Whyetchimp

Posted 354 days ago
Avatar
The old is dying, but the new is not yet born. In fact it is nott very promising. The DA's ambivalence with issues of race is not helping south africans out of the lack of imagination of the ANC. We are just going around teh circle. Isnt it interesting that the DA has never uttred a word in condemnation of The Spear?? That is the ambivalence that I am talking about. You cannot be silent on such an emotive and divisive matter. This shows that even if they can come to power, they will not know how to deal with the race question in south africa, which remains a key issue.
Avatar

Romy

Posted 354 days ago
Whyetchimp, I think that is because the DA as a political entity do not have an 'official' position on the Spear. The DA is represented by members who come from diverse race groups, cultures and religions, all whom would probably have a different viewpoint on the Spear. That may come across as ambivalence. I know that both Mmusi Maimane and Dene Smuts have condemned the intimidation of the City Press and the Goodman Gallery, which they view as an assault on the Constitution. It is much like their position on the Palestinian/Israeli conflict - they have condemned the violence and the loss of life on both sides, but they have chosen to remain neutral instead of taking sides out of respect for the diversity of the society we live in. I understand that there are some ANC members who do not agree with the way the issue of the Spear has been handled by the ANC, but their voices have been drowned out. Personally, I don't agree that the DA has been ambivalent about race. They have always said that they stand for a completely non-racial and free society: "Our dream for South Africa is of an open opportunity society in which every person is free, secure and equal, where everyone has the opportunity to improve the quality of his life and pursue her dreams, and in which every language and culture has equal respect and recognition...one nation, one future, living together under the Constitution in peace, security and prosperity, with opportunity and recognition for all the rainbow people...Human dignity is the foundational concept that informs our values and vision".

I hope that dream is still possible. That painting should never have been allowed to become so divisive.