Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 40998.58
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Top 40 : 3361.59
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Financial 15 : 11703.85
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Industrial 25 : 46637.62
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.5763
    UP 0.07%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.4987
    UP 0.23%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.3835
    UP 0.04%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0947
    UP 0.14%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.2551
    UP 0.14%

  • Gold : 1386.6000
    UP 0.03%
    Platinum : 1452.5000
    UP 0.31%
    Silver : 22.4000
    UP 0.16%
    Palladium : 727.0000
    UP 0.55%
    Brent Crude Oil : 102.640
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Sun May 26 07:17:54 SAST 2013

ANC adopts final info bill draft as opposition walks out

Sapa | 27 November, 2012 11:45
'Charlie Chaplin' pickets outside parliament on the first day of the Right2Know campaign's week-long protest against the Protection of State Information Bill. File photo.
Image by: HALDEN KROG / Halden Krog

The ANC majority on Tuesday drove the final draft of the Protection of State Information Bill through the parliamentary committee process, after opposition parties walked out in protest.

A report on the amended bill was adopted by unanimous vote by the ruling party and will now be debated in the National Council of Provinces of Thursday, in one of the last steps before it becomes law.

Opposition parties had welcomed eleventh-hour changes brought by the ANC, but refused to be party to the adoption of the report because they did not have time to study it.

"We were told we would have the report at the weekend, not half-an-hour after the meeting began," Democratic Alliance MP Alf Lees said.

He said it was not proper to read the report in a few minutes to see whether it accurately reflected both amendments agreed to and dissenting minority reviews.

Committee chairman Raseriti Tau lamented the walk-out and pre-emptively rubbished remaining criticism of the bill as grand-standing, given the number of amendments made to it, which he put at 800.

"Surely, after such an elaborate consultation process and thorough amendment to address the challenges and concerns raised about the Info Bill, one would expect general support of the bill," he told a media briefing.

But the Right2Know campaign, which was born in opposition to the bill, said the ruling party had only partially addressed concerns; loopholes remained, and the result was likely to be over-classification.

The ANC's latest changes to the bill were brought last week after the party came under renewed pressure from its ally Cosatu.

It notably went against the wishes of State Security Minister Siyabonga Cwele by proposing to reinsert a clause offering protection for those who reveal classified information to expose a crime.

It also agreed to scrap a clause that would have made the new legislation trump the progressive Promotion of Access to Information Act, which gives citizens the right to access the information necessary to exercise their constitutional rights.

Thirdly, it moved to allow the Public Protector, the Auditor General and all other chapter nine institutions to be in possession of classified information.

Madonsela met with the ANC again last week after warning in March that she could be arrested for routinely receiving leaked documents from whistle-blowers.

The bill has undergone two-and-a-half years of redrafting since it was introduced in 2010, and was slated by some as a throwback to apartheid era state secrecy.

The sustained outcry over the bill saw the ANC make a phased retreat from its most contested provisions, including those imposing minimum prison sentences for releasing secret documents and enabling, literally, 1001 state entities to classify information.

On Tuesday, Tau blamed the controversy on misrepresentation by opponents of the bill, and went on to make the surprising claim that the draft law included a public interest defence.

Such a defence, which would allow reporters and whistle-blowers to argue in court that they had revealed state secrets for the greater public good, has been a rallying cry of civil rights groups and Cosatu.

Cwele memorably said the ANC would never insert such a defence as it would be equal to tearing up the bill.

Tau claimed it was contained in clause 19, which obliges the intelligence minister to grant a request to declassify information if the public interest outweighs the security risks in releasing it.

The Right2Know Campaign said the bill, after last week's changes, finally included "a limited public interest exemption" in that whistle-blowers were protected if they published classified information to expose a crime.

But it did not go far enough, and failed to protect those who sought to alert the public to an imminent health or environmental threat.

Furthermore, Right2Know said, the bill still criminalised mere possession of secret documents, as well as criminalising the publishing of classified information once it was already in the public domain -- as the media had done with Wikileaks exposes.

"This is so blunt an intrusion on the rights to access to information and freedom of expression that it will fail the constitutionality test," it said, reviving the threat of a legal challenge to the bill.

The bill will be debated in the NCOP on Thursday.

After its likely adoption by the council, given the ANC's majority in the chamber, it has to be referred back to the National Assembly for approval after Parliament reopens next year.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

TheGreenie

Posted 179 days ago
Avatar
I find is sad that ▇▇▇▇▇ and that we cannot ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
But hope ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
at least ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ at the end of the day

katrynVBengal

Posted 179 days ago
Avatar
excellent comment Greenie ...and so we return to the darker days yet again. Damn all those countrymen still loyal to ANC

CynthiaMulomba

Posted 179 days ago
Avatar
I'd rather be a damned ANC loyalist than a National Party fossil or a D.A. stooge
Avatar

TheGreenie

Posted 179 days ago
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
Avatar

Duzula

Posted 179 days ago
We are going backwards
Avatar

Johnfpro

Posted 179 days ago
Yep, you stand to make a lot more money....
Avatar

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 179 days ago
Well then 'damned' you will be.
Avatar

l984

Posted 179 days ago
"Duzula
Posted 21 minutes ago
We are going backwards"

Yes, history does tend to repeat itself - but only for those who do not learn from it.
Avatar

staren

Posted 179 days ago
Well hopefully if the ANC gets its act together sometime in the next decade or so, your damnation might not be eternal...
Avatar

RussellWright

Posted 178 days ago
It amounts to the same thing sweetie.

Sasha*-Fierce

Posted 179 days ago
Avatar
The Bill must be thrown out is inconsistent with the Constitution, we demand that Justice be done in terms of section 2 of the Constitution on supremacy of the Constitution.
Clause 2(b) of the Bill clearly conveys the complex balancing act involved when considering the disclosure of potentially sensitive government information. It states that the objects of this Act are to promote transparency and accountability in governance while recognizing that state information may be protected from disclosure in order to safeguard the national security of the Republic.
However, despite Clause 6 expressly acknowledging that access to state information is a basic right which advances human dignity and may even promote safety and security, the balancing act demanded by Clause 2(b) has, to date, come down firmly on the side of protecting national security.
The Promotion of Access to Information Act 2000 (‘PAIA’) is the ‘constitutionally-mandated’ statute which codifies the right to access state information provided for in section 32 of the Constitution.
Section 5 of PAIA is clear that the Act reigns supreme over other statutes which are materially inconsistent with PAIA or otherwise purport to restrict access to state information. As a result of an eleventh hour amendment before the Bill was passed by the National Assembly, Clause 1(4) ensures the Bill now trumps PAIA in the event of a conflict regarding the disclosure of classified information.
As the Preamble to PAIA notes, the system of government in South Africa before 27 April 1994 resulted in a secretive and unresponsive culture in public bodies which often led to an abuse of power and human rights violations. PAIA was enacted to “foster a culture of transparency and accountability in public and private bodies by giving effect to the right of access to information and to actively promote a society in which the people of South Africa have effective access to information to enable them to more fully exercise and protect all of their rights. We are not going to manufacture ''draconian legislation'' to protect crooks!