Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 41199.65
    DOWN -1.52%
    Top 40 : 3386.95
    DOWN -2.13%
    Financial 15 : 11757.71
    DOWN -1.79%
    Industrial 25 : 46822.47
    DOWN -1.25%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.5880
    UP 0.22%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.4525
    UP 0.50%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.3571
    UP 0.58%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0943
    UP 1.67%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.3100
    UP 0.58%

  • Gold : 1391.7400
    UP 1.72%
    Platinum : 1462.5000
    DOWN -0.17%
    Silver : 22.4730
    UP 0.90%
    Palladium : 737.5000
    DOWN -0.47%
    Brent Crude Oil : 101.930
    DOWN -0.65%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Thu May 23 13:27:47 SAST 2013

Xingwana accused of using position in nephews custody battle

Sapa | 08 February, 2013 07:177 Comments
Women, Children and Persons with Disabilities Minister Lulama Xingwana. File picture.
Image by: Martin Rhodes

Minister of Women, Children and People with Disability Lulu Xingwana has been accused of using her position to forcibly remove her nephew's two-year-old daughter from her mother.

The toddler's parents had been entwined in a custody battle.

The Daily Dispatch reported that the mother, who cannot be named to protect the identity of the child, claimed she and other relatives were manhandled by Xingwana's bodyguards.

However, Xingwana, through her spokesman Cornelius Monama this week denied the allegations, according to the report.

“The court found it was in the best interest of the child to be taken to Pretoria by her father where she would continue with her early childhood development,” Monama said in an email.

"The minister was there [in court] to support a relative.

“There is nothing wrong for the minister to be accompanied by her protectors.”

According to the mother, the case was set down to be heard in the Mthatha High Court last Friday . She did not attend after her lawyer reportedly told her he would ask for a postponement.

However, a provisional order was granted that the child be taken to Pretoria immediately and placed into the custody of the father.

The mother was also ordered to give reasons why the order should not be granted before March 1.

The report added that Xingwana's entourage had arrived at the mother's Upper Ngqwarha home in a state vehicle and that the normal procedures for handing over a child during such a dispute involved counselling.

To submit comments you must first

Join the discussion & Debate

Xingwana accused of using position in nephews custody battle

For Commenters Consideration | Please stick to the subject matter

COMMENTS [7]

notyetuhuru

Posted 104 days ago
Avatar
"The minister was there [in court] to intimidate the poor mother not (support a relative.) Anyway wat's new, did Nomvula not hijack a Hospital helicopter to fly her brother to a better medical institution?

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 104 days ago
Avatar
..... but every other child she is supposed to be looking out for is just completely ignored whilst she uses her office and her government resources for family matters!

This is arguably the most ridiculously pathetic of all of our government departments. Other than organising Women's Day parties and overseas shopping trips, it does absolutely nothing except cots us valuable financial resources

Sasha*-Fierce

Posted 104 days ago
Avatar
I am not sure about the authenticity of the anticipated allegations of meddling by the honorable Minister but however If this is true, she must apologies for undue influence or political duress on the justice system and disadvantaging a weaker party to the custody case.

buddi

Posted 104 days ago
Avatar
"The minister was there [in court] to support a relative.
“There is nothing wrong for the minister to be accompanied by her protectors.”

Instead of being in court (with her 'protectors') to support a relative she should be working at solving the rape crisis we have in this country.
Why does every minister have 'protectors' - what are they scared of?
Avatar

skhokho12

Posted 104 days ago
your forefathers while they were in cabinet had body guards, now you don`t know why the current ministers. Even your Zille cannot stop a fool from raping, cannot stop gangsters in Manenberg, you can have all the laws in the country, you will still get people breaking it.

Wiseguy

Posted 104 days ago
Avatar
@Buddi, yet those whose lives are threatened and who are doing sterling work on behalf of the government, the nation and ALL the good people, eg. Dr Siva Pillay or "Mrs M" have NO protection, nor are they offered any??
You see, this current government(with maybe a few very very occasional exceptions) is all about the chiefs......nothing more and nothing less!

The sooner they realise their own short-comings, the sooner we can get back on track to a better life for ALL!

skhokho12

Posted 104 days ago
Avatar
is this article about the minister or a custody battle. Any way, bcoz you are a minister you cannot support your relative, plz someone show me that law. The woman fighting this custody is exactly what is wrong with our society, this guy works & stays in Pretoria, this woman is in a rural village in EC, where will the child get the best schools, health care, upbringing between EC rural village & Pretoria? This woman knows she will lose the maintenance she was getting for this child, all she should be asking the court to do, is to have the child for every school holidays. Let this child go stay with the father for the sake of the child not the gold digger.