Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE &
Business LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
Sat May 26 20:49:12 SAST 2012

Social grant managers paid fat bonuses

CAIPHUS KGOSANA | 07 July, 2011 23:3013 Comments
Cash. File photo.
Image by: Reuben Goldberg

The suspended chief financial officer of the troubled SA Social Security Agency approved more that R500,000 in performance bonuses to senior managers whose performance had not been evaluated.

Twelve senior managers of the social grant dispensing agency received a combined windfall of over R500000 in performance bonuses after chief financial officer Mpho Mofokeng unilaterally approved them. The performances of the managers had not been assessed.

Social Development Minister Bathabile Dlamini, replying to a parliamentary question by DA social development spokesman Patricia Kopane, said an internal investigation of the circumstances of the awarding of the payments had found that they were made irregularly.

"Disciplinary action is being undertaken against the official responsible for this irregular expenditure," said Dlamini.

According to the Department of Social Development, 11 senior managers at the grant dispensing agency received between R43000 and R46000 each in performance bonuses without being evaluated.

Another senior manager was paid a bonus of R38600 in the 2007-2008 financial year. His performance had not been evaluated. The payment was found to have been irregularly authorised by Mofokeng.

The agency's spokesman, Paseka Letsatsi, said disciplinary action against Mofokeng was continuing, but he could not say whether a date had been set for a hearing.

Letsatsi said that the outcome of the disciplinary hearing against Mofokeng would help the agency determine whether it should attempt to recover money from managers who benefited from the irregular payments.

The DA's Kopane slammed the payments, saying they were further proof of lax financial controls at Social Security.

"People are being paid a lot of money without performance appraisals being done.

"If you compare the performance of employees and you check their salaries, we are not getting value for money," she said.

The agency, which pays about R97-billion in social grants to more than 15million people, received a qualified audit after it was found to be R500-million in the red.

In a damning audit, the auditor-general found that the agency was unable to account for money and assets in excess of R300-million.

The agency has also been plagued by fraudulent social grant claims. It has called in the Special Investigations Unit to root out corrupt civil servants who were illegally claiming social grants.

In the past financial year alone, 3797 fraudulent social grant cases were brought before the courts, resulting in 3345 convictions.

According to the agency's annual report, 8383 people found to have fraudulently benefited from social grants were made to sign acknowledgement of debt to the value of R51-million.

The agency was able to end payment of 28000 fraudulent grants, and payments to beneficiaries whose bank accounts had not been active for three months or more.

This saved the agency R312-million a year.

A new CEO, Virginia Petersen, was recently appointed, almost a year after the dismissal of CEO Fezile Makiwane in connection with allegations of tender irregularities amounting to R11-million.

To submit comments you must first

Join the discussion & Debate

Social grant managers paid fat bonuses

For Commenters Consideration | Please stick to the subject matter

COMMENTS [13]

grant99

Posted 323 days ago
Avatar
Sigh... Another day another scam.

GrOaT

Posted 323 days ago
Avatar
something is wrong here, without being evalauated. eijo!

............................................................................

another WasteFULL Expenditure.

muk1

Posted 323 days ago
Avatar
These reports make me sick. How on earth can someone, in a senior position, give out bonuses with being evaluated? Thanks to the DA for highlighting these issues otherwise these incompetant imbeciles will run riot.

deebee

Posted 323 days ago
Avatar
Scum. Trailer park scum. "Disciplinary action" will amount to nothing more than a slap on the wrist and probably 'redeployment' to a better job. Trailer park scum should be fired and all their assets taken away from them including their houses, cars and clothes - they wouldn't need them in prison if justice were indeed served.

Ndlwananhle-kayi-1

Posted 323 days ago
Avatar
Iyo yo yo yo kukhona okungahambi kahle la!!!!

Dodoria-Jinrei

Posted 323 days ago
Avatar
is 45000 considered fat?

Dodoria-Jinrei

Posted 323 days ago
Avatar
i don't understand why my comment was removed?asking whether 40k is considered a fat bonus is wrong?

Rightway

Posted 323 days ago
Avatar
Fire them and put them in jail. Social grants on the scale they are in SA prove that :the ANC and Zuma 783 have failed and should resign. No jobs have been created. Auora,s criminality alone lost thousands of jobs. How many other jobs lost due to AA and BEE and parastatal and municable and ministry failures.

I see the new bright spark AA moderator only allows PC comments on bland and neutral topics. How come no comments on General Field Marshall his Highness Cele(ebe)500M and counting news items. Maybe the ANC do not like comments from honest and truthful citizens who can read between the lines of all the PC and ANC sensative propaganda spewed out by the media.
Avatar

Bart365

Posted 323 days ago
HEAR! HEAR!

CHIRP OF THE DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

rahima

Posted 323 days ago
Avatar
ANCpf deployed cadres are ALL samesame sewage.

VUKUZENZELE

Posted 323 days ago
Avatar
You must see the Fancy 4X4`s and other luxury cars that are parked around on social grant pay out points every end of the month and the young that should still be at school standing in the ques with babies on there backs to collect there "Social Grants" .
Big Fat dressed to the teas and covered in jewelry women under 60 in the ques as well and when they drive off in there fancy cars you immediately notice that there driving skills leave a lot to be desired.
The taxman should have staff at all pay out points to take down details and question these super rich grant collecting individuals.

CB045

Posted 323 days ago
Avatar
This is clearly fraud in the eyes of the tax payer. A salary is paid for the job expected of the employee. If an employee has performed well above expectation and created great savings, a 'reward' of 10% of the annual savings would be in order, but to willy-nilly hand out extra cash to buddies tentamount to stealing. There unemployed people who deserve hand-outs, not these fortunate people who already have well-paid jobs!

Ultimatum

Posted 323 days ago
Avatar
Cant working and deserving people get bonuses.

Please?