Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE &
Business LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
Sat May 26 20:50:31 SAST 2012

Economists warn of tough times ahead

AMUKELANI CHAUKE | 13 July, 2011 23:4313 Comments
Construction workers watch strikers march through Johannesburg. Economists are warning of a global double-dip recession and say unions aren't helping SA lure foreign investment

South Africans have barely recovered from the grim 2008 global recession and economists are advising that the end is not in sight.

In fact, as European countries such as Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain struggle to keep their economies afloat and the US debates elements of legislation to reduce its deficit and raise the debt ceiling by August, local economists are painting a bleak picture of a double-dip recession.

Chris Hart, an economist at Investment Solutions, says slow growth in Europe, Asia and the US in the previous quarter is a sign that the world is heading back into the recession.

"My biggest worry, in that context of a slowdown, is that we are having strikes, and we are likely to struggle in the third quarter," he said.

"If not for the strength of the rand, we would be much worse off."

Lullu Krugel, a senior economist at KPMG, said the economy was dependent on the health of the average consumer because more than 60% of gross domestic product was contributed by spending in sectors such as retail, banking and property.

"The pace of inflation increases has also quickened, with food inflation, increases in fuel prices [although there has been some relief of late] and electricity price increases hitting the pocket of the consumer," she said.

Inflation, combined with job losses and lower pay increases by employers to reduce the number of potential retrenchments, had led to the South African consumer - already deeply indebted - feeling even greater pressure, Krugel said.

Several major companies are consulting unions about restructuring of their businesses that will inevitably lead to job losses.

Loane Sharp, Adcorp's labour market analyst, said big private-sector companies would be worst hit by the retrenchment tide this year, with the government and its parastatals unlikely to shed jobs.

Retail giant Pick n Pay is the first, with plans to retrench 3000 employees.

Announcing the retrenchments last week, operations director Neal Quirk said the decision was motivated by declining profitability and loss of market share.

"We've worked hard at looking at possible alternatives that may reduce the number of full-time people affected and these options will be discussed during our consultation process with the union," he said.

Azar Jammine, a chief economist at Econometrix, said he did not anticipate a major downturn in domestic economic growth over the next 18 months, barring a double- dip recession in the world economy, which could not be ruled out.

The fears come on the back of Adcorp's Employment Index, released on Monday, that showed 127000 permanent jobs and about 5712 temporary jobs were lost last month.

While Japan's growth has been slowed by the tsunami, economists predict that countries like the US and Italy will take a few years to recover from the 2008 recession because of sovereign debt - money owed by their central banks.

Economists say pressure on the South African economy is intensified by:

  • An increase in inflation, caused by exorbitant electricity tariff hikes and petrol price increases, among others;
  • Companies selling off some of their assets to finance debt, which caused the 2008 recession;
  • Over-indebtedness of consumers; and
  • Foreign companies' reluctance to invest in a country where there is political tension and demanding labour unions.

Ronel Oberholzer, a senior economist from IHS Global Insight, said South Africa's recovery from the 2008 recession was hampered by its lack of competitiveness, a result of "increasingly militant and demanding trade union activity".

"When investors are presented with a choice between investing in an economy with rising political and social tension and a labour force that presents significant disruption to the economy and demands double-digit wage increases (even if they are justified) or an economy with weak unions, cheap semi-skilled labour and an environment that is conducive to attracting investment, most investors would pick the latter.

"Unfortunately, there are numerous countries which fall into the latter category, and they are the ones that are experiencing high growth rates since the recession," she said.

Lew Geffen, the chairman of Sotheby's International Realty, said his group had lost 20% in profits in the quarter ending in June.

He said the situation was replicated across the property sector, which was suffering from a soccer World Cup hangover.

"Our economy does not seem to be picking up as much as it should be, and this is also because of the strikes, the National Credit Act and political utterances from certain people - that has caused jitters in the market."

To submit comments you must first

Join the discussion & Debate

Economists warn of tough times ahead

For Commenters Consideration | Please stick to the subject matter

COMMENTS [13]

Rightway

Posted 317 days ago
Avatar
Even without the ANC hot heads, it is hard times ahead. However if they are not, brought under control it will be bad times as well. Time to hibernate tell summer comes. Whenever that will be.

kh'allawaya

Posted 317 days ago
Avatar
.......Sing along

Chorus:

..."Ke sera, seraaa....

..whatever will be, will beee....

..we're into deep s.hit you see...

..ke sera, seraa....

...what will be, will bee.......""

Antoine

Posted 317 days ago
Avatar
"Tough times ahead"?

No kidding!

Given SA's socio-economic fundamentals, a clueless, utterly corrupt gov. (in alliance with wrecking unions), Mad Bob minime's, HOW could we ever go right again?

The rest of the world will pull itself out of its deep difficulties -in whatever way.
But SA will only go one way: down the tubes -badly.

So my advice would be:
-If you have money, get it into non-rand denominations, within a year. (Best is to get most out of SA altogether.)
-If you have job; save, save now you still can. Make yourself indispensable.
-If you have a business, look at unionised labour as you biggest threat -spend big on automatisation, mechanisation, see if you can get (partially) out of SA.

And if you are in no position to hedge; TOUGH! This is SA and it was given to the ANC -to do as they please. At first it seemed all not so bad, but that was yesterday.

One of the first big blows (as opposed to going down more gradually) will be when the US / rest of the world starts to recover and the rand goes into the abyss. If you did not cover for this, you'll SUFFER!
Avatar

bakaebakae

Posted 317 days ago
Antoine

And which currency is safe now? Clearly you don't have a clue of what's happening globally hey?
Avatar

bakaebakae

Posted 317 days ago
No asset is safe....it's true with respect to SA and Globally too...when your European and the state friends default....it will be left to the East and Africa to carry the world forward!
Avatar

Baas_Frik

Posted 317 days ago
The best thing to do right now is to bond all your property to the hilt. When this country collapse as it surely will the banks will have the problems and in my view they deserve it.
Avatar

Antoine

Posted 317 days ago
Dear kakbek, why do you say that I have "no clue"?
Because the good run the rand has had, will end?

But if in doubt, a few loose notes:
-Look at the Australian dollar. (And feel yourself blush in shame for writing such empty-headed invective. YOU, bakaebakae have no clue.

-Or buy American Depository Receipts in Indian rupees -what ever.
-Even the US$ would be a decent bet, after the current debacle has petered out. (The $ may sink a bit, but then in 2012 it will likely rise, the rand WILL fall.)
Or (also next year?) buy German industrial stocks. Germany is doing OK -if not the Euro for now.

There are many options, spread them.
If you largely get out of SA, you stand to win in the medium term.
And in the long term - you CANNOT LOSE.
(Don't forget China will very drastically reduce it's demand on minerals at the end of the decade. And SA is de-industrialising to boot; 1 + 1 = 2)
Avatar

Antoine

Posted 317 days ago
Last free advice for bakaebakae:

The reason the rand is still so strong, is simply because a lot of "hot foreign money" has been parked here. SA has still relatively high interest rates AND it has not to contend with major crises such as in the US and (southern) Europe.

Why is it called "hot" money?

Because it has NOT been invested in industry -long term, but is here short-term only (bonds, easily trade-able stocks)
What does this mean?
That at a VERY short notice it can (and WILL) be pulled out of SA.

And you will understand that this will happen as soon as the US (or Europe to a lesser degree) looks like sorting out its problems.

And I hope that you see that can happen at a very short notice, most precipitously.

You see, it will also dawn on investors from abroad, that SA is no longer the preferred "stepping stone into Africa"; they will also see it for the hopeless investor-unfriendly basket case it is.

Baas_Frik

Posted 317 days ago
Avatar
The ANC will blame apartheid and white people. Just like Roux Schabangu blames racism for his corruption. The joke is getting bigger all the time. Eventually the ANC will have to take responsibility for their inability to run a country.
Avatar

bakaebakae

Posted 317 days ago
So you fit to run the country.....wow....i would love to see your track record!
Avatar

stonearch

Posted 317 days ago
That is real moron logic. Do you have to be a cook to eat?
Avatar

kh'allawaya

Posted 317 days ago
....." i'd love to see your track record.."""

........compared to ANC/Zuma kack record !!!!!!..........

v_3

Posted 316 days ago
Avatar
Surely with unemployment & underemployment at 25% - 70% we have been in recession since 1994 (prior to that, unemployment amongst *voters* was less). All that changes is the severity of the recession.

In a normal democracy the government of the day would have been voted out if unemployment reached double figures.