Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 40998.58
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Top 40 : 3361.59
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Financial 15 : 11703.85
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Industrial 25 : 46637.62
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.5763
    UP 0.07%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.4987
    UP 0.23%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.3835
    UP 0.04%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0947
    UP 0.14%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.2551
    UP 0.14%

  • Gold : 1386.6000
    UP 0.03%
    Platinum : 1452.5000
    UP 0.31%
    Silver : 22.4000
    UP 0.16%
    Palladium : 727.0000
    UP 0.55%
    Brent Crude Oil : 102.640
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Sun May 26 05:43:45 SAST 2013

Mamabolo faces new uphill race

SBU MJIKELISO | 21 June, 2012 00:03
Ludwick Mamabolo crosses the Comrades Marathon finishing line at Kingsmead in Durban yesterday, in a time of 5hrs 31min 5sec.
Image by: ANESH DEBIKY/GALLO IMAGES

Comrades Marathon winner Ludwick Mamabolo claims he is not a dope cheat, but he faces an uphill task of proving his innocence if his B sample test does not exonerate him.

Mamabolo shocked the nation when he tested positive for the banned drug methylhexaneamine, which is commonly found in performance-enhancement supplements and energy drinks.

Ross Tucker, of the Sports Science Institute, said it was extremely rare that an athlete's B sample could test negative after the A sample was positive.

"It is highly unlikely that he would fail one test and pass the next one," Tucker said.

SA Institute for Drugfree Sport CEO Khalid Galant agreed, saying "something like that is virtually unheard of, but not impossible".

Strict World Anti-Doping Agency laws dictate that the athlete is 100% liable for what goes into his or her system. Therefore, Mamabolo could be found guilty even if he was able to prove that the substance got into his system by "accident", Tucker said.

"His first option is to have his B sample tested and hope that it comes back negative," said Tucker. "The second option is that he has to prove that the stimulant got into his system via a contaminant that he was taking innocently and that is very difficult to do.

"Even if it gets into his system by accident, he will still end up being liable for it ... Ignorance is not a defence."

He said the ball was now in Mamabolo's court: "The burden of proof now lies with the athlete, who has to show where the substance came from and that it wasn't his fault. It is not the same as in criminal cases, where the burden of proof is on the prosecutor.

"Mamabolo has said he is innocent, and I'm pretty sure that he didn't take [the drug] on purpose, but that doesn't matter. If found guilty, he is still going to get banned."

In 2010, Springbok rugby stars Chiliboy Ralepelle and Bjorn Basson received three-month bans after testing positive for the same substance despite proving that they had not taken it intentionally.

Wada tested the top 10 finishers at this year's Comrades.

Mamabolo stands to lose his Comrades title and R300000 in prizemoney.

He also faces a ban from the sport of up to two years.

His supplement sponsors 32GI, have, however, denied that their products were responsible for the positive test.

Mark Wolff, a director at 32GI, claimed that it was impossible Mamabolo could have ingested the stimulant from one of their endurance products because eight of the top 10 men finishers ran on the product.

"We do 17 of the Mr Price running team athletes. In fact, at the Comrades, 11 of the 20 gold medallists [men and women] used our product.

"Our products are clean, natural and child-friendly. If the stimulant was in our product you could have had 11 positive drug tests in the Comrades.

"Mamabolo is an intelligent guy and something like this wouldn't have given him a benefit in the ultra-marathon. It was most likely taken accidentally, but you never know with athletes."

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

zindela

Posted 338 days ago
Avatar
Here's hoping that Mr Mamabolo is innocent, as he suggests that he is; in keeping with Zapiro's recent drawing Mr Mamabolo certainly is...was?...a Comrade of which we were proud.

kksonuk

Posted 338 days ago
Avatar
If someone can prove that the liquids handed out to athletes during the race along the road by the well organized well wishers are all tested and certified uncontaminated, then I can run the marathon with confidence and win it. Who knows who went there to wait for me when I pass-by to give me some hydrant? And if my knowledge is not rusted, during the process of running, the body will absorb the liquid faster than when relaxed and it is easy for the drug to come out (in the sample) immediately after the race. Just saying.

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 338 days ago
Avatar
The runners don't take drinks from 'well wishers' along the road and if they do then they are either crazy or stupid. They get their drinks from the hydration stations which are set up, run and monitored by the organisers.

Methylhexaneamine has been causing havoc all through the sporting world. Since they started testing for it two years ago, it has been a huge controversial issue. There is no evidence that it is a performance enhancer to start with. Everything from herbal nasal sprays to muscle rub could result in trace metabolites - and that is what they are testing for.

Chances of his B sample testing differently are about a million to one. It would make my day if it did test differently but I'm afraid he needs to start focusing on the inquest at this stage

Stirrer

Posted 338 days ago
Avatar
How sad - all runners in contention surely know that they will be tested if they win the race. For this reason, I believe Mamabolo wouldn't knowingly have taken any banned substance. Unfortunately, the hard line has to be taken (even if foul play could have taken place!).

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 338 days ago
Avatar
Just read the article about this being a 'racist plot'. From having my sympathy, I now hope he does go to court and get nailed so that the doping control procedure gets protected and this ridiculous slave mentality of being persecuted is outed for being completely baseless.

The laboratory has no idea of who the sample belongs to and the doping control procedures are air tight. Paranoia cannot be allowed to undermine legitimate controls to protect our athletes.
Avatar

Stirrer

Posted 338 days ago
Hi Mommacyndi Yea - in Ludwick's defence, this report (alleging racism) smacks of mischievous journalism. If the journalist wanted an informed opinion, surely the runner should have been quoted, and not his old man. I still doubt if he willingly took the banned substance, but if it is present in his body then he is still guilty regardless of how it was administered. The old timer had no right to bring the ridiculous racism card into the debate - he is harming his son's image rather than enhancing it. Besides, the second placed runner, who will be declared the winner if Ludwick is disqualified, is also black (as far as I can remember!).
Avatar

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 338 days ago
I don't care if it was his granny's uncle's second cousin who said it. The fact of the matter is that it is out there and will find some group of numbnuts who will support it. That simply undermines the whole doping control procedure.

This paranoid, slave mentality is contagious in sectors of SA and our ability to rally behind the flimsiest of conspiracy theories is legendary. Just look at the Caster episode. It went from Cheune being a shylock slimebucket to a 'white western conspiracy plot' overnight
Avatar

Stirrer

Posted 338 days ago
"This paranoid, slave mentality is contagious in sectors of SA and our ability to rally behind the flimsiest of conspiracy theories is legendary."

Truedat!
But there is an equally paranoid, baas mentality around - the one which points fingers at blackie as soon as anything causes discomfort to whitey!
Avatar

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 338 days ago
Very true, old friend.
We spend so much time in our own little paranoid lagers that the real issue becomes irrelevant.

I did doping control for many years. That is why this kind of nonsense really gets to me. To haul out a race card (and it isn't just here, a Czech woman tried it too) is just so completely ridiculous that it is infuriating.
Avatar

Stirrer

Posted 338 days ago
"I did doping control for many years."

Interesting, Mommacyndi.
Is there any way athletes can test themselves before the race for accidental presence of banned substances - or is it a long procedure?
I ask because it seems such a waste for a presumably innocent athlete to run from Maritzburg to Durban, only to find out that you have a banned substance in your system a few weeks later.
Avatar

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 338 days ago
I suppose there is but it is hellish expensive. The laboratory in Bloem is an accredited WADA lab so they could be approached for assistance.

This particular 'drug' is a short acting one and is normally out of the system pretty quickly so going through the lab weeks earlier is unlikely to be of much help. A lab workup would only be feasible for something like suspicion of your creatine being contaminated with steroid metabolites or something of that sort.

Best course of action is to treat everything that goes into your mouth as if you had severe alergies. Check the labels and if there is an ingredient you don't know, don't go near it. That should be for everything from Vicks nasal spray to muscle rub or foot powder.

Unfortunately, they can't tell where the metabolites come from, what quantity there were or why they were. The lab simply determines if a metabolite is present in the sample or not
Avatar

Stirrer

Posted 338 days ago
Thanks for the info, and for keeping it in layman's terms - you whitecoats usually answer queries from us simple folks with jawbreakers from Rocket Science 401!
;)

Gibraltar

Posted 338 days ago
Avatar
Hi family says the results are racists. LOL, being a young black man I find this rediculous. But I can see where they are going with this! Innocent or not, they are hoping the by playing the race card the ANC and the ANCYL will get wind of this and launch their support for the family from the race card platform. I suppose Chilliboy and Zhane should have used the same excuse as well. All winners of the comrades are subjected to tests. Wethere they are white, black or any other colour. Accidental doping is also possible incase they are not aware. The problem is, its like the court of law, it needs to be proven first.

KafreeMoneykey

Posted 338 days ago
Avatar
If I were him I was going to chow the R300k very quickly! Then the courts will rule on my affordability index and I will pay R50 per month for the next 500 years. I hope

To be honest, this man looked like he could still run for the next 200 km. I think he faked to be tired when he threw himself down at the finish line, he sounded so fresh during the interview I knew something was up.

Haai khona, this is raysizeem (Malema tone!). The whyte peeopuol are trying distrooy us!

Mike123

Posted 338 days ago
Avatar
Seemingly everyone in our country is following the example set by the ANC: cheat, steal and lie :(