Mamabolo faces new uphill race
Image by: ANESH DEBIKY/GALLO IMAGES
Comrades Marathon winner Ludwick Mamabolo claims he is not a dope cheat, but he faces an uphill task of proving his innocence if his B sample test does not exonerate him.
Mamabolo shocked the nation when he tested positive for the banned drug methylhexaneamine, which is commonly found in performance-enhancement supplements and energy drinks.
Ross Tucker, of the Sports Science Institute, said it was extremely rare that an athlete's B sample could test negative after the A sample was positive.
"It is highly unlikely that he would fail one test and pass the next one," Tucker said.
SA Institute for Drugfree Sport CEO Khalid Galant agreed, saying "something like that is virtually unheard of, but not impossible".
Strict World Anti-Doping Agency laws dictate that the athlete is 100% liable for what goes into his or her system. Therefore, Mamabolo could be found guilty even if he was able to prove that the substance got into his system by "accident", Tucker said.
"His first option is to have his B sample tested and hope that it comes back negative," said Tucker. "The second option is that he has to prove that the stimulant got into his system via a contaminant that he was taking innocently and that is very difficult to do.
"Even if it gets into his system by accident, he will still end up being liable for it ... Ignorance is not a defence."
He said the ball was now in Mamabolo's court: "The burden of proof now lies with the athlete, who has to show where the substance came from and that it wasn't his fault. It is not the same as in criminal cases, where the burden of proof is on the prosecutor.
"Mamabolo has said he is innocent, and I'm pretty sure that he didn't take [the drug] on purpose, but that doesn't matter. If found guilty, he is still going to get banned."
In 2010, Springbok rugby stars Chiliboy Ralepelle and Bjorn Basson received three-month bans after testing positive for the same substance despite proving that they had not taken it intentionally.
Wada tested the top 10 finishers at this year's Comrades.
Mamabolo stands to lose his Comrades title and R300000 in prizemoney.
He also faces a ban from the sport of up to two years.
His supplement sponsors 32GI, have, however, denied that their products were responsible for the positive test.
Mark Wolff, a director at 32GI, claimed that it was impossible Mamabolo could have ingested the stimulant from one of their endurance products because eight of the top 10 men finishers ran on the product.
"We do 17 of the Mr Price running team athletes. In fact, at the Comrades, 11 of the 20 gold medallists [men and women] used our product.
"Our products are clean, natural and child-friendly. If the stimulant was in our product you could have had 11 positive drug tests in the Comrades.
"Mamabolo is an intelligent guy and something like this wouldn't have given him a benefit in the ultra-marathon. It was most likely taken accidentally, but you never know with athletes."


SHARE YOUR OPINION
If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.zindela
Posted 338 days agokksonuk
Posted 338 days agoRSA.MommaCyndi
Posted 338 days agoMethylhexaneamine has been causing havoc all through the sporting world. Since they started testing for it two years ago, it has been a huge controversial issue. There is no evidence that it is a performance enhancer to start with. Everything from herbal nasal sprays to muscle rub could result in trace metabolites - and that is what they are testing for.
Chances of his B sample testing differently are about a million to one. It would make my day if it did test differently but I'm afraid he needs to start focusing on the inquest at this stage
Stirrer
Posted 338 days agoRSA.MommaCyndi
Posted 338 days agoThe laboratory has no idea of who the sample belongs to and the doping control procedures are air tight. Paranoia cannot be allowed to undermine legitimate controls to protect our athletes.
Stirrer
RSA.MommaCyndi
This paranoid, slave mentality is contagious in sectors of SA and our ability to rally behind the flimsiest of conspiracy theories is legendary. Just look at the Caster episode. It went from Cheune being a shylock slimebucket to a 'white western conspiracy plot' overnight
Stirrer
Truedat!
But there is an equally paranoid, baas mentality around - the one which points fingers at blackie as soon as anything causes discomfort to whitey!
RSA.MommaCyndi
We spend so much time in our own little paranoid lagers that the real issue becomes irrelevant.
I did doping control for many years. That is why this kind of nonsense really gets to me. To haul out a race card (and it isn't just here, a Czech woman tried it too) is just so completely ridiculous that it is infuriating.
Stirrer
Interesting, Mommacyndi.
Is there any way athletes can test themselves before the race for accidental presence of banned substances - or is it a long procedure?
I ask because it seems such a waste for a presumably innocent athlete to run from Maritzburg to Durban, only to find out that you have a banned substance in your system a few weeks later.
RSA.MommaCyndi
This particular 'drug' is a short acting one and is normally out of the system pretty quickly so going through the lab weeks earlier is unlikely to be of much help. A lab workup would only be feasible for something like suspicion of your creatine being contaminated with steroid metabolites or something of that sort.
Best course of action is to treat everything that goes into your mouth as if you had severe alergies. Check the labels and if there is an ingredient you don't know, don't go near it. That should be for everything from Vicks nasal spray to muscle rub or foot powder.
Unfortunately, they can't tell where the metabolites come from, what quantity there were or why they were. The lab simply determines if a metabolite is present in the sample or not
Stirrer
;)
Gibraltar
Posted 338 days agoKafreeMoneykey
Posted 338 days agoTo be honest, this man looked like he could still run for the next 200 km. I think he faked to be tired when he threw himself down at the finish line, he sounded so fresh during the interview I knew something was up.
Haai khona, this is raysizeem (Malema tone!). The whyte peeopuol are trying distrooy us!
Mike123
Posted 338 days ago