Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 40998.58
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Top 40 : 3361.59
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Financial 15 : 11703.85
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Industrial 25 : 46637.62
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.5763
    UP 0.07%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.4987
    UP 0.23%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.3835
    UP 0.04%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0945
    DOWN -0.06%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.2646
    UP 0.22%

  • Gold : 1386.6000
    UP 0.03%
    Platinum : 1452.5000
    UP 0.31%
    Silver : 22.4000
    UP 0.16%
    Palladium : 727.0000
    UP 0.55%
    Brent Crude Oil : 102.640
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Sat May 25 17:07:16 SAST 2013

Smokers in a puff over law

SUSAN NJANJI - Sapa-AFP | 24 June, 2012 22:02
A Marlboro cigarettes pack, a brand of Philip Morris Tobacco, lies next to an empty coffee cup at a cafe in central Sydney. File picture
Image by: DANIEL MUNOZ / REUTERS

Health authorities are working at tightening the anti-smoking laws and are proposing a total ban on outdoor smoking, which would make it illegal to puff away in open spaces such as beaches.

Stadiums, zoos, parks, open-air restaurants and beer gardens would all be affected. At beaches, smoking would be allowed only at least 50m away from the nearest person.

But, before introducing any new law, the health ministry will throw open the door for proposals in public discussions next week.

According to the Tobacco Institute of Southern Africa, there are 7.7million adult smokers in South Africa - 30% down on the number 10 years ago - who last year smoked an estimated 27billion cigarettes.

It is the second time in five years that South Africa has tried to amend its legislation to make it even harder for smokers to indulge in their habit.

Even before the regulations are debated and final decisions made, smokers are fuming, labelling the plans "extreme", "shameless" and an intrusion on people's rights.

"It's a kind of hysteria, a peculiar semi-religious fundamentalist puritanism," said Leon Louw, director of the Free Market Foundation, which is pushing for an open society free of arbitrary regulations.

Louw believes the regulations are a "vicious assault'' on peoples' choices and lifestyles, saying passing the regulations could constitute a breach of freedom and result in job losses.

"The anti-tobacco fanatics ... the nicotine nazis will not stop until there is full prohibition," he said.

In 2007 lawmakers approved a litany of changes that sought to close loopholes in the Tobacco Products Control Act of 1993.

On Wednesday the Supreme Court of Appeal upheld the act's blanket ban on tobacco adverts.

It rejected a suit brought by British American Tobacco SA, which argued that the restrictions infringed on the company's free-speech rights.

Buoyed by the case, anti-smoking lobbyists are rejoicing at the latest stringent proposals.

"It goes the next step towards protecting health and we think it will work practically," said Peter Ucko, director of the National Council Against Smoking.

Pro-smoking lobbyists argue that enforcing such a broad ban would be impossible but Ucko insisted the laws will work.

Since the 2007 regulations "no one smokes in malls anymore", he said.

Hoteliers appear to be unfazed by the pending changes.

"There might be certain discomfort for restaurants and pubs, but for the hotels I don't think there will be an impact from the revenue point of view," said Eddie Khosa, of the Federated Hospitality Association of Southern Africa.

If the changes are adopted, South Africa would be the first African country to go smoke-free.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

ppss

Posted 334 days ago
Avatar
...because a smoker's right to blow smoke in my face and leave a choking atmosphere around them supersedes the right of non-smokers to clean air? Try being forced to stand in line with a smoker or sit in a meeting with smokers. Leon Louw does not recognise the hypocrisy of what he says. Smokers have a right to smoke but to do it where it doesn't interfere with everyone else. Plain. Simple. Easy to understand.

JimiVan_der_Westhuizen

Posted 334 days ago
Avatar
Smoking is a filthy habit. The current laws that prohibits smoking on verandas and indoor areas if not being enforced by authorities. Now with the new laws NO SMOKING anywhere is great. So for you smokers ... your days are numbered.
Avatar

mikethegreatone1963

Posted 333 days ago
Oh Jimi.! Get rid of the cars that cause headaches and pollution in JHB every day.Give us the electric cars.Get rid of those nasty coal power stations.AND ban ALCOHOL that kills 1000's every year.PLEEAASSEEE !!! And just try to get rid of corruption.AND RAPE! I am then willing to give up smoking totally.JUST For YOU! PLS get a Life!!

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 334 days ago
Avatar
Oh brilliant. Some more laws which we have neither the political will nor the resources to monitor or enforce.

The health department cant get the basics right but they feel the need to faff around with social engineering?

Spitfire

Posted 334 days ago
Avatar
The vitriol spewed by ppps and JimiVan_der_Westhuizen is quite repugnant and disgusting. Both seem happy to smugly abuse the rights of those who smoke in the most offensive and gratuitous, self-righteous manner. What is quite wrong with the anti-smoking law is not that it prevents smokers from lighting up just about everywhere, but that it infringes on their right to open restaurants that cater specifically for them. A friend in the restaurant trade applied to open a "smoker's restaurant" - staffed by smokers for smokers - yet was refused a licence. This would allow those who smoke and wish to socialise with other smokers the right to enjoy what non-smokers do - and as an added benefit they would not have to rub shoulders with the likes of ppps and JimiVan_der_Westhuizen! The refusal to allow a "smoker's restaurant" clearly indicates that the law has been constructed in some way to "punish" smokers for an activity that is legal and provides generously to Greedy Pig Gordhan's gravy train budget. All those non-smokers, rubbing their hands in glee at the punishment levied on smokers should enjoy their own short-lived freedom. The goody-two-shoes, nanny state police, are already busy preparing us for alcohol to be banned and for censorship to be re-introduced. In the nanny state, the crocodile eventually comes for all of you.


Avatar

RedCoat

Posted 334 days ago
Agreed,
And add to the fact that when the anti smokers and anti drinkers succeed in banning it all together the tax revenue shortfall will be made up by them as well as the pariahs they persicute now.
Avatar

ppss

Posted 334 days ago
vitriol? I don't think so. In my experience with smokers they are completely inconsiderate of others. I have no problem with smokers puffing in public but it does not give them the right to force me to inhale their clouds of poison. by all means have a smokers-only restaurant but in any other restaurant I don't expect to have my meal ruined by a brainless tosser too weak willed to kick a habit specifically designed to kill them. And by christ don't ever make the mistake of smoking near my wife who suffers from very brittle asthma - the end result there would make lung cancer look like the easy way out.
Avatar

PierreMare

Posted 334 days ago
these same self righteous "spears" are noticably quiet on serious issues, like school books, or the lack thereof, child rape, abuse against women, yet they stick their snotty noses into my smoking in my car, and in free public airspace that I also pay taxes for?????over and above the sin taxes so beloved of every budget speech. I am of the opinion that most smokers do try and be understanding of non smokers and avoid scenes, but idiots who make a mountain over a molehill probably get the backs up of smokers who then give them the proverbial finger and smoke!
Avatar

RedCoat

Posted 334 days ago
So all smokers are 'brainless tossers' now?..............
complete the rest pls.

Drunken.......................
drugged.......................
crippled.......................
female........................
white.........................
black.........................
indian.........................
chinese.......................
Avatar

Spitfire

Posted 333 days ago
ppps - Forget the odd bad mannered passing smoker - it is rather the clouds of pollution that cause lung disease from diesel vehicles according to the latest reports. Do you perhaps drive a diesel car that "puffs deadly smoke" in the face of young children on the roadside? Then there's the deadly emissions from unleaded fuel. ppps - I think you need help to get your priorities right.
Avatar

ppss

Posted 333 days ago
PierreMare & Spitfire - of course you won't be whining when you expect non-smokers to cough up for the healthcare required to treat your heart and lung diseases caused by smoking. The only good thing about your habit is that it will kill you off quicker. SA needs fewer morons like you.