Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 40323.62
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Top 40 : 3360.78
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Financial 15 : 10934.41
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Industrial 25 : 46028.80
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.9769
    UP 0.22%
    ZAR/GBP : 15.6361
    DOWN -0.04%
    ZAR/EUR : 13.3047
    UP 0.07%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.1051
    UP 0.10%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.4864
    DOWN -0.15%

  • Gold : 1380.4200
    DOWN -0.26%
    Platinum : 1430.5000
    UP 0.04%
    Silver : 21.7965
    DOWN -0.26%
    Palladium : 708.5000
    DOWN -0.21%
    Brent Crude Oil : 105.650
    UP 0.17%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Tue Jun 18 08:38:44 SAST 2013

Pilgrims Rest 'shut down'

SIPHO MASOMBUKA | 04 July, 2012 23:56
Pilgrims Rest. File photo.
Image by: ALON SKUY

The quiet town of Pilgrims Rest in Mpumalanga, popular with tourists, is reeling with shock after 17 businesses were ordered to close their doors by month end.

The businesses were issued with eviction notices last Friday by the provincial department of public works, roads and transport, giving business owners 31 days to close shop.

The historic gold mining town dating back to the 1800s was declared a national monument in 1986, with its original architecture largely unchanged. The town is owned and run by the department of public works and business owners lease the properties.

Tourism is the backbone of the small town's economy, providing employment to residents of the local Schoonplaas township.

According to Sharon Paterson, owner of Ponieskrantz Arts and Craft as well as the Pilgrims Pantry shop, business owners in town started receiving eviction notices on Friday.

"My staff is very worried. Everybody in Pilgrims Rest is totally devastated and in shock," she said.

"I can't move my stuff in a month, I have so much stuff with Pilgrim's Rest written on it, how am I going to recoup what I have spent?"

She said she was in an "absolute state" because she had to give notices of termination of employment to her 50 employees.

Paterson has been running the two shops in downtown Pilgrim's Rest for the past 20 years.

She employs a team of workers who manufacture stained glass doors, lamps, chandeliers and hot-glass jewellery.

Department spokesman Dumisa Malamule confirmed that 17 tenants had been issued with eviction notices.

He said the department advertised the leasing of the buildings on tender bulletin in October and the closing date was in November.

"The leases of all business which were on tender had expired. The whole tender process was finalised in June 2012 as the process allowed for a 90-day validity period with an allowance of extension when there is a need," he said.

Paterson said they tendered for the leases in November but said since then they have not heard anything from the department.

She said the department kept postponing the announcement of the winning tenders, leaving them in the dark.

"We were then told that the announcement would be made on June 9, but now we are told to leave in 31 days," she added.

Furious Pilgrims Rest Golf Club Manager Henry van Niekerk said he was shocked when three "aggressive" public works officials rocked up with a four-sentence letter notifying them to vacate the golf course by the end of the month without any explanation.

"I refused to sign the letter and told them that I work for a consortium running the golf course and referred them to the chairman of the committee but one of the officials became more aggressive and said: 'Blow by blow, we are going to blow you away'," Van Niekerk said.

Royal Hotel manager Chris Auty said they have not been affected by the leases fracas, saying it runs the hotel on behalf of the government.

However, Pilgrim's Rest Tourism officer Sherry Goodwin said she believed that the motivation behind the closure of these businesses was to transform the economy of the town to include the previously disadvantaged community.

Goodwin also sits in the local chamber of business.

"[It's] probably a good thing but change is not always accepted happily. I do feel for people that are employed here. I do not know if the new people will bring their own staff or not," she said.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 348 days ago
Avatar
Tenderpreneurial dreams come true ???

There has to be a better, more transparent way to run a town than this
Avatar

runhare-1

Posted 347 days ago
I smell a rat too. Watch as some ANC connected fatcats muscle in and attempt to milk the town for all it's worth. This is sad.
Avatar

Mazomba

Posted 347 days ago
You people smell a rat in everything...If the contract has expired, the owner has every right to claim or re-lease tehir property.
Avatar

RainerJad

Posted 347 days ago
Yes, 'us people' probably smell a rat in everything, probably because everything 'you people' touch turns to s**t... the Midas touch reversed.
Avatar

jsavo

Posted 347 days ago
Maybe the option to renew leases, (we assume the tenents were notified) was not taken seriously by the tenants.
Check out Sunday Times magazine, the English one, had a 4 page article on SA shanties and the growth of white shanties in particular.
Avatar

GayspeakEZine

Posted 346 days ago
The businesses should stand together and bring an application to Court to have the tender process overturned.

jamesnaker

Posted 348 days ago
Avatar
The beginning of the end for Pilgrims rest. Within 12 months the new 'management' will have looted the place and turned it into a squatter camp.
Avatar

MsLee

Posted 348 days ago
Yep - my thoughts exactly ...

BornintheRSA

Posted 348 days ago
Avatar
EE and BEE was never meant that workers would lose their jobs because of some local poloticans' ambitions for the town.

MsLee

Posted 348 days ago
Avatar
And so the 'putsch' against 'minorities' begins ...

NeelsMostert

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
This is truly shocking to think that now these age old buildings would be handed over to some goverment comrade hooligans who will probably run filthy spaza shops, witchdoctors and supposed "beauty salons". They are doing the same thing here that they did to Bloemfontein's Theatre scene, where they now have less than 100 people per year atending their "cultural" theatre shows. Leave them, these comrade shops will also go under....... soon........
Avatar

rahima

Posted 347 days ago
The once-good campsite is deserted. I went in to the office. No one to be seen - hear the TV going in a back office. Just another ANCpf failure.

rahima

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
My grandmother was born there in the 1870s. I was there at beginning June this year.

That was the last time. It has turned into a slum. I don't know why anyone would want to go there. It is already transformed and just a big disappointment.

KoosBronkhorst

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
The department should try and employ someone with sense, innovation and creative abilities. There is obviously no one with these qualities employed at the moment. And that goes for Sherry Goodwin as well. What are you going to try and grab next. our Godgiven talents? Nincompoops!!!!!

BobbyBob

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
It would be naive to think that this is not another corrupt process.

buddi

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
How can anyone with a little sense say that this is probably a good thing?

ppss

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
more friends and cadres being deployed to suck the life out of SA. the aggressive public works employee said it all.

AshneSegal

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
Another disaster in the making! I'm so sick of good things going bad!

ILoveTheTruth

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
To all who complains here about this episode. This is going to happen more and more and is the ANC's way of pleasing it's followers. However, if you want to beat them, then make an effort to share the resources of the land with the local people. You can fight fire with fire, but in these cases it is not going to work. So the people who holds on to their wealth and property for dear life, will eventually lose it, if they don't learn to share now. Call me naive, but it's the only way.
Avatar

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 347 days ago
You may want to read the article.
This land belongs to the state.
Avatar

ILoveTheTruth

Posted 347 days ago
Sure Momma, I'm with you, but my point still stands. Maybe if they did well concerning the community, this would not have happened. So this statement makes sense, "Sherry Goodwin said she believed that the motivation behind the closure of these businesses was to transform the economy of the town to include the previously disadvantaged community." Which to me means, the local community got the crumbs, while others were thriving and keeping the status quo in check.
Avatar

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 347 days ago
The problem is that there is seldom a person who benefits from this kind of thing unless they are politically connected. Why shut down a thriving business which is contributing to job creation? Would it not be better to create MORE businesses instead? Get a market going with much lower rental so they get a hand up on the ladder rather.
Avatar

BobbyBob

Posted 347 days ago
ILoveTheTruth
1 Share the resources of the land. Most businesses are not mining/farming related and are established through entrepreneurship. You mean those must be "given away" ? land distribution seems at the centre of this argument and one has to ask, with what objective? land is not given to the "people", it goes to one or two politicians. Land distribution in Zim was a sham.Politicians benefited, locals ( both black and white ) lost their livelyhood . Where it is given to communities , it is invariably onsold as soon as possible, and the communities again have nothing.

2 The truth is that transformation, through taking away from one to give to another cannot work. If the business is not destroyed, it is onsold and we have to go through transformation all over again. It is a process that will never end. No, we need to do something different , get people to work by creating new opportunities, not by destroying old ones.
Avatar

ILoveTheTruth

Posted 347 days ago
@Momma, I agree with you, maybe they should have tried something else, like sharing in ownership of businesses and creating more business to benefit everyone concerned. I would like to think they tried this approach but failed cause it was met with resistance.

@Bobby, one of the few things where I agree with the ANC is that transformation cannot succeed if people don't want to transform. This is relevant to all ethnic races. In 1994, everyone rejoiced in the rainbow nation, but this seems lost now, as everyone is fighting for their own survival with no regards for the other person or race. As I said above, sharing in ownership and creating new business with everyone involved(including government) is a much better option than to forcefully remove assets from the previously advantaged. This will build a better society in which everyone can thrive and not only a few. But, it depends on everyone to chip in and make sacrifices.
Avatar

BobbyBob

Posted 347 days ago
ILoveTheTruth
This is not about transformation, this is about taking the efforts from one to give to another, simply because of the colour of their skin. It produces nothing, it helps nothing. You are right , this is about survival for everybody. What we need is to grow the economy so all can benefit. That means more people work and earn a living. You dont do that by destroying what works. We must build, not destroy.

After many years of colonialism the far east became independent. Within a very short timeframe, the countries there became the paper tigers with some of the fastest economic growth rates in the world. We on the other hand, after many years of democracy are still talking about "transformation". Our economic growth rate trails much of Africa. Why? Because of our attitude. We talk about transformation, we deprive economically qualified people jobs because of the colour of their skin, absurd labour union constraints, a government riddled with corruption, etc..

We are revelling in our misery...
Avatar

zenithseven

Posted 347 days ago
Well put, that is the reality...yet unless white owned business can be given tax free periods or adjustments/compensations to train and employ more people it aint gonna happen, and then it will just be taken with dire consequences. Unskilled people of any race cannot just step in and do the job of educated and trained people...and until education is addressed it's a downhill slide...ohh did they get their textbooks yet? lol
Avatar

JerryYatriq

Posted 346 days ago
"No need to be a 'varsity' professor
to tell that all that's changed is the colour of the oppressor"

and:

"It ought to be upon reflected
that even Hitler was 'democratically' elected"

No two ways about it: South Africa under the ANC is now a National Socialist Kleptocracy.

The ANC inflated the national un-civil 'Civil Service' to a size exceeding that of the US Federal Government, and while service delivery is diminishing, more and more ANC stooges are employed in positions for which they have no interest in, no aptitude for and usually no qualifications for.

Deployed ANC 'cadres' believe that they are above the law, as, if I am not mistaken, neither central government nor provincial government are entitled to serve 'eviction notices' unless issued by a competent court to all those affected, and only following a proper notice and an opportunity to be heard under the 'audi alterem partem' principle.

In order to understand the way under which BBBEE is implemented, you only have to consider, on the one hand the image of emaciated rural black children in Mpumalanga and on the other the morbidly obese image of one Kulubuse Zuma.

No prize for realising that the starving children do not qualify under BBBEE considerations for reason that their 'Base' is not as adequately 'Broad' as the Zumas and other predatory bottom feeders.
Avatar

DarioFroli

Posted 345 days ago
Why take away from a successful business when we start to think to add to it instead of taking away it is then that we start to strenghten. When we break an entrepreneurs spirit and vision whether he be white or black we have lost a building block this country so badly needs

nsukuangel

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
Good move, these white guys do not want to share, well done government, we need mixed racial business in that very racist place. and indeed change is always difficult...
Avatar

BobbyBob

Posted 347 days ago
This is a general "feeling" described here. The emphasis is on destroying what whites have , nothing else. No thought is given to building new businessess and creating jobs, it is about destroying businesses and black jobs.
Avatar

ILoveTheTruth

Posted 347 days ago
@nsukuangel, The goal here is not to antagonize people from different races, but to find a solution to problems and insecurities that face all of us. If the government really wants to, they can achieve this goal. First, they will need to sweep in front of their own doors, then they must employ people who are trustworthy and morally sound to implement a good plan of transformation. It will not work if they turn people against each other. This is childish, very childish and stupid.

People must also learn to be compassionate and work with each other and stop generalizing on the basis of race. Good and bad exists within everyone.
Avatar

AvocadoPlum

Posted 347 days ago
Perhaps a bit fast on the share commment, lets not forget the concern expressed by one business owner who has 50 staff members who will lose their jobs..? This is an old school attitude and your argument could be turned around, thus holds no weight.
Avatar

lizabold

Posted 346 days ago
Clearly you have never been to pelgrims rest!! most of the workers are black so they will all loose their jobs. It is guys like you that will ensure that this country will never be free of racism. Forget about colour work together. If white should share so should blacks. I believe there are more anti racist whites & blacks than racist white & blacks. Get over it!!! We are all living in the same country we all deserve the same sun to shine on us. PS I have worked for the little I have I do not have to share what i have worked for, but I do!!
Avatar

LeslieMcMaster

Posted 340 days ago
From a black point of view it's simple as you've said. Take the whites businesses and share it with the blacks and if the whites don't want to share, take it in any case!

My question nsukuangel, is your perception one of, I must be shared with at any cost, notwithstanding that the hated white person had to acquire the finances to be able to fund the business and had to actually work very hard at making it work, which in turn provided enough work for a number of workers and their families to earn a living, for some idle and non productive black, who did not contribute one cent toward the upkeep of the business, to now claim a share in that business, as a God given right?
If this be the case, I would then give such a business no chance in hell of succeeding as that same lazy black person will just, as is the case in so many companies, use all the resources from that ill gotten gift until the once profitable business ceases to exist, before moving on to the next hard earned whites business and once again claiming a God given right to that business.
The more there are of your sort, who believe that white owned business are there for sharing, the more chance there exists that this country WILL end up like Zimbabwe and every other slum country in Africa. Get off your backsides and start becoming entrepreneurs, work for your keep and stop wanting something for nothing from hard working whites. Stop calling this madness, change!... its not.!

hannespelser

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
What is democratic about this? This is not democracy but marxism, communism etc, but NOT democracy. Let those who want businesses, put together their own business without pushing others out.
Avatar

nsukuangel

Posted 347 days ago
Chief the people you are defending are just renting those properties, not owning them, meaning let them find alternative accommodation for their businesses and stop whining like house wives...

nsukuangel

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
Guys you are missing 1 thing, the government is not taking anything from those people, as they are only tenants in those buildings, and everyone has a right to chose who to lease in their property, in this case the public works is simple exercising its rights to chose...
Avatar

BornintheRSA

Posted 347 days ago
Unless the government ensures that the new tenants start up businesses, they government can be seen to have taken the peoples' jobs away. It may the public works right to excercise but that does not make it right.
Avatar

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 347 days ago
actually, building owners have very little right to 'chose' who may or may not lease their property. They also normally require a reason for termination of the lease
Avatar

nsukuangel

Posted 347 days ago
@RSA.MommaCyndi

I presume you did not read the article, their lease had expired last year and they did not win the BIDS for new leases, thus they are given notices to vacate the properties. no lease was terminated, learn to read first together with your fellow friends, don't comment with emotions please...
Avatar

Mazomba

Posted 347 days ago
@nsukuangel, I cannot agree with you more. The problem with soemfo these people (minorities) is taht the see ghosts in every corner...
Their call for special treatment is unwarranted.

zenithseven

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
The thing that will be lost is the draw-card of tourism in the town, which is the main revenue spinner and keeps the place going. Yes, some people may see it as a take-over due to non-sharing of wealth etc or just another land grab with suspect motivations.


And if the town and it's new businesses become too africanised - not in a racial sense - they will lose the character of the historic pilgrim frontier landmark it is (the ONLY reason tourists visit it)

The people who have been there for years are custodians of that history and that culture..I bet each shop owner knows all about the history etc and unless the new one's can learn that in a hurry....another ghost town and goodbye tourism and goodbye sustainability.



Mazomba

Posted 347 days ago
Avatar
Well done to the Mpumalanga department of public works. Revamp the whole place and bring in new tenants...We are tired of tip-toing around reactionary minorities...
Avatar

jamesnaker

Posted 347 days ago
Well done indeed! I love it when you flush yourselves down the unemployment toilet.
Avatar

zenithseven

Posted 347 days ago
Mazomba, fair enough I feel your anger...yet I hope for the communities sake the new tenants actually continue to promote the town as a tourist attraction, and give your people jobs. Without that, what is going to sustain the town, spaza shops and supermarkets that most people will not be able to afford? The answer is to create co-ownerships between black and white, without losing sight of the cash-cow that has sustained it for so long -TOURISM! And if the current tenants are not willing to do so, by all means bring in new one's who hopefully understand the business dynamics and partnerships that are needed to drive the town and the unemployed people who live there.
Avatar

Yakballs_465

Posted 346 days ago
Yebo! Viva iland grab, viva itenderpreneurs, viva shebeens, viva usalons, viva spaza shops, Viva icorruption one time!

Phansi employment for locals, phansi economy, phansi tourism, phansi rules...eish
Avatar

JerryYatriq

Posted 346 days ago
'Transformation' has been applied so 'successfully' in places such as the KNP (though not run by Mpumalanga Province).

I used to go there, and take my foreign visitors there up to twenty times a year.

Last time I was there, about twelve years ago, conditions, facilities and service have deteriorated to unacceptable depths. Bed linen and towels were so badly worn to be only suitable to be turned into cleaning rags, and attendants were unfriendly and sullen. Prices, however, have rocketed.

I recently received a report from someone who visited KNP a few months ago and according to him conditions are worse.

You could work out what the likelihood of my foreign visitors visiting either Pilgrim's Rest, under 'transformation' or the KNP.

Had I been thirty years younger I would have indulged the Mazombas of this country by relieving them of my presence, and the taxes I pay. Being a 'senior citizen' I no longer have that luxury.

But I was convinced by the Anti White and Anti Capitalist rhetoric that assumes that if you are White, and an employer, you are automatically considered an exploiter. I thus no longer employ anyone. Nowadays I only employ myself.

So keep it up, dear Mazomba and may be you could also bring in bus loads of tourists who will be prepared to overpay for poor and sullen 'service'.