'Zuma, take secrecy bill to the Concourt'
Image by: HALDEN KROG
Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe will advise President Jacob Zuma to refer the Protection of State Information Bill to the Constitutional Court for certification when it comes before him for enactment.
Speaking to the Parliamentary Press Gallery Association in Cape Town last night, Motlanthe said asking the highest court in the land to pronounce on the constitutionality of the bill before Zuma signed it "was the way to go".
"We would not hesitate to say to the president 'Refer it to the Constitutional Court for certification'," Motlanthe said.
His comments were made as the ANC in parliament showed signs of buckling under the pressure being brought to bear regarding the bill. ANC MPs yesterday said that they had made three crucial amendments to the bill.
The ANC has scrapped a clause that gave municipalities wide-ranging powers to classify information.
The ANC also dumped a clause that sought to criminalise the publication of information related to the functioning of security agencies such as the National Intelligence Agency.
Finally, it deleted a line that would have made the bill trump the Promotion of Access to Information Act. This sub-clause was widely branded as unconstitutional by organisations such as trade union federation Cosatu and NGO Freedom Under Law.
In a presentation to the multi-party ad hoc committee processing the bill in the National Council of Provinces, ANC MP Sam Mazosiwe described the proposed amendments as a "major leap forward".
"We are tabling an amendment that excludes municipalities [from classifying] documents.
"We are saying that this is a major leap forward [compared] to what we originally had. We believe [in taking] into account the views of the public and also the views of the committee in so far as making sure that our democracy prevails in all of our activities," said Mazosiwe.
But civil society group Right2Know was not satisfied with the proposed concessions, saying they were an inadequate response to fears that the bill was designed to prevent the media exposing corruption in the government.
Mazosiwe said the ANC had also decided to scrap the contentious section 49 of the bill, which sought to prohibit any disclosure or publication of matters relating to the National Intelligence Agency or other state security agencies.
Section 49 was criticised as an attempt to hide the activities of the state security apparatus.
"We are proposing that this proposal be deleted completely in the bill," Mazosiwe said.
But Alison Tilley, of Right2Know, said that though the deletion of section 49 was a "significant gain in terms of transparency" she was worried that the ANC was still not prepared to act on the calls for the inclusion of a public interest defence in the bill.
Opposition MPs said the proposed amendments were "a step in the right direction".
The amendments were agreed to in closed discussions between the ANC and a small group of MPs from the DA, COPE and the IFP.
The bill was passed by the National Assembly in November. Almost all the opposition MPs voted against the bill and a smattering of ANC MPs abstained.
The National Council of Provinces' ad hoc committee has until September 30 to report back to parliament before the bill can be finalised.


SHARE YOUR OPINION
If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.SuiGeneris
Posted 262 days agoShouldn't the government be open and transparent about all matters that concerns the general public ?
Duzula
Posted 262 days agoZENETH
Posted 262 days agoSo if it reaches the Presidency before mid December 2012, President Zuma will take it to the ConCourt. But if it's after December 2012, your guess is as good as mine.
mugabe1652
Posted 262 days agoGormogon1
MicaParis
Do not you think that ''everything must be bare'' in terms of the spirit and purport of the constitution on transparency?
A media being ''controlled a little bit'' as you alleged will mean cowardice on part of the Government, especially if there is nothing to hide for real.
We have an obligation to respect the freedom of expression and speech as enshrined, in terms of the constitutional means and such respect should also be directed to internationally acclaimed institutions such as the Transparency International who are vocal on pure fundamental rights and corruption issues among others.
mugabe1652
You must be really stupid to ask me that question. Don't you see that i am sharing my views here? Dictating to the son of the soil is just silly of you ma.
mugabe1652
If the media were fair and accurate on their reporting then we wouldn't have to want them to be control but as long as they still have their evil agenda against africa then they will be control. Why the British want to arrest Asenge?
QPCLCD308
mugabe1652
Teleb!ch deserve everything that come his way besauce of his stupidity.
MicaParis
Posted 262 days agoPolitical wish and instructions does not surpass the wrath of the law as such the law will prevail through constitutional supremacy in terms of section 2 of the constitution.
I complained about the privacy and transparency issues in support of the freedom of expression and speech, against the Bill from its originality whilst it was still a green paper.
The Bill is absolutely ''strange unnecessary phenomenal legal initiative''.
If that Bill have to pass the constitutionality test of validity, than the constitution will have to be amended or at list be ignored, thereby rendering the constitutional validity absurd.
QPCLCD308
QPCLCD308
Posted 262 days agomugabe1652
mzansi-wanda
Posted 262 days agoHowever, the need for this Bill for protection of the state against foreign espionage cannot be gainsaid.
Editor kindly invite legal fundis to write on these issues. Your writting exposes your lack of depth in the subject matter and equally exhibits a bias. The least our people deserve is to be informed sufficiently on the matter to formulate their views.
i_stub_born
Posted 262 days agoWiseguy
Posted 262 days agoANYONE??????
WhatTheHack
i_stub_born
mugabe1652
Listen here my boy i am the son of the soil finish and klaar and you are what you were born to be, don't blame me if it was my choice i won't allow breath on your soul.
i_stub_born
mugabe1652
Whats your blood issue?
i_stub_born
QPCLCD308
mugabe1652
Posted 262 days ago..
PEOPLE THE FUTURE PRESIDENT IS TALKING YOU MUST LISTEN TO HIM NOW.
Wiseguy
You see the militant shoutings and screams that eminated from the YL under Malema's watch led to another huge and ongoing "brain drain"(of ALL creeds and colours) on this country and hence resulted in a shrinking tax base. So the result of his actions and words are one of the MAIN reasons, we the people are worse off !!
Less money.....less brains to help........NOW you must say thank you to Malema and his YL colleagues under his watch for this amazing job!! NOT!!!!!!!
i_stub_born
"MALEMA ARRIVED IN A MERCEDES-BENZ VIANO dressed in a white shirt, black pants and his trademark beret."
It is owned by President Jacob Zuma's nephew Khulubuse Zuma and former president Nelson Mandela's grandson, Zondwa Mandela. (notoriously whites)........HA HA HA HA HA HA......
mugabe1652
Bla bla bla with no evidence of your allegations toward future president.
What actions are you referring to? Point it out so that we have proof here, please don't provide me with hearsay from media who has their evil agenda.
i_stub_born
mugabe1652
Put people like you in their own place.
i_stub_born