Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 40572.94
    DOWN -1.05%
    Top 40 : 3370.42
    DOWN -0.98%
    Financial 15 : 11023.82
    DOWN -1.95%
    Industrial 25 : 46667.20
    DOWN -0.74%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.9483
    DOWN -0.52%
    ZAR/GBP : 15.5766
    DOWN -0.35%
    ZAR/EUR : 13.3224
    DOWN -0.49%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.1046
    DOWN -0.08%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.4604
    DOWN -0.30%

  • Gold : 1374.3200
    UP 0.45%
    Platinum : 1436.0000
    DOWN -0.21%
    Silver : 21.7980
    UP 0.61%
    Palladium : 706.0000
    DOWN -0.14%
    Brent Crude Oil : 106.400
    UP 0.36%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Wed Jun 19 16:19:32 SAST 2013

'We'll give them a new Marikana'

GRAEME HOSKEN and AMUKELANI CHAUKE | 03 October, 2012 00:3820 Comments
Nkaneng residents dig a grave during a site inspection by the Marikana commission of inquiry yesterday Picture: LAUREN MULLIGAN

Nearly 13000 striking miners - facing eviction from their hostels - have promised a wave of unprecedented violence at Goldfields' KDC West mine in Carletonville. The miners have been on strike for three weeks.

The mine has been granted a court order to dismiss the miners, and is seeking a court order to evict them.

About 5500 angry KDC miners armed themselves with spears, knobkerries and axes, and had a tense stand-off with the mine's in-house security, who had arrested eight of the striking miners' leaders yesterday.

As word of the arrests spread, miners called for the removal of mine management.

With security personnel threatening to open fire on them, workers took to Mphahlele hill outside the mine, establishing their own "Marikana".

With anger rising, miners turned on one of their own, accusing him of spying for Gold Fields. After beating the man, several miners were ready to hack him to death but various leaders formed a protective barricade around him.

A representative for the workers, Professor Gcuma, said: "This will not end because management says it must. It will end when we get what we want - a fair living wage."

Striker Simphiwe Myaleni said: "We do not want to fight, but we are left with no choice. We gathered peacefully at the mine and were threatened. They have chased us from the hostels, but we will not run any more. We are not afraid. If they come for us, we are ready. We have our hill and if they want another Marikana we will give it to them," he said.

Myaleni said they were not interested in the Marikana commission of inquiry.

"It cannot feed us. It cannot bring back those who died. It will not punish those who caused all of this or give us good jobs to feed our families."

Gold Fields spokesman Sven Lunsche said the arrests were made on mine property.

"Since the beginning of the strike we have been gathering evidence against these men. We handed the evidence, including video footage, to a public prosecutor, who agreed to the arrests."

Lunsche said miners had until midday to vacate the hostels.

"As with all other orders they ignored this order. We are in the process of getting an eviction order because the hostels are being used to plan and carry out violence."

Police spokesman Colonel Lungelo Dlamini said eight people had been arrested yesterday.

"They will appear in court on charges of public violence, intimidation and inciting violence. We have deployed extra manpower to the area and are rolling out security plans to deal with such incidents," he said.

Retired judge Ian Farlam, heading the commission of inquiry into the Marikana massacre, yesterday visited the mine's hostels near the Wonderkop stadium and the Nkaneng informal settlement, where a police raid took place.

To submit comments you must first

Join the discussion & Debate

'We'll give them a new Marikana'

For Commenters Consideration | Please stick to the subject matter

COMMENTS [20]

SuiGeneris

Posted 259 days ago
Avatar
''''We'll give them a new Marikana'''''

AND

'''''About 5500 angry KDC miners armed themselves with spears, knobkerries and axes''''

Note the arrogance and an open invitation for the police to retaliate !

Everything in life revolves around ATTITUDE !

Is this the correct way to negotiate a settlement ?

To arm themselves and invite retaliation ?

And when the police fire at them because they've killed some of those who are just too happy to have a job and doesn't want to join the strike, then they cry foul.

rahima

Posted 259 days ago
Avatar
Draw the line in the sand and call for the Marikana cops to come and sort out this rabble. Every body makes space for a willing unemployed to earn something.

paulth82

Posted 259 days ago
Avatar
SuiGeneris did you read this part in the article "We do not want to fight, but we are left with no choice. We gathered peacefully at the mine and were threatened. They have chased us from the hostels."
Avatar

cj715

Posted 259 days ago
these people have been dismissed from the employ of the mine, they have to vacate the hostels to make way for people who want to work.....

our jobs are being threatened by these unprotected strikes....
Avatar

SuiGeneris

Posted 259 days ago
If negotiations fail with the employer, then they still have the CIVILIZED option to go to a court of law and settle the matter.
Avatar

paulth82

Posted 259 days ago
"these people" ?

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 259 days ago
Avatar
'We'll give them a new Marikana'

.... because the first one worked out so well?

Some days it is very difficult to find a damn to give. I empathise with their desire for better salaries (we'd all like the belt to loosen slightly) but this is just getting ridiculous now

paulth82

Posted 259 days ago
Avatar
Anyway the issue is not that simple. Firstly these mining companies make billions and pay these workers peanuts. Sure if you look at this whole problem from a pure capitalist mind set their demands are not sustainable. A company cannot afford a jump in labour cost at such a short space of time it will not survive especially since it will influence the whole salary cost structure even for higher levels. Which will eat into the profits, which will in turn affect shareholder value or return on investments and investors (the real capitalists) will not stand for that. Which will result in the company being unsustainable because it will not achieve its biggest strategic objective which is making money for the shareholder. Which will result in closure for the company which will result in the mine workers getting nothing let alone an increase in the wages and better living conditions. So they will be cutting their proverbial noses to spite their proverbial faces.

Looking at it from a humanitarian point of view "these people" have been getting meager salaries for many years living in squalid conditions because the mining companies were busy maximising their margins. If these companies had done the responsible thing all along they would not be sitting with this huge problem now that they have to fix at such a short space of time. They would have increased the wages gradually over the years they would not be under the gun now to sort things out. They should have provided gradually for costs of improvements in the living conditions of the miners. And by the way the sooner they get used to paying people what they deserve for their hard work the better. The "good old days are gone" no more cheap labour that horse has bolted. You can't even find cheap labour in China and India anymore because their standards of living are improving rightfully so they deserve it. This is where the wrongs of the past are being corrected.

And cj715 you are not the only whose job is being threatened by this whole situation "these people's" livelihoods are also under threat.
Avatar

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 259 days ago
Let me ask you a question.
If Lonmin has an operating profit or US$160 million and they have 28 thousand employees, how much of an increase should they be giving their employees and what amount should they be giving their shareholders?
Avatar

paulth82

Posted 259 days ago
Are you able to split the 28K employees according to the salary levels within the company? Where do you even get the operating profit of USD160m because the current interim reported proft is only USD14m. What type of question is this? What is your point? Are you having a laugh?
Avatar

ccfourie01

Posted 259 days ago
I thought that infrsatructure was supposed to be provided by local government? Squalid conditions are a symptom of LOCAL GOVERNMENT failure.

As for "cheap labour", you're right. However, SA has expensive labour, expecially when you take productivity into account.

Do yourself a favour and read Ford’s Asia Pacific and Africa president Joe Hinrichs latest comments. He makes it blatantly clear that we need to operate in a globally competitive context and this sort of behaviour will not help generate investment. It will increase unemployment and this will ultimately incfrease the amount of poor and unemployed.
Avatar

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 259 days ago
paulth82

No. It is a genuine question. Show me the math as to what you think the average miner should get as an increase and what the shareholders should get

Lonmin is a listed company - I used their 2011 on line audited accounts
Avatar

PaulThabane

Posted 258 days ago
Although it is a genuine question it must at least be as close to reality as possible you cannot just pull this out of the air and as far as Lonmin being an Audited company the latest figures are used to make strategic decisions that affect the future of the company last year's operating profit is not going to be affected by this its already in retained earnings and even then it was never USD160m it was USD134m so I need facts in order to even imagine what your point is.
Avatar

PaulThabane

Posted 258 days ago
ccfourie01 which global company can you currently use as a benchmark for competitiveness? You cannot be using european companies or chinese or japanese or the US because they are in the brown stuff as well. I do not need to read someone's opinions about what is going on I have my own mind to look at the situation I think you need to start doing that you know using your own mind.
Avatar

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 258 days ago
As an accountant and an investor, you'd go on un-audited accounts?
Sorry, I was using a figure from memory and could very well have made an error, The fact remains though that an average of R8,000 per employee would have meant that Lonmin would come up over a billion rand short on the salary bill for the year - that is assuming that our exchange rate and the world economy remain similar to what they are.

We have the option to go the 'modern' route. The government and the labour unions have been encouraging the mining industries not to go for mechanisation but the workers seem to be pushing in that direction. If we do go the mechanised route, the miners will get far better salaries but they will need tertiary education and there will be far, far fewer of them,

JerryYatriq

Posted 259 days ago
Avatar
Let's try some basic arithmetic: Interim profit approx 14 mill US $ approx equal 112 mill ZAR.

Assuming "Socialist Economics" and divide the complete amount between 28 k strikers (workers?) that mounts to approx 4000 ZAR each, once off!

Next month there is no profit left and no guarantee of even making the current wages.

Will there be money left for operating costs, safety, or further devlopement to ensure
future operations?


As soon as you achieved that, there is no payment for shareholders and what about the taxman's share?

Would you invest even one rand under those conditions?

As a senior citizen who previously ran larger and then smaller businesses, often with the sole reward of simply providing employment to the uncooperative ungrateful I have long ago been convinced by Socialist Trade Unionist propaganda that always assumes that the employer is an exploiter.

I have given up "exploiting" altogether and now refuse to "exploit" and only employ myself.

Go create your own employment and figure out when you won the "Class Struggle" and defeated all employers, which ones of your unproductive and unemployed comrades you could tax or plunder to provide you with a living.
Avatar

JeffMarett

Posted 259 days ago
Well said!!
Avatar

PaulThabane

Posted 258 days ago
You know numbers and percentages make us feel comfortable with what we assume to be the actual fact they help us feel in control of things. You are assuming quite a lot here. I am a CA for over 10 years I did my articles as an investment analyst with Deutche bank. I have a havard MBA and I have am running a very successful engineering company and financial consulting business amongs others. I also have a sizeable number of rental properties which are also doing ok. I am also a shareholder mind you in big SA and international companies also greatly invested in platinum shares which means I can afford to express my opinion on this matter. So lets not even try that route. Your calcs above have a lot of assumptions I mean you are assuming the 28k emps are all at the same salary levels. You are assuming that there will not be an increase in the price of platinum in the world as a result of interruptions in the supply of platinum which also has an impact in the revenue (Price increase not volume increase). I know there is a substitute which is paladium but I mean that still has a long way to go before it can cover platinum needs. You are assuming that the investors have a lot of investment options elsewhere. And ultimately you are missing my point completely all of you I did say that either way whether either solution is sustainable or not the workers need to be compensated for the hard labour.These numbers that you are throwing at me would not be possible if these workers did not extract the platinum from underground will the company's exectutives leave their airconditioned offices and take of their ties and their expensive suites and go underground and do the work? NO!
Avatar

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 258 days ago
JerryYatriq

I'm afraid that the concept of 'swings and roundabouts' along with the concept of 'risk' isn't understood too well in SA. There seems to be this impression that the CEO plays golf all day with not a care in the world and that turnover is equal to profit.
Avatar

rahima

Posted 258 days ago
hey Jerry

You said it exactly right. Why can the sheeple not see it?