Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 41815.36
    UP 1.79%
    Top 40 : 3443.42
    UP 3.06%
    Financial 15 : 12000.90
    UP 1.42%
    Industrial 25 : 47656.81
    UP 1.47%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.5529
    UP 1.29%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.4765
    UP 0.54%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.3242
    UP 1.30%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0932
    UP 0.85%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.3679
    UP 1.15%

  • Gold : 1375.3365
    DOWN -1.26%
    Platinum : 1460.5000
    DOWN -1.65%
    Silver : 22.3940
    DOWN -1.98%
    Palladium : 746.0000
    UP 0.40%
    Brent Crude Oil : 103.880
    DOWN -0.88%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Tue May 21 21:12:14 SAST 2013

World Cup hangover persists

SCHALK MOUTON | 18 January, 2013 00:26
SOCCER CITY AFCON PREPARATIONS; GAUTENG; SOUTH AFRICA
Workers prepare for the opening ceremony of the Africa Cup of Nations at Soccer City in Soweto. The tournament opens tomorrow Picture: DANIEL BORN
Image by: DANIEL BORN

As a "wide-ranging" investigation into bid-rigging and price-fixing at 2010 Soccer World Cup stadiums continues, smaller host cities are spiralling into financial distress, bordering on bankruptcy.

Soccer City in Soweto is the only venue that has not drawn a "subsidy" from its host municipality. All the other newly built stadiums have become a financial burden from which South Africa might never recover - as warned when the country won the right to host the international soccer tournament.

"If you build a stadium, you are never going to get your money back," said Barry Pollen, director of Stadium Management SA, who has worked as a freelance consultant for stadium operations globally.

"If you borrow R3-billion to build a stadium at 10% interest, the stadium has to make R300-million a year just to pay the interest."

Municipalities - which effectively became "owners" of the stadiums after the soccer tournament - have been forced to cover the shortfall for losses incurred by stadiums and World Cup-related costs.

In turn, they have been driven into dire circumstances and desperate measures:

The Mbombela municipality is struggling to repay a R200-million loan from the Development Bank taken to cover World Cup costs;

The Polokwane municipality is still waiting for a R200-million payout from the Limpopo government to cover its World Cup costs;

Cape Town and Durban continue to struggle to draw events. The future of Cape Town Stadium, whose R82000-a-seat construction cost makes it one of the most expensive stadiums in the world, is currently being debated. Cosatu has called for it to be turned into low-cost housing; and

Durban (R72000 a seat) came in for heavy criticism this week for having sold only a quarter of the seats allocated for the Afcon tournament, which starts tomorrow. The city has spent vast amounts to secure events. It is estimated it paid R37-million for the privilege of hosting the Top Gear car show in June.

Trudi Makhaya, spokeswoman for the Competition Commission, yesterday confirmed a wide-ranging investigation into the construction companies that built the World Cup stadiums. There had not been any findings yet.

The investigation into 65 bid-rigging cases, involving more than 70 projects with an estimated value of R29-billion, started in 2009 - even before most of the stadiums had been completed.

Makhaya refrained from naming companies, but Group Five has reportedly applied for corporate leniency and has allegedly implicated others.

"In the original bid documents the total cost to build all the new World Cup stadiums was R1.6-billion," said Pollen. "It went up to more than R20-billion."

According to Jo Koster, DA whip in Mbombela, the city has "dire" cash-flow problems because of the World Cup.

The municipality took a R200-million loan from the Development Bank with annual instalments of R26-million for the next decade.

"[The municipality] went to Absa three months ago to get a loan of R50-million, but that was not allocated in full because the bank realised part of the loan was to cover the repayment of the Development Bank loan," Koster said.

The Mbombela Stadium cost R1-billion to build, she said. It is running at a loss of about R10-million. While it has an operational budget of some R12-million, Mbombela generates income only of between R2-million and R3-million.

In Polokwane, the council paid more than R64-million for the maintenance of the Peter Mokaba Stadium between 2010 and 2012.

The municipality has paid out a further R6.4-million for maintenance since March last year. Over the same period, the stadium made R2.3-million.

The city pays soccer clubs Kaizer Chiefs, Black Leopards and Supersport United R10-million to use the venue for games.

"Even before [the Peter Mokaba Stadium] was built,we recommended that they didn't build it here," said the DA's Frank Haas.

Simon Mokoatedi, spokesman for the city, had not responded to questions by yesterday.

In Port Elizabeth, there is optimism that the stadium might break even in the next two years.

Pierre Voges of the Nelson Mandela Bay Development Agency said: "We are lucky because we have all the rugby, soccer and cricket that were played at the old Telkom Park [Boet Erasmus] Stadium, and all live music events here."

It appears that small municipalities have been handicapped also by bad planning. Most stadiums did not have business plans before commitments to build them were in place.

According to a report by the Institute for Security Studies, Moses Mabhida Stadium's business plan was compiled only in 2006, after the city made commitments to Fifa to build the stadium.

 

Keeping the venues ticking over

FNB Stadium

Barry Pollen, director of Stadium Management SA, which runs the 90000-seater Soccer City, won a 10-year contract in 2009 to run the venue on a "full financial risk" basis. This means whatever profit the company makes, the company take, but it takes the risk of losses as well.

The stadium cost R3.3-billion to build at R39000 per seat.

It costs around R2.5-million a month to maintain, with an annual turnover of around R100-million. It has hosted major events like Lady Gaga and U2 and Springbok rugby Tests, with attendance figures of 1.3 million in the first year after the World Cup.

Cape Town Stadium

The stadium is at the centre of a heated debate about its future.

The city has launched an investigation to examine its business viability options and whether the stadium should be managed directly by the City of Cape Town or involve the private sector.

The stadium is one of the most expensive in the world, having cost R4.5-billion to build.

The operating budget for the 2011/12 financial year was R56-million - almost twice as much as Soccer City. In that period, it generated an annual income of R13-million and hosted U2, Lady Gaga and Neil Diamond and a Man United game against Ajax Cape Town.

The city secured a R306.5-million loan - with annual repayments of R12.8-million - to supplement funding provided by national and provincial government.

Negotiations are still under way to attract the Western Province Rugby Union to use the stadium.

Moses Mabhida Stadium

The stadium has failed to attract the Sharks rugby franchise away from Kings Park.

In a 2006 report, former city manager Mike Sutcliffe said the upgrading of Kings Park would cost at least R500-million. It was considered too old to use for the World Cup.

Tex Collins, caucus leader for the DA in eThekwini, cannot remember when last the stadium had been filled to capacity since the Soccer World Cup. He says most tickets are given away.

"When there's a football match, they will sell 1000 tickets and give 3000 away," he said. "We have the most beautifully designed white elephant in the country."

According to the stadium's general manager, Simon Ngubeni, the R3.2-billion stadium made R61-million last year, R42.3-million in 2011 and R25.2-million in 2010.

"The total operating expenses were R72-million. The deficit incurred by the stadium is within the approved council budget."

Mbombela Stadium

The R1-billion stadium has an annual operations budget of R12-million.

Stadium manager Roelf Kotze says they have worked hard to increase revenue of between R2-million and R3-million a year.

"We got Bidvest Wits to come and play here, and got the Pumas rugby team to move over."

As Nelspruit is slightly removed from mainstream sports, the stadium manages to attract slightly bigger crowds for games, compared to similar games in the main metropolitan areas, says Kotze.

The venue has hosted around 40 events over the past three years.

Port Elizabeth Stadium

"If you ask me whether a R2.4-billion stadium should have been built in Port Elizabeth, I would say 'no'," says Pierre Voges, CEO of the Nelson Mandela Bay Development Agency, which is responsible for running the Port Elizabeth Stadium.

The city has a small population and has trouble regularly filling the 48000-seater stadium.

"But we have it, so we have to make it work," says Voges.

The stadium was the first one of the six newly built stadiums to be finished.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

Mike123

Posted 123 days ago
Avatar
What hangover?! I seem to remember the spin doctors telling us how wonderful the world cup would be for the country and how it would make huge amounts of money.

buddi

Posted 123 days ago
Avatar
"In the original bid documents the total cost to build all the new World Cup stadiums was R1.6-billion," said Pollen. "It went up to more than R20-billion."

Isn't that what happens in this country - quote one price, and it eventually costs 10x more. Think arms deal, toll roads, NKANDLA!, and many others.
Avatar

TenBears

Posted 123 days ago
Who increased the budget? Why is Group 5 wanting to own up and negotiate leniency in exchange of revealing the truth about their pricing matrix to inflate the prices they got paid? It can be one thing, they ROBBED the country thinking they'll get away with it. So they must return that money back to the municipalities with interest!!! Greed, greed, greed!!!!!
Avatar

skhokho21

Posted 123 days ago
Who inflated those prices, who ownthose companies who build the stadium, lets wait & see, group 5 is going to sing. No business just pick up & run smooth but at a certain point you break even after your debts has been paid. This information has been recycled for ages, why bring it up again, you just want to give the tournament a negative image. We will always be black & white in this country not South Africans.

Jimbo56

Posted 123 days ago
Avatar
This article barely warrants a "No sh!t, Sherlock?"

Gormogon1

Posted 123 days ago
Avatar
The fact is the ANC led government are not critical or forward thinkers. They don’t care about the future impact of their decisions. They only live for today, and what they can get today. Unfortunately, one cannot change the genetic culture of cave dwellers.
Avatar

buddi

Posted 123 days ago
Its easy not to be critical when the money isn't yours.
Avatar

TenBears

Posted 123 days ago
Gormogon - Gomora or what? This has nothing to do with the ANC!!!!! Cave dwellers? Why don't you go back to the ship and sail back to where you came from. Funny enough, you hate cave dwellers but you still cocoon under their midst and in their environment! In addition, one can also not change the culture of ship rowers, they still think they're rowing and the ship has docked since 1652 and the captain of it long died, but his beneficiaries are still here.

i_stub_born

Posted 123 days ago
Avatar
....Of course these tournaments and other circus entertainments generate money....

.....All those crispy 'Benjamin Franklins' are well protected and hidden from the hard african sun inside the deep pockets of the ANC Mafiosi in attendance..........
Avatar

TenBears

Posted 123 days ago
Some people really need a serious mental floss!!! I agree with you on the circus entertainment, yes the Lady Gaga show. That satanic, revolting, grotesque show took place in only two cities! Who ware the majority people who attended it? Your answer is correct, whatever it is, will be the right one! I don't think the ANC Mafioso would have matched the sickening dress code of the day from those who always claim they know better. Cave loins were very much better!
Avatar

i_stub_born

Posted 123 days ago
...In view of your subconscious admiration for the feminine white skin, no doubt you attended that concert with Nivea cream on your face.......

Maxi

Posted 123 days ago
Avatar
Can the media and the half South Africans leave our stadiums alone. These are national pride and we as truly South Africans proud ourselves with these asserts. These stadiums and the 2010 tournament helped to put South Africa in a good shape globally. This tournament helped to prove doom sayers wrong about South Africa being a slaughter house. So so long truly and proudly South Africans do not have issues with these stadiums, stop complaining about them.
Avatar

amaKK

Posted 123 days ago
LOL...the stadia are 'asserts'?

I assume your post was written at attract attention and I am falling for the bait.

An asset, is a useful and valuable entity that generates income.

In a country as ours where football attendance is woeful, a brand, spanking new stadium of billions is neither useful nor valuable. Maybe if we had a thriving league like the Bundesliga, EPL etc but we don't and wont for the foreseeable future.

Explain if you may, the rationale (or lack of) of building Moses Mabida, a spitting distance from King's Park?

Avatar

Maxi

Posted 123 days ago
amaKK
According to my dictionary an asset is something valuable belonging to a person or organization which can be used for the payment of debts. It doesn't necessary have to generate income. This stadiums can be leased or sold to a private entity in the future to generate income. For your information they are used. As someone who does not like soccer you are not aware of this.
Avatar

i_stub_born

Posted 123 days ago
"It doesn't necessary have to generate income."...........really!......your dicktionary does not go beyond the letters A N C..............
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 123 days ago
i_stub_born
I think you will agree with me when I say your house, car and furnisher are part of your assets. Do they generate income for you?
Avatar

i_stub_born

Posted 123 days ago
........I think even YOU might agree that if I rent part of my house and put my car to work as a taxi, then I generate income to pay the house, the car and my furniture. That is an example of using your assets to generate income........

.........and if I enter into debt beyond my capacity to pay it, for whatever "asset" I feel myself entitled, or to boost my ego, or show off, and if I have not made plans on how to repay my debt, then the bank comes and takes my "assets" away and indirectly tells me "you set to be an ass"........The public administration has the same principles...The ANC administration does not have any principles whatsoever, other than to use allocated money to spend lavishly in parties, white elephants and so on.............
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 123 days ago
i_stub_born
Lets not play with words here. I know you are hell bent to win the debate. The fact is the asset remain an asset no matter you use it to generate funds or not. It will remain an asset....full stop.
Avatar

i_stub_born

Posted 123 days ago
...HA HA HA HA.........I don't care two figs about the puerility of winning or losing an argument, of which you, of course, cannot debate, so it is quite easy to duck and slip away. Like all the ANC doped, you put forward some nonsensical statement which cannot be argued on, except by other bona fide commentators who believe in the ideas exchange....and when yourselves feel entrapped by your very same arguments, then just revert to race, DA, "playing with words", etc...

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 123 days ago
Avatar
..... and Fifa walked away with a very hansom profit!

We really do have to look closely at who we allow to make money out of us
Avatar

TenBears

Posted 123 days ago
Momma - so did the stadium construction companies. Unfortunately FIFA is operating at a level of bullish-no care-strong arm process. When you want to host their event, they call the shots whether you like it or not. The guarantees that are given by countries to host the event are horrific, but let's get together and help where we can.
Avatar

Wiseguy

Posted 123 days ago
@Ten Bears.....perhaps President Zuma's friend MR Reddy could help, rumour has it he is about to clear R625 000 000.00 from the City of JHb tender he got at double the cost of the other bidders !
The rest of us will follow his example....shall we?
Avatar

TenBears

Posted 123 days ago
Wiseguy - let the Adjudicating Committee explain why they chose that bid!!! What was the process used to reach the final conclusion of awarding the tender to someone who has charged double the price compared to other bidders? We need this clarity instead of asking the wrong people! Joburg Metro owes the public the explanation to this, not President Zuma.
Avatar

i_stub_born

Posted 123 days ago
......let the tenderpreneurs explain why they were chosen!.......Zuma cannot explain that.....hey, he cannot explain "government" nor "leadership", anything else beyond his loins is too much effort...........

Stirrer

Posted 123 days ago
Avatar
Disregarding the necessity of the construction of these stadiums, I think Pierre Voges has the right attitude when he says "But we have it, so we have to make it work".
With the right professional management teams running these world-class stadiums, they will all eventually break even and start generating income. Sure, some will take longer, but that's the path most businesses follow initially!
Avatar

Jimbo56

Posted 123 days ago
Perhaps it is (the path most businesses follow initially) but business usually makes a decision to acquire an asset based on some sound economic research and has a long term strategy from the start. Zillion rand decisions must not be based on nebulous factors like national pride- let's show 'em we can do it and don't worry, we're sure we can find a use for the stadiums afterwards. That's what happened here, and now we're stuck with stadiums that have no real use. They'll never break even: they're unable to service the debt already so day by day they're falling further behind.

Voges' enthusiasm is well intentioned, but naive.
Avatar

Stirrer

Posted 123 days ago
I still think it is worth trying to recover some costs by appointing professional business people to run the stadiums, Jimbo56 - instead of folding our arms and writing it off.
Besides,what is the alternative - demolishing them?
Avatar

Wiseguy

Posted 123 days ago
Agree with u Stirrer! Don't think we have a choice.