Twelve million going to bed hungry in SA
Image by: The Times / Shelley Christians / Gallo Images
More than 12million South Africans will go to bed hungry tonight.
Though this country produces sufficient food for its population, skyrocketing prices prevent the poor - most of them urban households - from getting adequate nutrition .
The hungriest people are in Cape Town (80%) and Msunduzi, in KwaZulu-Natal (87%).
A five-year study by the University of Cape Town's African Food Security Unit Network has exposed a food crisis that constitutes a "death sentence" for many and which the government has labelled as "serious".
It found that, in Johannesburg, 43% of the poor faced starvation and malnutrition. Researchers believe the figure could be higher.
According to the UN Food and Agricultural Organisation, 870 million people worldwide are chronically undernourished, 234million of them living in sub-Saharan Africa.
The plight of the hungry was highlighted in 2011 when four children, aged between two and nine, died in a farmer's field as they began an 18km walk in search of their mother and food in Verdwaal, North West. It was later discovered that they had not eaten for more than a week.
The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries last week revealed that 12million South Africans are "food insecure".
Food security refers to the ability to access adequate nutrition - food that is affordable, hygienic and culturally accepted.
Food Bank SA spokesman Keri Uys said yesterday: "South Africa is in dire straights. The entire country is affected. It is not just rural areas.
"Every day millions of people go to be bed hungry. There are children whose daily food is half a white-bread sandwich. How can you bring up a nation on this?"
"The implication is a death sentence."
The network's Dr Jane Battersby-Lennard said the University of Cape Town study focused on poor areas in 11 cities in the Southern African Development Community, including Cape Town, Johannesburg and Msunduzi.
The survey covered 1060 households in each city.
Battersby-Lennard said the number of South Africans subject to food insecurity could be far higher than the survey suggested.
"The figures from the surveyed cities show 77% of all households were either moderately or severely food insecure.
"When it comes to South Africa, two of the surveyed cities were higher than this, which is dire. The challenge of food security in our cities is greater than imagined."
She said the problem was access to adequate nutrition, not the availability of food.
"This is because of poverty. People are simply too poor to buy food. On top of this, poor areas have seven times fewer supermarkets than rich areas, making it a struggle to access nutritional food.
"This forces households, especially those that run out of money before the end of the month, to borrow and buy food on credit.
"If supermarkets do move to these [poor] areas it often forces informal food traders out of business, making people more food insecure."
She said the government had identified food security as a "critical challenge".
"Though a higher proportion of rural households face food insecurity, when you look at the different scales of food insecurity - which range from mild to moderate and severe - more urban households fall within the severe food insecurity category.
"Severe food insecurity means households are forced to cut back on meal sizes and numbers, with people going hungry for days. Our urban population is facing severe malnourishment."
The study found two distinct heightened hunger periods - January, and during winter. On average, the poorest households surveyed spent 53% of their income on food.
Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries spokesman Palesa Mokomele said that if 12million people were subject to food insecurity it implied that about 4million households faced starvation.
"These are families often relying on only one kind of food, such as maize, often not in regular supply.
"The government is concerned ... it is a crisis."
Joe Kgobokoe, the department's chief director for food security and agrarian reform, said a "host of programmes" addressed the crisis.
"[The department] promotes food gardens at homes and schools, and assists rural smallhold ers to produce food."


SHARE YOUR OPINION
If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.Mike123
Posted 109 days agoRSA.MommaCyndi
Posted 109 days agoThe discrepancy between farm gate prices and end user prices is a big factor. Transport, Cosatu and Sasol also play their parts. The manipulation of the cost of living index doesn't help much either.
Gormogon1
Posted 109 days agoDuzula
Posted 109 days agoThis is just sickening, people of South Africa wake up and bring change.
Robrt010Mugabe99
Posted 109 days agobuddi
deebee
Sorry Bob, but that statement makes everything that follows complete rubbish. The ANC has become the enemy of the people; the ANC is racist; the ANC is unpatriotic - it is filled with bloody agents!
Duzula
Wake up man.
And you blame apartheid for all this corruption in the ANC government...
Robrt010Mugabe99
Posted 5 minutes ago
govt corruption is nt linked to a black mans hunger/poverty/unemployment, as I said black people were nt dependant on the state they had their own wealth which is livestocks,(cattles,goats,chickens,sheeps,horses,land etc) after they were pushed into the ghettos thats when hunger started. listen from me who is from the farm (talking about something I know nt hearsay, Im here kwa Nongoma, with cattles our parents sent us to universities, being polygamists with 30 children all children go to universities (Ongoye) today you cant have that life, come here kwa Nongoma for understudy how black man lives. On top of that govt provides grants, the report should tell us there are people who wre left out who must be registered for grants, make use of your head, think.
RSA.MommaCyndi
deebee
I think you mean subsistence farming! Sustenance farming probably would feed everyone! :)
Robrt010Mugabe99
Posted 11 minutes ago
farming is business, people have different goals, in each and every business, others want to create jobs for other, others need legacy,others aspired by creativity/innovations , others want better life for themselves with their families,greediness, etc it is nt correct to say when you venture into business it is because you want to meet the needs of the entire society in the world
As I told you our grandfathers were polygamists with 30 children all of them were afforded an opportunity to go to universities.
RSA.MommaCyndi
LoL
Damn dyslexia :-P Thanks for fixing that
Bob Moogabe,
Then the tooth mouse and tinkerbell petitioned santa for some lovely socks
Mahen
Was it also the white man that stole from them or was it the black dictators who robbed their own kind and are still watching them starve?
You clearly are an ANC fool who thinks that they can only blame the white man for all their ills.
Keep on voting for thieves and lets see how much worse the masses will suffer
buddi
Posted 109 days agoJakes_Mathews#
Posted 109 days agoWiseguy
Posted 109 days agoWe as a nation, can have no time(as in ZERO) for self-enriching political leadership!! The tasks we face, as a nation, are of huge proportions, we do not have the luxury, nor can we afford the luxury of lining our senior politicians nests(with public funds) comrade Mugabe! WE need political leadership that puts the needs and the aspirations of the people FIRST.....and that means ALL the people!
This study was done mainly in peri-urban and urban areas.....it did NOT look at our rural areas or those under traditional leadership(undemocratically imposed rule) where the problems is MIUCH worse! Yet, the traditional leaders can do no wrong in the eyes of the ANC ?? The ANC government must, if it still wants to be considered the governmenet of the people, eject all compromised, self-enriching candidates(regardless of position) and put the people of this country FIRST! It should also enter into negotiations with the traditional leadership to bestow title deeds on those 15.5 million people living under the tradional leaders rule! This will empower those people tremendously and empower the entire nation with its positive economic spin-offs! No title deeds for these people----no more public money for traditional leaders!
buddi
I don't think the anc has the vaguest idea where to start with solving the many problems this country has got.
Robrt010Mugabe99
Wiseguy
Posted 109 days ago@Mugabe.....do you have any idea how many freedoms (and some responsibilities-yes!) come with a title deed to the land a person lives on ? Can you imagine cutting out all that tribalistic/cultural "red tape" ? This country would take off economically and if every other sense of the word ! Entrepeneurs(real/proper ones) would flourish......government just needs to facilitate the process!
Robrt010Mugabe99
Stirrer
Posted 109 days agoThere is enough food in the world to feed everyone, but the unsustainable Capitalist economic system determines who is fed, and who remains hungry!
Black-Moses
Wiseguy
Posted 109 days ago2012 Nov 22, city press...."FNB’s CEO for home loans, Jan Kleynhans, said: “FNB does not grant mortgage loans to individual applicants for residential properties that are developed on tribal land, as the individual properties are not held under separate title.”
The same at almost all banks!
From the same article, "FNB’s Kleynhans, said: “Legally, people who currently live on land owned by a tribal authority have no claim to ownership of the land but only rights of occupation.”
He said “in principle” the bank granted “several types of loans” secured in various ways including “rights of cession and traditional mortgage loans”.
“Only on exceptional grounds does the bank grant such loans which are not secured by a traditional mortgage bond and where there is an adequate form of security on the loan. These loans are reviewed on a case by case basis and granted based on low risk and minimal exposure to the bank,” he said.
FNB was asked how many bonds it issued using “permission to occupy” certificates as security in KwaZulu-Natal but had not yet responded."
Robrt010Mugabe99
Wiseguy
Posted 109 days agoRobrt010Mugabe99
Robrt010Mugabe99
Wiseguy
Posted 109 days agoAre these "trouble makers" entitled to their constitutionally outlined human rights as signed by the honourable Mr Mandela?
Robrt010Mugabe99
If I may ask under which Chief do you belong to
Mzungu
Posted 109 days agoHunger is then well deserved, not? Pity for the children.
Sitting under a tree doing nothing else then counting there grants, is better, neh?
RSA.MommaCyndi
Mzungu
Mzungu
RSA.MommaCyndi
Wiseguy
Posted 109 days agoI hail no chief and belong to noone but have allegiance the land and ALL its people comrade Mugabe!
BTW, and for the record I am NOT trying to demonise your or ANY tribal chiefs but am commenting on issues of governance and how it affects the people living under that system of governance !! Big difference! Like Apartheid affected millions, so does the traditional model of governance affect millions.....and just like Apartheid, there is lots of bad governance and decisions of governing involved !!! The needs of the people are deemed subserviant to the needs of the masters(chiefs) in this case!
Traditional governance is of the people, by the chiefs, FOR the CHIEFS
Good democratic governance is of the people, by the people, FOR THE PEOPLE!!
Spot the difference Mugabe?
Robrt010Mugabe99
I like your arguments with African Traditional Leaders is questionable with Queen evrything is perfect
What does Freddie Mercury have to do with anything? - ED
Duzula
Wiseguy
Posted 109 days agoMy allegiance is to this country and ALL its people! Are you able to comprehend that through your tribaly tinted views?
Robrt010Mugabe99
I see you have a problem, to differentiate betwen state and government, these two institutions work hand in glove , unfortunately you cant seperate them. Under no circumstance your allegiance is with state but no to government, whereas the majority has shown interests with the govt of the day, unless it is a undemocratic rule
Wiseguy
Posted 109 days agoRobrt010Mugabe99
my goodness , if they were nt allegiance why did they vote fo such evil regime for 350yrs
The Nationalist government only came into power in 1948, and the major legislation in favour of apartheid was in 1950. Either you are very bad at math, or you don't actually know much about South African history. As to Apartheid, it was a system put in place by a bunch of arch-traditionalists who argued that 'separate development' would be preferable for black people as it wouldn't encroach as much on traditional customs or laws. It is where the regime got its name, and what lay at the root of the Bantustan system, and it is currently one of the issues with land redistribution. Some tribal leaders were compensated for lands seized from their tribe, but the people who actually lived and worked on that land were not. If you are going to argue for traditional leadership, pointing to the apartheid government to fuel emotional blackmail makes zero sense, because you fundamentally agree with it - ED
Black-Moses
@ ED
Your gramma and spelling leave a lot to be desired.
Care to get into specifics? - ED
Robrt010Mugabe99
To ED
shame on you, you think you gonna teach me about SA , let me give you lessons, before 1948 SA was under British colony , what the Britons did , did nt write down all these stupid laws by Verwoed, why , because they were far clever than Verwoeds clan, Britons were practising aprtheid but not in writting, immediately Vrewoed came into power , started writting all this rubbish thats when SA was isolated.
I quote "the union of SA came into being in 1910 with blacks almost completely excluded from parliament" close quote from Eddie Webster et al, 1994, Work and Industrialisation in SA: Kohler Carton& Print, Pinetown.
Why King Shaka,Dingaan,Cetshwayo,Bhambatha were fighting with colonists. shame on you stop being a domkop
Colonialism and Apartheid, though both evils that involved a lot of racism, are not interchangeable terms and you know it. You use the wounds of this country's past to prop up your propaganda, and you do not even have the respect for those who died in the struggle to get it right. Shame on you and your dishonesty -ED
RSA.MommaCyndi
They can't be women as we didn't get the vote until 1930. Ironically, the same year that black men were not allowed to vote any more.
Sasha*-Fierce
Thank you very much for your constructive analysis! Clearly we have got a mosquito in the house but however as one of our intellectually challenged disabled person we need to tolerate and build him until he gets there!
Black Moses
Are you always perfect with your grammar and tense? I agree with you but however I advise you to keep quite next time, that will be so noble as we always makes mistakes so be on a safe side rather than coursing trouble that you might be unable to handle!
If a persons does not know what to say, they normally blame apartheid, grammar, English and racism, move away from those middle aged antics, they will never contribute to the unity in diversity which is constitutionally enshrined, the rights which the likes of Hellen Suzman and Mathew Goniwe, Babla Salooje and Jerry Masemola and ''others'' died for, if you can check all different races died for the freedom we are enjoying at the moment.
Robrt010Mugabe99
========================================================
Colonoliasm + Apartheid = dogsvomit
In actual fact I gave you an academic literature if I were you I would go straight to exclusive books after work , in order to stop embarrassing yourself, disgracefull , in actual fact what is your level of education to tell me about politcs of SA
Sasha*-Fierce
Wiseguy
Posted 109 days agoYou also stated, "these two institutions work hand in glove"....this ONLY occurs in an ideal model of governance, which is VERY unusual the world over! When a democratically elected government starts looking after its own senior politicians needs at the EXPENSE of the state/peoples needs .....that can NO LONGER be considered a hand in glove relationship! That is in fact, grounds for divorce!!!!
Robrt010Mugabe99
RSA.MommaCyndi
I wonder if our own version of Mad Bob is just as old. That brings up the question of why he voted for Hertzhog and lost the black males the vote to start with
Wiseguy
Posted 109 days agoSecondly, I am not here to teach you objective history, as if you could be objective about anything??....go to a library or use the net!
What did MommaC say, the tooth fairy and cindarella may be your best bet at this particular point in time! Cause reality, it has left you....gone! Possibly never to return!
Robrt010Mugabe99
UDFSupporter
Posted 109 days agoSasha*-Fierce
Thank you sir! Mugabe spoke about something relating to ''be going to University'' with Cattle or farm money, with due respect I advise Mugabe to open a case of fraud against the concerned University, for clearly not learning anything of significance yet?
Robrt010Mugabe99
Posted 6 minutes ago
my varsity gave me all and I shared with you to settle the argument I said take what I gave you , the title of the book , everything is clear , unless you dont have money to buy that book, thats what the unversity gave, go and buy the book stop being silly , bring intellectual debate nt sonsense
Sasha*-Fierce
With due respect comrade Mugabe, are trying to write nonsense ibid? That must be nonsense indeed? Hmmmm is nonsense!? Talking about intellectual debate, do you see any on your arguments?
Wiseguy
Posted 109 days agoNo bluffing on my part ?
The only hypocrite here is you, who claims to be a member of the ANC(in good standing) but is unable (for your own selfish reasons no doubt!) to use logic where good clean governance is required!
Remember Mugabe.....good, clean democratic governance is governance of the people, BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE! Now if your arguements(as an ANC member of good standing) were based on that fundmental principal......you wouldn't be a hypocrite! Unfortunately, your arguements are based on the provenly BAD principals of tribal governance....of the people, BY THE CHIEFS, FOR THE CHIEFS!!
PS. Ed, my access to your site is definitely being interfered with!
Robrt010Mugabe99
".....your arguements are based on the provenly BAD principals of tribal governance....of the people, BY THE CHIEFS, FOR THE CHIEFS!!....."===Traditional leaders are recognised by the Const of the RSA , 1996 , Chapter 2, p123, I dont know why you have problem with our Trad leaders or are you still moaning for being recognised after aprtheid
You only problem with me all your arguments have no evidence , thats what we call hogwash/boldadesh/gemmicks
RedCoat
Posted 109 days agoBut given the above comments i wonder if any Koisan sre included in the hunger stats, after all they were removed/chased from their land and with that their access to abundant food sources.
Just had to ask, given certain historical practices are being blamed again.
Cassandra1
Posted 109 days agoArgue as you will, households with fewer children will be better able to afford to feed and educate them - both keys to development.
Can this cultural / religious practice of not exercising proper family planning please go the same way as suttee - soon!
Either that or pass laws that ensure that those of us who do not subscribe to any cultural or religious pressure to overbreed do not have to pay for it.