Zille, Guptas row heats up
Image by: ANTON SCHOLTZ
DA leader Helen Zille has accused top managers of The New Age newspaper - owned by the politically connected Gupta family - of intimidation.
Zille yesterday accused the paper's owner, Atul Gupta, editor Moegsien Williams and CEO of the TNA media group Nazeem Howa of being "heavy-handed" and trying to bully DA federal chairman Wilmot James.
The Guptas, responding through Howa, have denied Zille's accusations.
Zille alleged that Gupta, accompanied by Howa and Williams, had visited DA federal chairman Wilmot James at his Cape Town home last year under the guise of discussing the possibility of a meeting with the party's caucus. During the meeting, she said, James was warned to stop making an enemy of The New Age.
She said James had provoked the men's ire by questioning the Department of Public Enterprises in parliament about the funding by parastatals of The New Age's high-profile breakfast meetings.
"The three adopted a heavy-handed approach. They suggested that it would be best if the DA did not make an enemy of The New Age. [James] said the party would continue asking questions in parliament about the use of public funds," Zille said.
Howa confirmed visiting James at his home but denied telling him to "back off" .
"We certainly discussed the narrow focus of the questions the DA was asking and suggested that the questions be broadened to include other newspapers.
"Mr James, in fact, conceded this point and undertook to raise it within the party structures," said Howa.
The Guptas are known to be close to President Jacob Zuma and their paper has been accused of being sympathetic to him and his government.
It has been revealed that Transnet and Eskom gave R27-million towards the costs of the breakfasts, which politicians, including Zuma, have been invited to attend and speak at.
Zille has been accused of accepting money from the Guptas. She has claimed that the donor was Stephan Nel, an executive director of IT firm Sahara Computers, which is owned by the Guptas. She said he had donated R300000 to the DA in his personal capacity, though the money was received while she was having dinner at the Gupta family complex in Saxonwold in 2009.
"We won't give Stephan Nel's money back; it was [from] a personal account. I can't help it if he's going to newspapers to invent stories," said Zille.
Zille said she had written to Zuma asking him to institute a judicial commission of inquiry to investigate the funding model of The New Age. She has accused the newspaper of being used to channel funds to the ANC.
But the ANC reacted angrily to her claim late yesterday, accusing her of lying to the public.
"If Helen Zille was to be taken seriously she should have called for an investigation of all government expenditure on advertising, using all media.
"By narrowing the focus on The New Age, it is evident that she is not happy for having been exposed by the [newspaper] for who she is, a liar and an unreliable individual," said ANC spokesman Jackson Mthembu.


SHARE YOUR OPINION
If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.Les4uu
Posted 138 days agoRSA.MommaCyndi
Posted 138 days agoYou were played, Zille. You walked straight into this knowing full well that the Guptas were in bed with JZ and that you were getting money from a dodgy source. Spin it until the cows come home but you are scoring all own goals here.
Gormogon1
PaulBobs
PaulBobs
She did not receive a donation from the Gupta's , the DA received one from someoene employed by them. She seemed unaware that the Gupta's would try to leverage that to undermine the principles of the party. In any event the DA refused to be undermined.
PaulBobs
i dont read the New Age, ever, but do you have a link to the article?
PaulBobs
Robrt012Mugabe99
Thought so
RSA.MommaCyndi
Posted 138 days ago(all done in a David Attenborough voice)
Mike123
Funny how similar they all are: trying really hard to cover their own slime trails.
RSA.MommaCyndi
Can you just imagine the comments if the parties were swapped. Almost identical .... except to a trained observer :)
Mike123
Posted 138 days agoPaulBobs
Posted 138 days agoBut the New Age is a different animal, it appears that with the paper and the donation the parties tried to muzzle HZ from asking questions in parliament, and ,when she would not give in, they unleash the newspaer to attack her irrationally. I wonder how the New Age's editor sleeps at night, becoming the mouthpeace for the family......
Stirrer
Posted 138 days agoRSA.MommaCyndi
Posted 138 days agoNever mind the soapy. What is happening with the train crash in Pretoria?
Duzula
Posted 138 days agoThis means that the Guptas family runs South Africa
Stirrer
(except the Rothschilds controlled all the banks, whereas the Gupta's control all the leaders!)
Desmond-ct
Posted 138 days agoPaulBobs
Tjorts
Posted 137 days agoFact - 12,5 million South Africans are going to sleep hungry tonight ...I don't see the DA challenging the Gupta/Shaik/ZumaANC-corruption-mafiosi to follow Motsepe's example and return the 'stolen-from-the-poor-tenderpreneural' loot to honourable organisations in order to create jobs for the poor. Instead wasting time trying to cover-up their ill-gotten gains...
Guptas should be in jail (where Shabir Shaik and Jacob Zuma should be) as we all know their evil and corrupt ways and motives with their biased New Age rubbish newspaper eye-blinder!
...de la Rey, de la Rey?!
KingAfrica
Posted 137 days agochrish
Posted 137 days agobuddi
Posted 137 days agoThe DA received and accepted a donation towards their party in May 2009 - so what?
They wrote a nice 'thank you' letter - so what?
Did they give the New Age or the Guptas anything in return - like a tender, or a contract, or a cell phone, or a car? No - so what?
I don't think the Guptas were as infamous then as they are now, so the DA changed its mind and decided that the New Age and the Guptas were now persona non grata - so what?
We all know the Guptas are actually in bed with the president and the anc, so probably regret donating any money to the DA in any case.
Stirrer
Posted 137 days agoThe DA should hang their head in shame for their role in legitimising this farce!
Wiseguy
Posted 137 days ago;)
bess
Posted 137 days agoOnce it became evident that the Guptas and Zuma were filling each other's pockets Helen Zille REFUSED further donations.
I would say she did the honorable thing, and she certainly hid no facts about these donations from the public.
Sadly Zuma will not match her transparency regarding his economic relationship with the Guptas.
KZN
Posted 137 days agohow about also probing the da's involvement with the wasteman group? the same wasteman group that was prosecuted for dumping medical waste across the country. Did the da not receive "incentives" from wasteman to protect that company's interest?
the double agenda party is still living in the dark age of apartheid. all will be spilt before the 2014 elections.
SuiGeneris
Posted 137 days agoPriorities !!!!
KCUF the 12.5 million poor people who go to bed hungry every night !
With this amount of money they could have started thousands of soup kitchens all over the country to feed these hungry people but NO ! They are too selfish and their glutenous over-sized bellies is much more important !!!!
SuiGeneris
OneShotStott
What the hell were they eating?! You could feed an entire province a breakfast with that type of money - how is it that Eskom is demanding a 16% increase over 5yrs, tallying up to an 80% increase in total as they 'lack the proper funding' and now they throw this type of amount of taxpayers money in our faces....for a breakfast!
It truly boggles my mind - in fact out of all the wrong in our country reported today, this has to be the most insulting and offensive.
Shot ANC - you the man.
shelatt
Posted 137 days agoThe Corruption party does not care a hoot for these people, and here is the proof. The salary bill for the two hundred odd (mostly corrupt) ministers et al runs into the hundreds of millions each year. They do not EARN this, they TAKE it for the least amount of work. How is it possible that Zuma (and his wives) earns more than Obama, the most powerful leader in the world....Come on you moronic Corruption supporters, make me understand why he deserves it. And what's the president of our country doing being a member or director of an untold number of companies and CC's. Does he not receive enough to stave off hunger and misery? It’s absolutely disgusting that he can take in all this money from the tax payers while the poor and indigent (who by the way helped him get voted in) suffer interminably. In fact to put it more succinctly , any politician who has ever indulged in the splurging of taxpayers’ money on self-indulgent pursuits is a disgusting lump of putrid faeces who should be stripped of everything they own and forced to live in a squatter shack for the rest of their lives. Wow, I’ve just realised the whole cabinet of Corruption will have to be moved to what would become the most well known squatter camp in the world....!!!
So you see dumb asses, by voting for these a-holes you are allowing the rape to continue. Having said this I realise there are certain people who HAVE to vote for the Corrupt....those that are already entwined in the quagmire that has been formed over the last few years and who rely on the largesse bestowed on them for playing the money and power game of the untouchables! Are YOU one of those leeches sucking up to the top six????
Now, one of the (unintelligent) arguments over “ who else to vote for...” can be solved right here...If you want to be guaranteed things like service delivery, a decent life for all, top class education among many others, all you need do is threaten the Corrupt with a loss of power. That’s all, just let their majority in parliamentary drop below 60% and watch the change happen instantly!!! Make them realise that power can be removed at the cross of a pen. At the next election arrange with groups of people you associate with to vote for various smaller parties like the ACDP etc so that not one party becomes too dominant. The worst thing you can do is to NOT vote. It is construed as voter apathy and not anti ANCorruption.
Another thought to ponder....What could be so wrong with giving another party just 4 years to prove itself? The Corruption party has taken nearly 20 years to fix poverty with negative results (more poor now than before 1994)and not forgetting losing 30 billion bucks per year to fraud and corruption!!
In just 4 years you can just as easily vote them out if you are not satisfied...simple! Realistically the only party who could make the changes you want is the DA, considering they have a fairly good track record in the Cape....I do also believe that most politicians lie and steal but as long as we have press freedom and involved citizens we can keep it in check.
Go on, give them 4 years, (it’s not a lifetime) and let’s see what they can do!!!!
SuiGeneris
RedCoat
InExile
Posted 137 days ago