Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 41708.73
    UP 1.53%
    Top 40 : 3431.07
    UP 2.69%
    Financial 15 : 11956.82
    UP 1.05%
    Industrial 25 : 47564.07
    UP 1.27%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.5937
    UP 1.72%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.5060
    UP 0.75%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.3333
    UP 1.38%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0934
    UP 1.08%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.3661
    UP 1.13%

  • Gold : 1362.2160
    DOWN -2.21%
    Platinum : 1450.5000
    DOWN -2.32%
    Silver : 22.1625
    DOWN -3.00%
    Palladium : 741.5000
    DOWN -0.20%
    Brent Crude Oil : 104.190
    DOWN -0.58%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Tue May 21 16:44:28 SAST 2013

Access to info act no help: R2K

DENISE WILLIAMS | 19 February, 2013 00:14
Members of the Right2Know campaign hold up cut-out faces of Siyabonga Cwele, Minister of State Security
Image by: SHELLEY CHRISTIANS/THE TIMES

The Right2Know campaign has lashed out at the government for failing to comply with the Promotion of Access to Information Act .

Right2Know spokesman Murray Hunter said yesterday that two out of three requests for information through the act were refused by government departments last year.

"If compliance with the Promotion of Access to Information Act is a litmus test for the state of government and corporate accountability, the signs are worrying," he said.

According to a 2012 survey by the South African History Archive, which facilitates and tracks Promotion of Access to Information Act requests, of the 159 submitted, 102 were either outright refused or simply received no response with the 30-day deadline.

The requests are not only for information held by government departments but corporate/private bodies as well.

"While the 'big ticket' secrets get much attention, many South Africans are denied much more basic information that they need in their daily lives and struggles," said Hunter.

This ranged from information pertaining to housing lists to water pollution, municipal budgets and corruption.

Director of the Institute for Accountability Southern Africa advocate Paul Hoffman said: "The alarm bells are ringing."

He added that the government appeared to be preparing " for the more secret and less open form of administration".

The government also recently refused to provide detailed information on the R206-million upgrade to President Jacob Zuma's private Nkandla residence, citing security concerns as the homestead was a national key point.

Hunter said the National Key Point Act was an apartheid-era national security law and that the number of national key points had grown by more than 54% in the past five years.

Hunter said the campaign had filed an application to force the South African Police Service to make the list of national key points public.

"[The police] initially refused this application, but we have appealed, and a response is due at the end of February," he said.

Police spokesman Zweli Mnisi referred all queries to Brigadier Phuti Setati, who was unavailable for comment.

Government spokesman Phumla Williams was also not available for comment.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

RSA.MommaCyndi

Posted 91 days ago
Avatar
The more things change the more they go back to being exactly as they were. Those Nats taught our ANC well. Mushroom management all the way

BokfanSaffer

Posted 91 days ago
Avatar
Anybody still supporting the anc is a human rights criminal.

Sasha*-Fierce

Posted 91 days ago
Avatar
True, I have been involved in the drafting of the Bill, we were forced through political duress to produce the legislation which will silence the media and law enforcement agencies against political heads who are stealing and misusing public funds.
The President will pass the Bill to protect individual and party corruption and nothing else.
The Bill was enacted by politicians to serve only one purpose which is to protect themselves in order to do crime using public resources and funds. The Bill failed the constitutionality test embarrassingly but had to go through because of political pressure and undue influence.

Wiseguy

Posted 91 days ago
Avatar
@MommaC, "mushroom management"...LOL, as in keep them(us the citizens) in the dark and feed us sh!t!! Ha ha ....good one MommaC! Would be funny if it didn't hurt!

Sigh, so is the "operation vula" brigade is actually the "operation vala" brigade afterall?

Jakes_Mathews#

Posted 91 days ago
Avatar
Useless draconian legislation to advance corruption and looting. Probably that legislation was solely manufactured to protect the hanging genitalia to loot as he pleases.