• All Share : 48362.22
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Top 40 : 4183.85
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Financial 15 : 13650.32
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Industrial 25 : 54866.52
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • ZAR/USD : 10.5025
    UP 0.12%
    ZAR/GBP : 17.6427
    UP 0.24%
    ZAR/EUR : 14.4868
    UP 0.03%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.1026
    UP 0.17%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.7958
    UP 0.14%

  • Gold : 1294.9000
    UP 0.39%
    Platinum : 1407.5000
    UP 0.32%
    Silver : 19.5700
    UP 0.20%
    Palladium : 794.0000
    UP 0.63%
    Brent Crude Oil : 109.530
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Sat Apr 19 17:14:48 SAST 2014

Mexican leftists, Uruguay propose legalising dagga

Reuters, Sapa-AP | 16 November, 2012 10:35
Marijuana plants. File photo
Image by: Paula Bronstein / Getty Images

Mexico's leftist Democratic Revolution Party has suggested their nation legalise marijuana, and Uruguay's government is formulating plans to be the nation's top pot dealer.

This comes after legalising recreational marijuana use won on popular ballots in Colorado and Washington.

Two lawmakers from Mexico’s leftist Democratic Revolution Party have submitted a proposal to legalise marijuana.

A recent poll suggests most Mexicans oppose the idea.

Mexico has already decriminalised the possession of small amounts of marijuana. But the proposal submitted Thursday to the lower house of Congress would regulate legal production and distribution of marijuana, with the aim of removing a source of illegal revenue for Mexico’s drug cartels.

The Parametria polling firm says an August poll of 500 Mexicans showed 86% opposed legalising the drug. The poll had a margin of error of 4.4%.

Legislators in Uruguay have submitted a similar measure.

The proposal formally introduced to Uruguay's Congress on Thursday would create a National Cannabis Institute with the power to license people and companies to produce marijuana for recreational, medical or industrial uses.

It also would allow anyone to grow as many as to six pot plants and produce up to 480 grams (17 ounces) of marijuana in their own homes.

People could join clubs of up to 15 marijuana users who together could grow up to 90 plants and stockpile 7,200 grams of marijuana a year. The identity of buyers would remain protected by law.

Ruling party Deputy Sebastian Sabini says the proposals now in committee are likely to pass Congress by year’s end.

Questions on how to move forward in US

Meanwhile the Obama administration’s relative silence on moves to legalise recreational marijuana in Colorado and Washington has left officials in those Western states unsure how to move forward without running afoul of the US federal government.

But change is already afoot when it comes to how the two states and local authorities deal with marijuana.

Prosecutors in Washington state’s two most populous counties, encompassing Seattle and Tacoma, and in Colorado’s Boulder County are already dropping pot possession cases after state voters chose to legalise pot for recreational adult use.

Washington and Colorado became the first states in the nation to legalise recreational marijuana on Nov. 6, putting both on a possible collision course with the federal government, which says pot remains an illegal narcotic under US law. A similar move to legalise pot in Oregon failed.

Elsewhere, a pair of lawmakers in Maine and Rhode Island plan to introduce legislation to regulate and tax pot sales.

Colorado and Washington could eventually be forced to spend millions of dollars combined to establish bureaucracies to oversee marijuana sales — funds that might be at risk in any federal crackdown. But if legalisation goes ahead, the states could also reap a tax windfall.

Because the drug remains illegal under federal law, state officials say they are looking to the US Department of Justice for guidance.

“I think they’re taking it seriously, and my hope is they really do say something definitive,” Colorado Attorney General John Suthers said in a phone interview.

Suthers, a Republican, said one of the Obama administration’s options would be to tell Colorado officials to “proceed at your own risk” with legalisation, but he added that would put his state in a tough spot if the federal government later changes course.

“It would be an expenditure of time and effort that I prefer not to do, if in fact the federal government is going to take an aggressive posture,” Suthers said.

In a letter to US Attorney General Eric Holder on Tuesday, Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper, a Democrat, and Suthers asked if the federal government would sue to block legalisation or if US officials would view state employees who oversee the pot trade as “acting in violation of federal law.”

Washington’s Democratic Governor Chris Gregoire, who opted not to run for re-election and whose term ends in January, said she met this week with Deputy Attorney General James Cole to discuss legalisation in her state.

End of possession bans

The pot measures approved in Washington state and Colorado would each allow personal possession of up to an ounce of marijuana, a provision set to go into effect within three weeks.

They would also set up systems to regulate and tax the sale of pot at special stores to adults aged 21 and older.

But the initiatives allow lawmakers in each state to spend much of 2013 creating rules and regulations for state-sanctioned pot growing and sales operations.

The Department of Justice has said that marijuana remains a controlled substance and that the department was “reviewing the ballot initiatives.” Federal officials have said little publicly beyond that statement.

Jodie Underwood, special agent in the Drug Enforcement Administration Seattle field division, said her office would not change the way it targets criminal operations. “The state law is not going to change how the DEA operates,” she said.

The DEA has about 5 000 special agents and is tasked with stopping illegal narcotics from being smuggled into the United States and from being produced and distributed within the country itself.

“They want to focus on international traffickers and they want local police to do this stuff in the cities, and when a state like Colorado or Washington says we’re not going to do this anymore, the feds, they’re panicking,” said Tim Lynch, director of the Cato Institute’s Project on Criminal Justice.

Beau Kilmer, co-director of the RAND Corporation’s Drug Policy Research Center, said many branches of the federal government could be involved in dealing with pot legalisation, including the Internal Revenue Service, which could deny deductions or credits to businesses that sell recreational pot.

Even before the recreational legalisation votes, both Colorado and Washington were among 18 states that allow medical pot, and both have private dispensaries of the drug.

In Washington state, the Office of Financial Management has estimated that taxes on marijuana could generate $532 million in fiscal year 2015, the first full year of legalised sales if they are not blocked by the federal government.

Up-front costs of legalisation are expected to exceed $3 million, according to the Office of Financial Management.  

In Colorado, questions linger after Suthers said the state cannot collect taxes of up to 15% on pot sales without further voter approval, casting doubt on how quickly legalisation can be implemented.

State officials said the Department of Revenue would need $1,3 million in the fiscal year beginning in July 2013 for licensing, regulation and enforcement costs.

Anti-drug groups say any taxes states might collect from marijuana would fail to compensate for the increased health, drug treatment and public safety costs that legalisation would cause due to increased use of the drug.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.
Sat Apr 19 17:14:48 SAST 2014 ::