Islamic State confirms ‘Jihadi John’ was killed

20 January 2016 - 10:25 By ASHLEY SOUTHALL

A eulogy for the Islamic State’s most notorious executioner appeared online in the group’s official, English-language magazine, confirming that the militant known as “Jihadi John” was killed in an airstrike last year in northern Syria. The U.S. military said in November that it was “reasonably certain” that the militant, whose name was Mohammed Emwazi, was killed in an airstrike near Raqqa, Syria, a stronghold of the Islamic State. But confirmation had proved elusive.The eulogy in the magazine, Dabiq, seemed to erase any doubt. It identified Emwazi by his assumed name, Abu Muharib al-Muhajir, and said he had been killed on Nov. 12 when the car he was riding in was hit by an airstrike carried out by a remotely piloted drone. The car was destroyed, and he was killed instantly, according to Dabiq.Emwazi, a naturalized British citizen born in Kuwait, rose to prominence in 2014 when the Islamic State released separate videos of a masked man who spoke English with a British accent beheading the journalists James Foley and Steven J. Sotloff. Among his other victims were Kenji Goto, a journalist, and Haruna Yukawa, an adventurer, both Japanese; Peter Kassig, an American aid worker; and Alan Henning and David Cawthorne Haines, British aid workers.“His harshness toward” non-Muslims, the article said, using a derogatory Arabic word, “was manifested through deeds that enraged all the nations, religions and factions of kufr, the entire world bearing witness to this.” Kufr is the Arabic word for disbelief.The Washington Post revealed his identity in February, touching off intense examination of the causes of radicalization among Muslim immigrants in Europe.Civil liberties advocates criticized any official British attempt to kill Emwazi as possibly unlawful, in a debate that paralleled the criticism over the Obama administration’s decision to target and kill Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born cleric, in Yemen in 2011.Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain defended the strike targeting Emwazi as an act of self-defense, and the United States considers such strikes against specific militant leaders to be lawful acts of war or self-defense.British officials were unable to stop Emwazi from traveling to Syria in 2013, although he had been identified as a security threat years earlier.As a British citizen, he personified the concerns of security forces worried about a resurgence in homegrown radicalism inspired by the hard-line ideology of the Islamic State. Foreign fighters have been pouring into Syria from Western countries. Source: (c) 2016 New York Times News Service..

There’s never been a more important time to support independent media.

From World War 1 to present-day cosmopolitan South Africa and beyond, the Sunday Times has been a pillar in covering the stories that matter to you.

For just R80 you can become a premium member (digital access) and support a publication that has played an important political and social role in South Africa for over a century of Sundays. You can cancel anytime.

Already subscribed? Sign in below.



Questions or problems? Email helpdesk@timeslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00.