Privinvest and Safa argue that if the payments were not lawful and they are liable to Mozambique then Nyusi should be liable to them.
Nyusi, however, says he is entitled to immunity as a sitting head of state. He was not in court on Tuesday but his lawyer, Rodney Dixon, argued there was “no difference as a matter of law” between someone trying to sue Nyusi in London or Britain's King Charles in Australia.
Nyusi's bid for immunity is the latest twist in the long-running dispute, centred on three deals between state-owned companies and Privinvest, ostensibly to develop Mozambique's fishing industry and for maritime security.
The deals were funded in part by loans and bonds from Credit Suisse — since taken over by UBS — and backed by undisclosed Mozambican government guarantees.
But hundreds of millions of dollars went missing and, when the state loan guarantees became public in 2016, donors such as the International Monetary Fund halted support, triggering a currency collapse, debt crisis and years of litigation.
Reuters
Mozambique President Nyusi claims immunity in London 'tuna bond' case
Image: Siphiwe Sibeko/Reuters
Mozambican President Filipe Nyusi on Tuesday asked London's high court to block allegations he accepted unlawful payments in the country's lawsuit against Credit Suisse and others over the $2bn (R36.2bn) “tuna bond” scandal.
The tuna bond or “hidden debt” case has triggered criminal investigations from Maputo to New York, plus a series of lawsuits in London involving Credit Suisse, shipbuilder Privinvest, its owner Iskandar Safa and many others.
Mozambique, one of the world's poorest countries, wants to revoke a sovereign guarantee on a loan it alleges was corruptly procured and secure compensation for other alleged wrongdoing.
But the cases in London have been mired in difficulties ahead of a trial scheduled for October as Mozambique's repeated failure to disclose key documents has threatened to derail the litigation.
Privinvest and Safa are trying to drag Nyusi into the case, arguing he should contribute to any damages they may be ordered to pay if they are found liable to Mozambique.
Their claim against Nyusi focuses on payments of $11m (R199m) they say Privinvest made in 2014 to fund Nyusi's successful run for president and his ruling Frelimo party's election campaign.
Ex-Mozambique finance minister pleads not guilty in New York over debt scandal
Privinvest and Safa argue that if the payments were not lawful and they are liable to Mozambique then Nyusi should be liable to them.
Nyusi, however, says he is entitled to immunity as a sitting head of state. He was not in court on Tuesday but his lawyer, Rodney Dixon, argued there was “no difference as a matter of law” between someone trying to sue Nyusi in London or Britain's King Charles in Australia.
Nyusi's bid for immunity is the latest twist in the long-running dispute, centred on three deals between state-owned companies and Privinvest, ostensibly to develop Mozambique's fishing industry and for maritime security.
The deals were funded in part by loans and bonds from Credit Suisse — since taken over by UBS — and backed by undisclosed Mozambican government guarantees.
But hundreds of millions of dollars went missing and, when the state loan guarantees became public in 2016, donors such as the International Monetary Fund halted support, triggering a currency collapse, debt crisis and years of litigation.
Reuters
READ MORE:
Zimbabwe president declares state of disaster in Harare due to rubbish piling up in streets
Any attack on French interests in Niger will spur swift response: Macron
Central African Republic referendum could extend Touadera's rule
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
News and promos in your inbox
subscribeMost read
Latest Videos