Ombud backs gym members

03 November 2015 - 02:11 By Wendy Knowler


It was a headline bound to capture my attention: "Gym contract issues form 75% of consumer complaints". I do get a steady stream of gym-related complaints, but they make up nowhere near 75% of my inbox - car and cellphone dramas account for the lion's share.On reading that story, published last week, a different statistic emerged: "75% of complaints to the National Consumer Commission about gyms related to contract cancellation issues."Now that does not surprise me.Many people are told they cannot cancel early, despite the law allowing them to do so, in writing, with 20 business days' notice, for a "reasonable" cancellation fee (see sidebar).The other big issue is members not realising that their contracts do not automatically end on the expiry date as the word "expiry" implies: instead they roll over to a month-to-month basis unless the member pro-actively cancels, in writing, giving a month's notice.Yes, the written cancellation requirement is in the small print of all gym contracts, but sadly overlooked by most.That is why the law compels gyms to contact contract holders 40 to 80 business days before the contract's expiry date, and notify them "in writing or any recordable form" of the imminent expiry of their contract, warning them that it will automatically continue unless they either tell the company to terminate the agreement or renew it for another fixed term.The legislators' intention was to put an end to companies keeping quiet and profiting from consumers' assumption that their contract lapsed on the expiry date.The words "in writing or any recordable form" are significant, because in the event of a dispute, evidence is required.I recently reported on a case of a gym owner claiming a member was notified, by phone, but that the system had since crashed so there was no recording. The member had not realised that her membership - and debit order - were still active many months after she thought the contract had expired.Commenting on that case at the time, Ombudsman for Consumer Goods and Services advocate Neville Melville said: "It might ordinarily be enough to say 'this is the business practice and it is followed without fail', but here the law refers to 'recordable', and this raises the bar."To my mind, it follows that if a company cannot prove that it notified a customer of their options 40 to 80 days before their contract's "expiry date", it has no right to continue to debit their bank account after that expiry date.I was more than a little surprised to discover that the commission feels differently.Spokesman Trevor Hattingh put it like this: "As much as the law requires the supplier to notify the consumer in a recordable form of the impending expiry of a contract, it also requires from the consumer to actually cancel a contract upon its expiry or at any other time. There is thus a shared responsibility."What is very clear in the law is that the one party's obligation is not dependent on that of the other."So bearing in mind that gyms, and other companies offering fixed-term contracts, would really prefer their customers not to cancel their contracts, there appears to be nothing to stop them from simply claiming that they notified a customer that their contract would roll over to month-to-month if they did no t cancel.Failure to provide proof that the notification was indeed delivered does not let the consumer off the hook, according to the commission.I wonder then, does it follow that a consumer can simply claim they did cancel, without providing any proof?Given that the Consumer Goods and Services Ombudsman is obliged to "offer guidance to participants in the industry as to the implementation of and the compliance with the Consumer Protection Act" and to educate the public of its rights, I asked Melville for his view."A fixed-term agreement expires at the end of the term unless the supplier gave the proper notification in terms of Section 14(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act," he said."If that is done, the contract will roll over on a month-to-month basis unless the consumer cancelled it."If there is no such notification, the contract is ended and there is no obligation to cancel or further obligation to pay."And the ombud's office, happily for consumers, does require evidence in determining cases.Still in limboBetween 2013 and 2014 the National Consumer Commission launched a probe into gym contracts at Body Lab, Planet Fitness, Maponya Mall Gym and Alberton Sports and Fitness. It focused on high cancellation fees and allegations of misleading marketing information given by gym staff.It was recommended that the commission approach the National Consumer Tribunal to determine a "reasonable" cancellation fee."The commissioner, Ebrahim Mohamed, is currently considering the recommendations made by the investigators, and we are likely to lodge the matter with the tribunal," said commission spokesman Trevor Hattingh.Tip: Always ask a gym's cancellation policy before signing up, and make sure it is specified, in detail, in the contract.CONTACT WENDY:Email: consumer@knowler.co.zaTwitter: @wendyknowler

This article is reserved for Sunday Times subscribers.

A subscription gives you full digital access to all Sunday Times content.

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.

Registered on the BusinessLIVE, Business Day, Financial Mail or Rand Daily Mail websites? Sign in with the same details.



Questions or problems? Email helpdesk@timeslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00.

X