Its remuneration policy said up to 3.5% of annual payroll would be allocated based on each individual’s performance rating as long as the company achieved 85% of its performance target — which it did in 2014.
“The [CCMA] commissioner found that the affected employees were presented with a fait accompli as the decision not to pay the bonuses was not preceded by any consultation‚” said the judge.
“He also rejected the reason provided by Johannesburg Water that the [senior] employees were subjected to a collective punishment for the unsatisfactory organisational performance.
“Mr Tavaria could not have known that he was going to be held responsible for the performance of his [senior] colleagues. It is inescapable that the decision not to pay the bonuses ... was injudicious as it deprived deserving employees like Mr Tavaria of a well-entrenched benefit.”