On his arrest he was found in possession of cellphones belonging to the missing couple.
In his judgement‚ Kathuravaloo said the teen had not proffered any compelling evidence that proved exceptional circumstances that warranted his release on bail.
“His failure to explain the presence of the cellphones to this court cannot be excused by his attorney’s submission that he was not questioned about them. If there was an innocent explanation he should have offered this. This court is of the view that he [Xulu] needs to go further and explain how the got the cellphones and from whom‚” he said.
Kathuravaloo returned to a brief statement Xulu had made during his first appearance‚ when he insisted he had a lot to tell the court. “If indeed he has a lot to tell the court I haven’t heard any of it. If the applicant is to be believed that he has a lot to say then he is deliberately concealing information from this court‚” he added.
“His possession of the cellphones indicates that he has associated himself with a criminal conspiracy‚” the magistrate said in summation.
Xulu and his co-accused will return to court on April 12‚ where the co-accused Patel is expected to put in a bail application.