Businessman Peter-Paul Ngwenya's use of k-word costs him R24,000

07 May 2020 - 15:49 By Penwell Dlamini
subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now
Peter-Paul Ngwenya with his legal representative at the Randburg magistrate's court.
Peter-Paul Ngwenya with his legal representative at the Randburg magistrate's court.
Image: Thulani Mbele

Businessman Peter-Paul Ngwenya has been fined R24,000 or 12 months' imprisonment for using the k-word to refer to his former friend.

NPA spokesperson Phindi Mjonondwane confirmed to SowetanLIVE on Thursday that Ngwenya was sentenced in the Randburg magistrate’s court.

“He was fined R24,000 or 12 months' imprisonment, wholly suspended for three years on condition that he is not found guilty of crimen injuria in that time,” Mjonondwane said.

Ngwenya was found guilty of crimen injuria last year. He was accused of calling his long-time friend Fani Titi a “QwaQwa k****r” and “Bantustan boss” in a text message. The message was intended for Aqeel Patel, the MD of MRC Media.

He was acquitted on the two counts of contravening protection orders. In the same text message, Ngwenya told Patel “you will bleed” and that Titi “will see his mother”.

Titi regarded this as a threat to his life as Ngwenya knew his mother had died. The conflict between Ngwenya and Titi, who had been friends for 20 years, stemmed from a multimillion-rand deal that turned sour.

Ngwenya argued through his lawyers that the k-word only became offensive when it was used by a white person to a black person. But magistrate Pravina Raghoonandan said Ngwenya had a history of contributing to the struggle against apartheid. Therefore, she said, he should have known that the use of the k-word amounted to hate speech and would impair Titi’s dignity.

Ngwenya spent five years on Robben Island during apartheid.

Mjonondwane said she would verify if this was the first case of a black person being convicted and sentenced for using the k-word.

“If indeed it is the first judgment of the court, it shows to say that the use of the k-word cannot be tolerated regardless of the race of the person using it,” she said.


subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now