“It is worth noting that the complaint from the ATM party does not fall squarely on the Ipid mandate in terms of section 28(1) of the Ipid Act, which specifies a list of offences that can be exclusively investigated by Ipid.
“Section 28(1)(h) provides that Ipid can investigate any offences referred to it as a result of a decision by the executive director, or if requested by the minister, MEC or secretary of police.”
She said the directorate has requested the author of the letter from ATM to present himself to Ipid for an interview.
Ipid 'needs more facts' before deciding to probe police role in Phala Phala saga
Image: SIPHIWE SIBEKO
The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (Ipid) said on Friday it has not fully assessed the request by the African Transformation Movement (ATM) to probe the conduct of police after the theft at President Cyril Ramaphosa's Phala Phala farm.
This was because of the limited information in the ATM's letter of complaint, it said.
Ipid spokesperson Lizzy Suping said it received a letter from the ATM dated June 21, requesting the directorate to investigate the alleged conduct of the police on the theft at the president's farm in Limpopo in 2020.
“It is worth noting that the complaint from the ATM party does not fall squarely on the Ipid mandate in terms of section 28(1) of the Ipid Act, which specifies a list of offences that can be exclusively investigated by Ipid.
“Section 28(1)(h) provides that Ipid can investigate any offences referred to it as a result of a decision by the executive director, or if requested by the minister, MEC or secretary of police.”
She said the directorate has requested the author of the letter from ATM to present himself to Ipid for an interview.
The request for the interview forms part of an investigation.
“However, the interview process will assist Ipid to assess whether a full investigation is warranted on the alleged conduct of the police in the Phala Phala farm matter.
“It is after the formal statement has been obtained from the ATM that the executive director of Ipid would make a determination on whether such a case can be fully investigated by Ipid under section 28(1)(h).”
TimesLIVE
Support independent journalism by subscribing to the Sunday Times. Just R20 for the first month.
READ MORE:
MAKHUDU SEFARA | It turns out Ramaphosa and Zuma are cut from the same cloth
Phala Phala probe no reason to set aside Mkhwebane suspension: Ramaphosa
'He won't come out alive' — Shivambu says Ramaphosa won't survive upcoming motion of no confidence
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most read
Latest Videos