Cell C insists data deal is available after advertising regulator ruled against mobile operator

‘The offer is still on,’ says mobile operator

03 February 2023 - 11:09
subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now
Cell C was found guilty of misleading advertising for promoting a deal which a complainant submitted is not available. It insists the deal is available.
Cell C was found guilty of misleading advertising for promoting a deal which a complainant submitted is not available. It insists the deal is available.
Image: Supplied

Private mobile operator Cell C, found guilty of promoting unavailable contracts by the Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB), has struck back, insisting the deal is legitimate and continues to be available.

The conflict arose when a customer laid a complaint against a Cell C advertisement and online brochure promoting month-to-month deals. She submitted page 10 of the brochure as the basis of her complaint.

The customer said she wanted to sign up for the advertised data and voice month-to-month contract, SIM only, R99 deal. She called a Cell C store and was told by an agent the advertised deals were not available. This prompted her to make a formal complaint, accusing Cell C of false and misleading advertising.

Following up the complaint, the ARB contacted Cell C for its response and was told the company “does not submit to the ARB’s authority and jurisdiction”.

Cell C chief legal officer Zahir Williams told TimesLIVE: “The customer complaint was determined by ARB without any input from Cell C. The ARB is a voluntary and not a regulatory organisation whose rules apply to members only. Cell C is not a member of the ARB and therefore not obligated to participate in its complaints processes. Customers with complaints are encouraged to engage with our customer care team and also have the option of lodging complaints with the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa.”

The ARB considered the complaint “based on the information at hand” because it was obligated to “consider and issue a ruling to its members [which is not binding on non-members]” on any complaint.

“If you are not a member and do not submit to the jurisdiction of the ARB, the ARB will consider and rule on your advertising for the guidance of its members. The ARB will rule on whatever is before it when making a decision for the guidance of its members. This ruling will be binding only on ARB members and on broadcasters in terms of the Electronic Communications Act,” the ARB said.

The board found that because the customer was unable to purchase the advertised deal, the advertisement was misleading.

However, Cell C has objected to the finding, saying the deal is available and the advertised promotion was therefore not false.

“Cell C retails the offer in question, which is available online and at select stores. Cell C is therefore not misleading any customer with this offer, which will continue to be advertised in store until February 13,” Williams said.

TimesLIVE

Support independent journalism by subscribing to the Sunday Times. Just R20 for the first month.


subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.