ConCourt rules Aarto Act is valid and not unconstitutional

Constitutional Court rules in favour of minister of transport, says Aarto Act is constitutionally valid

12 July 2023 - 11:57
subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now
The Constitutional Court decided against the high court ruling on a case brought against the government by civil activist group Outa. The high court had found Aarto to be unconstitutional and invalid and ordered that it be scrapped. File photo.
The Constitutional Court decided against the high court ruling on a case brought against the government by civil activist group Outa. The high court had found Aarto to be unconstitutional and invalid and ordered that it be scrapped. File photo.
Image: Thapelo Morebudi

The Constitutional Court has ruled the Aarto Act should remain in place, overturning the Pretoria high court judgment that the act was invalid and unconstitutional.

The ConCourt was to validate the high court ruling but chief justice Raymond Zondo ruled in favour of the minister of transport, who was the respondent in the matter. 

This means the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences (Aarto) Act will not be scrapped, as parliament had the competence to pass it, Zondo said. 

“In a unanimous judgment written by me, the Constitutional Court has upheld the contentions advanced by the minister of transport, the Road Traffic Infringement Agency [RTIA] and the Road Traffic Management Corporation [RTMC] that the subject matter of the Aarto Act falls within the functional area described as 'road traffic regulation' ... which is within the concurrent legislative competence of parliament and the provincial legislatures.

“This court has concluded in this judgment that parliament had the competence to pass the Aarto Act,” he said. 

This means the legislation — intended to penalise traffic violations, legalise fines by e-mail and introduce a demerit system that would strip repeat offenders of their licences — will go ahead as planned.

The ConCourt judgment comes after the Pretoria high court ruled in favour of the civil group Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) which brought the matter for the judiciary to have the legislation thrown out.

Outa’s main contention was the Aarto Act was more concerned about making money than road safety and was against the constitution.

Outa believes the act infringes on the rights of drivers and owners of vehicles as it deems fines “delivered” if sent by post or e-mailed. In addition, 50% of the fines and admin fee will go to the RTIA, resulting in municipalities losing half the revenue generated by fines.

They argued that instead of traffic regulations being governed nationally, they should vest with provincial and municipal authorities as the act would overrule some municipal bylaws.

The RTMC defended Aarto, saying the act is fundamentally concerned with road traffic regulations and should fall under national legislation.

TimesLIVE

Support independent journalism by subscribing to TimesLIVE Premium. Just R20 for the first month.


subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.