US appeals court rejects Trump's emergency bid to curtail birthright citizenship

20 February 2025 - 07:02 By Nate Raymond
subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now
Gladys Vega, president and CEO of La Colaborativa, Brazilian Worker Centre and Lawyers for Civil Rights, speaks at a press conference about their lawsuit filed against the Trump administration executive order that would strip birthright US citizenship from the children of immigrant parents, in Chelsea, Massachusetts, on January 21.
Gladys Vega, president and CEO of La Colaborativa, Brazilian Worker Centre and Lawyers for Civil Rights, speaks at a press conference about their lawsuit filed against the Trump administration executive order that would strip birthright US citizenship from the children of immigrant parents, in Chelsea, Massachusetts, on January 21.
Image: REUTERS/Lauren Owens Lambert/ File photo

A US appeals court on Wednesday let stand an order blocking President Donald Trump from curtailing automatic birthright citizenship nationwide as part of the Republican's hardline crackdown on immigration and illegal border crossings.

The San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Trump administration request to pause the lower-court judge's order.

It was the first time an appellate court had weighed in on Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, whose fate may ultimately be decided by the US Supreme Court.

Trump's justice department had asked the appellate court to issued an emergency stay that would largely pause that decision while it pursued an appeal, saying Seattle-based US District judge John Coughenour went too far by issuing a nationwide injunction at the behest of four Democratic-led states.

The executive order remains separately blocked by judges in Maryland, Massachusetts and New Hampshire. The justice department is pursuing appeals in the Maryland and Massachusetts cases as well.

Trump's order, signed on his first day back in the White House on January 20, directed US agencies to refuse to recognise the citizenship of children born in the US after Tuesday if neither their mother nor father is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident.

Lawsuits were quickly filed by Democratic state attorneys general, immigrant rights advocates and others, who argued the order violated the citizenship clause of the US constitution's 14th Amendment, which has long been understood to recognise that virtually anyone born in the US is a citizen.

They say the US Supreme Court clearly ruled in 1898 in the case US v. Wong Kim Ark that the 14th Amendment guarantees the right to birthright citizenship regardless of a child's parent's immigration status.

Coughenour, an appointee of Republican former President Ronald Reagan, was the first judge to block the order, which he did by issuing a temporary restraining order on January 23. He later extended that into an indefinite preliminary injunction.

Coughenour's decision came in a lawsuit by the Democratic-led states of Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon and several pregnant women. He has called Trump's order “blatantly unconstitutional”.

Reuters


subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.