“The provisions of section 160(3) of the Constitution are mirrored by Rule 18.1 of the Rules of Order adopted by the first respondent on September 6 2007‚ which Rules regulate meetings of the Council‚” said Bobani‚ explaining that a quorum of the Council or a Committee of the Council should constitute a majority (50% plus 1) of all Councillors or Councillors who are members of that Committee as the case may be.
“A majority of council members of the Municipality were not present when the motion of no confidence was voted on by the members of council on August 24.
“Accordingly‚ the vote was unconstitutional‚ and that unconstitutional decision must urgently be set aside. In consequence of the unconstitutional conduct as aforesaid‚ a senior official of the first respondent was prejudiced and the position has been left vacant as a result.”
The papers cite all 120 councillors as respondents.