Pravin Gordhan vs Julius Malema hate speech wrangle heads to high court
Public enterprises minister Pravin Gordhan's hate speech complaint against EFF leader Julius Malema and his deputy Floyd Shivambu has been transferred to the high court.
Gordhan lodged a complaint in the Equality Court against Malema and Shivambu after public utterances they made against him in November 2018 which he believed contravened section 10 of the Equality Act.
Malema, who was speaking outside the state capture commission of inquiry in Johannesburg, accused Gordhan of being corrupt and being a lackey of white monopoly capital, among other slurs.
Malema and Shivambu asked the Johannesburg magistrate's court last week to transfer the matter to the South Gauteng high court where the pair will challenge section 10 of the Equality Act, which deals with words that amount to hate speech.
On Monday magistrate Nishani Beharie transferred the matter to the high court.
"The magistrate's court lacks jurisdiction to determine the constitutionality of the legislation," Beharie said in her judgment.
Beharie said there were larger issues to be determined. A date is yet to be set for the matter to be heard in the high court.
Malema publicly accused Gordhan of being "corrupt", "a dog of white monopoly capital" and of hating black people.
Gordhan said the statements were intended to be hurtful, incite harm and promote hatred, and thus constituted hate speech, as contemplated by the act.
Gordhan is seeking an unconditional apology from Malema and Shivambu and R150,000 in damages.
He said, if successful, the damages claimed would be donated to a charitable organisation that supported job creation for unemployed youth.
At the time of lodging the complaint, Gordhan described Malema and Shivambu's utterances as "absolutely nonsensical" and unsubstantiated attacks.
"Enough is enough," Gordhan said.
"The determined defence of corruption and the corrupt using personal attacks, racism and alleged hate speech is not acceptable and must be challenged," Gordhan said in a statement after he had laid criminal charges.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments? Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.