The DA said it would submit its objections to the proposed “rip-off” once Nersa opens public comments.
“South Africans are already struggling to stay above water due to rising costs of living and a high inflationary environment. For Eskom to add an additional high electricity tariff increase for a service it cannot provide is simply unacceptable,” said DA MP Kevin Mileham.
Mileham said consumers cannot be expected to subsidise Eskom’s unviable business model and the ANC’s decades-long failure to open up the energy market to independent power producers.
“Instead of liberalising the energy market and allowing IPPs to bring new energy generation capacity online, [energy minister] Gwede Mantashe is busy wasting time on a fantasy about a ‘new Eskom entity to compete with Eskom’.
“Nersa should reject Eskom’s exorbitant tariff application because its first obligation is towards consumers, not Eskom,” he said.
Mantashe is reportedly in talks with President Cyril Ramaphosa over the establishment of a “second Eskom’’.
The additional state-owned utility will work alongside Eskom and apparently focus entirely on generating electricity and building more power stations.
Mantashe told the Sunday Times the country needs “baseload”, an apparent reference to burning coal.
“What we are suggesting — it’s not a decision yet — is let’s have a second generation company of the state and that company must focus on baseload and there must be a build programme for power stations,” he said.
“We can’t allow power stations to only hear decommission. We must also have a build programme and we think if Eskom has no capacity, let’s start a second generation company.”
Support independent journalism by subscribing to the Sunday Times. Just R20 for the first month.