The DA is South Africa’s largest opposition party. In recent press releases, social media posts, and interviews, the party has regularly repeated the claim that “98% of all net new jobs in the last quarter of 2022 were created in the DA-run Western Cape”.
Of South Africa’s nine provinces, the Western Cape is the only one not governed by the ANC.
DA leader John Steenhuisen most recently repeated the claim in a May 25 interview for the BBC podcast Hard Talk with Stephen Sackur.
While there is some truth to the claim, the statistic being shared is misleading and, more importantly, out of date.
So what’s behind this figure, and what does it mean?
DA not comparing apples with apples
We contacted the DA to ask about their use of this statistic but had not received a response at the time of writing.
In a March 3 press release, however, the party explained that the 98% figure was calculated using data from Stats SA.
To record employment numbers, Stats SA uses the quarterly labour force survey (QLFS), a survey of households conducted four times a year. It collects information on the labour market participation of people aged 15 and older.
In its survey for the last quarter of 2022, covering October to December, Stats SA found the number of people employed in South Africa had increased by about 169,000 since the previous quarter. The number of people employed in the Western Cape increased by about 167,000.
While 167,000 is roughly 98.8% of 169,000, these figures hide a lot of nuances.
“It must be taken into consideration that, even though there were five provinces including the Western Cape that created employment, there were four provinces that lost employment in the same period,” Desiree Manamela, chief director of labour statistics at Stats SA, told Africa Check.
It is possible for employment to fall from quarter to quarter, as it did in four provinces in the last quarter of 2022, and it is possible for one province to contribute more than 100% of “net new jobs”. It is even possible for multiple provinces to contribute more than 100% of net new jobs in a quarter.
For example, if unemployment fell by 100,000 in each of seven provinces, but rose by 400,000 in each of two provinces, then national employment would have increased by 100,000 people (800,000 minus 700,000). In this scenario, the two provinces which saw employment increases would have contributed 400% of the 100,000 “net new jobs”.
If one of these two provinces were compared with the other eight, those eight provinces would have contributed a net loss of 300,000 jobs, despite that one saw huge growth.
Furthermore, “the QLFS does not use the term ‘net new jobs’ as we do not have an official definition on this”, Manamela told Africa Check. Instead, Stats SA calculates the percentage change in employment within a province.

By this measure, the Western Cape saw a 6.9% increase in the number of people employed in the province from July to September and October to December 2022. This was the highest increase, followed by the North West province with an increase of 2.6%, and the Northern Cape province with 3.6%.
But even this is not a good measure for comparison.
Manamela told Africa Check Stats SA does not recommend using quarter-to-quarter changes for comparison, as they are not adjusted for seasonal trends in employment.
“For example,” she said, “the December quarter is usually marked by an increase in jobs in the trade industry.” Seasonal changes like this can affect some provinces more than others.
Instead, Manamela recommended using year-on-year changes for comparison. By this measure, the Western Cape experienced the second-largest increase in employment (14.7%) of all provinces between the fourth quarter of 2021 and 2022, but no province had lost jobs. The largest increase (27%) was in the Northern Cape.

Neva Makgetla, a senior economist at the economic research organisation Trade and Industrial Policy Strategies, told Africa Check: “Stats SA publishes a database that averages the quarters for each year, called Labour Market Dynamics, that seeks to address these issues.”
These figures have not been published for 2021 and 2022, but Makgetla’s own calculations, based on data from the QLFS, showed the Western Cape experienced an average quarter-to-quarter growth in the number of people employed of 7%, while South Africa as a whole saw growth of 6%.
How pie charts can be deceiving
On February 28, the DA published a pie chart showing 169,000 jobs, of which 167,000 were in the Western Cape and 2,000 in the “ANC-run provinces”. This is a misleading way of presenting this information.
Pie charts, particularly three-dimensional pie charts, such as the one used by the DA, have long been considered an ineffective way of displaying information. While they have their uses, a pie chart is unhelpful in this situation.
Pie charts can’t display negative contributions, such as job losses. A much more helpful graph is a bar chart, like the one we’ve created below. This not only allows for comparisons between provinces, but can also show negative contributions to a total.

The DA’s pie chart masks that while the eight ANC-run provinces together had a net gain of about 2,000 jobs, provinces such as the North West and Eastern Cape had employment gains ten times higher.
More recent data is available
The misuse of statistics aside, the DA has not updated its claims to reflect the latest employment data.
On May 16, Stats SA released the QLFS for the period January to March 2023. These were the latest figures available, Makgetla told Africa Check. They showed the number of people employed in the country increased by 258,000. The figure for the Western Cape was 62,000.
Quarter to quarter, the Western Cape saw a 2.4% increase in employment. This puts it behind Limpopo, which had the largest percentage increase of 5.4%, and the Eastern Cape at 3%.
Year on year, the Western Cape has seen the country’s largest increase, of 15.7%, followed by the Eastern Cape (9.9%) and Limpopo (9.7%).
Despite these figures being available on May 16, Steenhuisen repeated the claim in a live broadcast on the DA’s YouTube channel on May 24. He did so again in his interview for Hard Talk, which was released on May 25, but appears to to have been recorded on May 24. (Note: Africa Check has contacted the BBC and the DA to ask when the podcast was recorded.)
In a press release in June, the DA was clear that the statistic applied only to the months October to December 2022, and not to the most recent financial quarter. But Steenhuisen also repeated the claim on Twitter in June, quoting his own address to parliament during a budget vote debate on May 31. The older stat may be more flattering to the DA, but by failing to update it, the party is cherry-picking data.
As Makgetla told us, employment figures “fluctuate considerably quarter on quarter”. By focusing only on the more impressive quarters, the DA is leaving out crucial context.
This isn’t the first time the DA has used outdated employment statistics. The party’s 2019 election manifesto included a claim that “50% of all new jobs in South Africa, in the past year, were created in the Western Cape”. We rated this claim as misleading because it did not reflect the most recent data available at the time of the manifesto’s publication.
Conclusion: DA’s frequent claim leaves out crucial context
The DA has regularly claimed it created 98% of all “net new jobs” in South Africa, without always clarifying which quarter of the year it was referring to.
While its calculation for the last quarter of 2022 is mathematically correct, it isn’t helpful in this context. Stats SA recommended using year-on-year changes in employment to compare provinces. These figures show the Western Cape had the second-largest increase in employment (14.7%) of any province between the fourth quarter of 2021 and 2022.
More recent data is also available. Between January to March 2022 and January to March 2023, the number of people employed in the Western Cape increased by 15.7%.
Due to the large fluctuations in employment figures from one quarter to the next, it is important to put numbers in context to accurately inform public debate.
• This report was written by Africa Check, a non-partisan fact-checking organisation. View the original piece on their website





Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.